DOJ Finds Biden is too Mentally Impaired to be Charged - Open

ThatOwlWoman said:
It clearly states in the SC's report that "However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Prosecution of Mr. Biden is also unwarranted based on our consideration of the aggravating and mitigating factors set forth in the Department of Justice's Principles of Federal Prosecution. For these reasons, we decline prosecution of Mr. Biden."

Hur just threw in that memory stuff in order to cast a #ComeySlur on Biden. Should Der Gropingfuehrer prevail in November, he hopes to rise high in the Fourth Reich.
Click to expand...

Hur's a MAGAt. He started his career with former justice Rehnquist, was an aide to Rod Rosenstein, nominated by trump to be a US Attorney. and contributes to repug candidates. And the gratuitous slurs at Biden prove he should never have been in charge of this investigation.
 
Earl said:
Indeed.

Biden escaped prosecution because he is a feeble half-wit.

It’s called the “feeble half-wit defense,”
Click to expand...


If this same report had been written about Trump and he were still President at the time the 25th amendment paperwork would have already been written.
 
volsrock said:
If this same report had been written about Trump and he were still President at the time the 25th amendment paperwork would have already been written.
Click to expand...

This man and report said Trump should be tried for stealing Americas most secret documents and should be found guilty in your same thinking you stupid russian ball licker
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
What a fool you are. There is a specific process that has to be followed in order to declassify materials. It doesn't happen by thinking about it, touching the materials, or waving a magic wand over them. :laugh: :rofl2: :laugh:

Be careful what you wish for, or you might get this.

QxEuXAy.jpg
Click to expand...

trump said he could declassify documents just by thinking about them, and repugs complain that Biden has issues.

Wonder how much Hur got paid for his trump campaign ad?
 
christiefan915 said:
Hur's a MAGAt. He started his career with former justice Rehnquist, was an aide to Rod Rosenstein, nominated by trump to be a US Attorney. and contributes to repug candidates. And the gratuitous slurs at Biden prove he should never have been in charge of this investigation.
Click to expand...

Biden can spin gold out of this hay by pointing out that his own attorney general chose this obviously biased MAGAT to lead the investigation, unlike #TRE45ON did with *his.* And the obviously-biased MAGAT found nothing actionable after all of this.
 
TOP said:
He interviewed the man for several hours and simply reported what he observed...
Click to expand...

And he’s not qualified to diagnose the sitting president with a critical memory loss


He’s a fucking lawyer NOT a medical professional


He just aided and abetted our foreign enemies
 
volsrock said:
In declining to prosecute Biden, Hur’s office also cited what it said was Biden’s “limited memory” both during his 2017 recorded conversations with the ghostwriter and in an interview with investigators last year.

“Given Mr. Biden’s limited precision and recall during his interviews with his ghostwriter and with our office, jurors may hesitate to place too much evidentiary weight on a single eight-word utterance to his ghostwriter about finding classified documents in Virginia, in the absence of other, more direct evidence.”

“We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” investigators wrote.







So DIPSHIT they decided not to bring charges because Biden is sad old man with mental issues


DAs can decide not to bring charges for many reasons....does not mean the person didn't commit a crime
Click to expand...

It's funny how you take someone else's words for what is in the report.
Bottom line is

Biden Exonerated!!!

The report says this
Nevertheless, we do not believe this evidence is sufficient, as jurors would likely find reasonable doubt for one or more of several reasons. Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep classified documents in his home.
Click to expand...

and this
Several defenses are likely to create reasonable doubt as to such charges. For example, Mr. Biden could have found the classified Afghanistan documents at his Virginia home in 2017 and then forgotten about them soon after. This could convince some reasonable jurors that he did not retain them willfully.
Click to expand...

and this
Another viable defense is that Mr. Biden might not have retained the classified Afghanistan documents in his Virginia home at all. They could have been stored, by mistake and without his knowledge, at his Delaware home since the time he was vice president, as were other classified documents recovered during our investigation. This would rebut charges that he willfully retained the documents in Virginia. would rebut charges that he willfully retained the documents in Virginia.
Click to expand...
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Biden can spin gold out of this hay by pointing out that his own attorney general chose this obviously biased MAGAT to lead the investigation, unlike #TRE45ON did with *his.* And the obviously-biased MAGAT found nothing actionable after all of this.
Click to expand...

And announce he had his memory examined by a professional and is diagnosed by a true professional to be perfectly capable
 
volsrock said:
WASHINGTON (AP) — A special counsel report released Thursday found evidence that President Joe Biden willfully retained and shared highly classified information when he was a private citizen, including about military and foreign policy in Afghanistan,
Click to expand...

but concluded that criminal charges were not warranted.

Why'd you skip that part?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top