Into the Night
Verified User
Who is 'they', Hugo??What if they saw him die, so what?
'They' is not you, Hugo.
Who is 'they', Hugo??What if they saw him die, so what?
fuck youWho is 'they', Hugo??
'They' is not you, Hugo.
LIF. Get a life.True Scotsman fallacy.
No, it isn't. Nothing in the Constitution prevents it.
The Constitution is not involved here, Sybil.
Yes.
They certainly can, Sybil.
So you are saying or are denying that everything that the Bible tells us is nothing but conjecture?The only accounts of this is Bible scripture, the writings of prophets. It is not a proof. It is evidence only.
Random words. No apparent coherency.MAGA isn't a person, Sybil.
However, hearsay is not allowed in court as evidence, unless it is a dying utterance, let alone hearsay of hearsay...Evidence IS allowed in court. Witnesses don't have to be eyewitnesses either.
Hearsay IS allowed, so long as it is presented as hearsay.However, hearsay is not allowed in court as evidence, unless it is a dying utterance, let alone hearsay of hearsay...
The Bible is evidence, nothing more. It is not a proof. It is also not the only evidence of the existence of Jesus Christ or of God.So you are saying or are denying that everything that the Bible tells us is nothing but conjecture?
Again. You are misunderstanding, and largely incorrect. Hearsay is generally inadmissible in court, unless it falls under specific exemptions. I listed one of those, a dying utterance, say the person was dying and said, "Me and Jakey killed that girl" to a cop, that would be admissible. Other exemptions. If they said one thing during questioning or in another court case and now as a witness changed it (conversely it is also admissible to say he has been consistent in his story if the defense or prosecution says he is "now lying"), and finally reporting by the several witnesses present during a lineup.Hearsay IS allowed, so long as it is presented as hearsay.
Sure ,want an invite? Still change the subject, don't you. That is the lifestyle of Hegseth.Does your church have those?
What a complete loser ^Agreed. Otherwise she'd leave the luxuries and freedom of the West to go defend her people.
No...there's a Sunday night church service here in town that's close enough to what you mention...it's been here for years...Sure ,want an invite? Still change the subject, don't you. That is the lifestyle of Hegseth.
Yeah, we do paint you dems as having a disdain for Christianity. And so you know, that paint is still wet with and getting more slippery
with every anti Christian move you dems make.
A real teacher would know it's both illegal and unconstitutional for public school employees to lead a public schools class in prayer. As noted in the link, this is in compliance with the Constitution.
![]()
Prayer and Religious Expression at Public Schools: FAQ
Find answers to key questions students, educators, and parents have about religious expression and accommodations in PK-12 schools.www.ed.gov
May public schools require students to participate in prayer or religious expression?
No. As government officials, public school employees must remain neutral towards religion and nonbelief while acting in their official capacities. For example, employees acting in their official capacities may not lead students in prayer (even if asked to do so by students), encourage or discourage student participation in religious expression, or promote or discourage participation in religious activities.
Do you also believe that it was just hearsay that people actually saw Christ die on the cross?
^ Claims to be a follower of Christ, yet feels obligated to judge others. It's YOU we disdain, not Christians in general. Worry about your own soul rather than others' souls.
So, the world has not come to an end because there was a Christian service at the Pentagon... Relax and Carry on, everyone...