christiefan915
Catalyst
![]()
2020 was cheated by Democrats bigly. Just like we said all along.![]()

![]()
2020 was cheated by Democrats bigly. Just like we said all along.![]()
"Mentioning", aka baselessly claiming, means nothing in a meaningful conversation.My prediction: ZenMode will take a brief pause ... and then resume as if you had never mentioned any of the above, or as if it is all merely what you wish to believe.
That which can be asserted without relevance, can be dismissed without justification.“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
Nope. You suck at logic. You got it totally backwards. It's not that Trump's losing caused cheating to occur. That's stupid. It's the other way around: the DNC's cheating caused Tump to lose. Think about it for a little while and hopefully it will sink in.IOW, trump lost in 2020 so there had to be cheating.
You do realize that on Election Day 2024, I was following the election and commenting here on JPP about the cheating in Pennsylvania, right?You do realize that on Election Day 2024, trump said there was massive cheating in Philadelphia,
... not a lie. You have no idea what you're talking about. You're just a dishonest Kamala shill.and magas went with that lie
We aren't going to complain if we win despite Democrat cheating. You must be new at this.until trump pulled ahead in the state.
Nope. Trump declines the penalty.Is trump going to investigate the "Philadelphia cheating" now?
That which can be asserted without relevance, can be dismissed without justification.
Dismissed without justification.B
Deflecting isn't going to work.
Deflect all you'd like. You and Into the Night are equally unable to support your claims, hence they are dismissed.Dismissed without justification.
Pivot all you like. You are unable to accept overwhelming, incontrovertible evidence over what you desperately need to believe.Deflect all you'd like. You and Into the Night are equally unable to support your claims, hence they are dismissed.
"Incontrovertible evidence" = "someone thought they saw something".Pivot all you like. You are unable to accept overwhelming, incontrovertible evidence over what you desperately need to believe.
= flagrant denial on your part. Just go celebrate Trump's victory."Incontrovertible evidence" = "someone thought they saw something".
Trump stole this election. Jus' sayin'.IOW, trump lost in 2020 so there had to be cheating. You do realize that on Election Day 2024, trump said there was massive cheating in Philadelphia, and magas went with that lie until trump pulled ahead in the state. Is trump going to investigate the "Philadelphia cheating" now?
Mantra 30a. Lame. Argument of the Stone fallacy.Trained seal? You're making claim after claim and either a) don't have a source or b) don't want to share your source...for reasons that seem obvious.
Not my fault or my issue.
There was no election in 2020 due to election fraud by Democrats."Largest margin" of what? Certainly not electoral votes, that would be reagan in 1984. As for popular vote in was Biden in 2020, and we still don't know about 2024.
You're hallucinating again, Sybil.Trump stole this election. Jus' sayin'.![]()
There was no election in 2020. Trump didn't lose. Biden didn't win. You cannot win or lose an election that never took place.IOW, trump lost in 2020 so there had to be cheating.
There was, and it was by Democrats. It was not enough this time...not even in in Pennsylvania.You do realize that on Election Day 2024, trump said there was massive cheating in Philadelphia,
It was no lie.and magas went with that lie
Despite the election fraud by Democrats.until trump pulled ahead in the state.
Perhaps.Is trump going to investigate the "Philadelphia cheating" now?
Fallacy fallacy. There was no deflection or pivoting.B
Deflecting isn't going to work.
Denial? You literally can't provide anything but unsupported claims, combined with ghost stories about "they" and more stories from people who think they saw something. That's why you can't truly answer questions like "How many fraudulent ballots have been found and in which states." Your answer would DISprove your claim. So, you have to resort to conspiracy theories and ghost stories and more baseless claims like "They were all in one the steal".= flagrant denial on your part. Just go celebrate Trump's victory.
Ok. Then prove me wrong and post your source for the "10,000 fake ballots found and destroyed by National Guard."Mantra 30a. Lame. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
There was an election in 2020. I voted. My wife voted. Multiple people that I know voted. I set up and watched the results come in will passed midnight... Because there was an election, that had results that were being shown on TV. Stop being dumb. We all know there was an election in 2020 and you still can't create reality by repeating ridiculous things that aren't true.There was no election in 2020. Trump didn't lose. Biden didn't win. You cannot win or lose an election that never took place.
There was, and it was by Democrats. It was not enough this time...not even in in Pennsylvania.
It was no lie.
Despite the election fraud by Democrats.
Perhaps.