It's not realistic for someone who's active on a social media platform to state that they never read propaganda. Propaganda, broadly defined, is information—often biased or emotionally charged—designed to influence opinions or behaviors. On social media platforms, it’s nearly unavoidable.
Users are constantly exposed to posts, memes, ads, and arguments that fit this description, whether from individuals, influencers, or coordinated campaigns.
Even if someone claims they "never read propaganda," they’d have to define it narrowly—like state-sponsored disinformation—and actively filter their feed to avoid it, which is impractical given how algorithms work and how pervasive subtle persuasion is online.
If they’re active on the platform, they’re likely encountering it, knowingly or not.
Studies (e.g., from MIT or Stanford) show misinformation and propaganda spread faster than neutral content on social media due to engagement mechanics. X’s open nature amplifies this—anyone can post, and polarizing or manipulative content thrives.
Saying they "never" read it sounds more like denial or a misunderstanding of what propaganda entails than a feasible reality.
@Grok