It has??? Link or admit that you are just lying.
"BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP - IT'S "ALL OVER RED ROVER" SCOTUS WILL RULE IN FAVOUR OF TRUMP
- Thread starter Dachshund
- Start date
A history of birthright citizenship at the Supreme Court
This article was updated on Feb. 6 at 2:04 p.m. Shortly after being sworn into office on Jan. 20 for a second term, President Donald Trump issued an executive order […]
www.scotusblog.com
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
14th Amendment.
Into the Night
Verified User
Trump has not violated any part of the Constitution.
You are describing DEMOCRATS.
DEMOCRATS want to:
* Censor speech and declare state religions in violation of the 1st amendment and all State constitutions.
* Ban or limit guns in violation of the 2nd, 4th, 5th, 9th, 10th, and 14th amendments and Article I of the Constitution and all State constitutions.
* Subvert the election system in violation of Articles I, II, several amendments, and all State constitutions.
* Use courts to overrule the authority of Trump, in violation of Articles II and III.
* Call for civil war and commit acts of violence against US citizens in violation of state and federal laws and committing an act of treason.
* Invite invasion of the United States, an act of treason.
I could go on but the list gets too large.
You forgot the qualifier
What qualifier?
Into the Night
Verified User
He already did. The 14th amendment does not grant citizenship to illegal aliens or their offspring.A history of birthright citizenship at the Supreme Court
This article was updated on Feb. 6 at 2:04 p.m. Shortly after being sworn into office on Jan. 20 for a second term, President Donald Trump issued an executive order […]
You are simply wrong.
Into the Night
Verified User
Try again, Sybil. Nothing in the 14th amendment grants citizenship to illegal aliens or their offspring.
Into the Night
Verified User
Go read it, dumbass.
Given that you clearly disagree with SCOTUS it means YOU are wrong.
You seem to only be on here to stir up shit. Answer the question or remain silent. So far you've been wrong in this conversation.
Into the Night
Verified User
You don't get to change any part of the Constitution, Gunky.
Into the Night
Verified User
SCOTUS is not the Constitution, Gunky.
You clearly don't understand how the US Government operates. You are dismissed.
So your singular SCOTUS case that you are relying on is the Wong Kim Ark case correct?A history of birthright citizenship at the Supreme Court
This article was updated on Feb. 6 at 2:04 p.m. Shortly after being sworn into office on Jan. 20 for a second term, President Donald Trump issued an executive order […]
Into the Night
Verified User
Asking you to read the Constitution is 'stirring up shit'??? You think the Constitution is shit???
You aren't asking a question, Gunky.
Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Into the Night
Verified User
The US government isn't the Constitution, Gunky.
You vs SCOTUS = You being wrong. You are not a co-equal branch of the government so you are of no import in this conversation.
You are dismissed.