lol, your hypocrisy is amazing, you want them to step in, but bash me for wanting obama to repudiate the agents comment on policy....which clearly ignored obama's stated policy
your intellectual dishonesty is sadly not surprising. you will go to any lengths, including dishonesty, just to disagree with and try to get me in some gotcha moment.
Are you really talking about dishonesty in another poster? That's really strange.
You're whole schtick on this thread has been dishonest; you got busted early on, and just kept digging yourself deeper. Your reaction from the get-go has been a knee-jerk, Obama-hater reaction - it hasn't been a reasoned reaction, with expectations that are based on the facts.
Both the cases that are being discussed here are still being investigated. The CO incident - the one for which you called Obama a liar, called for his resignation, said that he can't control his own DEA agents, said that he says one thing and "does" another, etc. - is very unclear as to if the agent was within his guidelines. You have said Obama should repudiate the agent immediately, without further factual evidence, but a cursory glance at the evidence suggests that the guy who they raided was violating at least 2 of the guidelines in the October memo, which you were dismissive of and implied were irrelevant, simply because you hate Obama so much.
I posted the memo a few posts back - you should read it, because you clearly haven't.
Since the Feds were raiding at a clip of about 30 a year on MM sites, I'm realistic enough to understand that there will be some unjustified raids for a time until the new policy becomes habit. If there is a pattern of unjustified raids, I DO expect something to be done about that. But I don't jump in immediately after an incident, which is still being investigated, and say Obama is a liar & should resign because he isn't immediately repudiating something.
