Your lips say no, but your eyes say yes, Ms. Edwina. Elon owns your Orange Jesus, sweetcheeks.
![]()
lol it was you commies who loved Elon and his electric car subsidies, not me, tranni boi.
Your lips say no, but your eyes say yes, Ms. Edwina. Elon owns your Orange Jesus, sweetcheeks.
![]()
Nope. Climate is a measure of objective characteristics over a long period of time. Go learn English.Nope. Climate is a subjective description. It has no temperature.
Correct.Climate is not science.
Opinion stated as fact.Climate cannot change.
There is.There is no science of 'climate change'.
Opinion stated as fact.Climate cannot change.
He is and so are you. If you understood climate change, you would know there is no additional energy being created.He is not 'misusing' the 1st law of thermodynamics:
E{t+1} = E - U where 'E' is energy, and 'U' is work (or force over time).
Ok.Temperature is the average thermal energy.
Correct.To raise the temperature, that means more thermal energy.
Correct. I'm glad we agree.You can't create energy out of nothing.
I guess you figure that you can make hot coffee by using a CO2 fire extinguisher.
Oh, Ms. Edwina. Your coy flirting will get you nowhere with me. I can send you a dick pic if you like, but that's as far as I'll go. Engorged or flaccid.lol it was you commies who loved Elon and his electric car subsidies, not me, tranni boi.
Lol, I've noticed a pattern with paranoid conspiracy nuts, libtards, and toddlers. Their brains are so fried they can't come up with their own comebacks. I wonder how long you thought about how to reply, desperately trying for you very own original thought. Of course, you couldn't pull it off, so you copied me, ROFL. Sit Edwina sit, no biscuit for you until you stop being a dumbass drone.Just keep advocating swindling, trusts, and thievery as a replacement for free enterprise. You clearly need that cocoon for survival. Otherwise you would starve like the rest of the fake 'libertoons'. Noe get back on the porch, puppy, it's time for your nap.
you have clearly chosen evil.Random words. No apparent coherency.
This is exceedingly poor grammar. You should have written "You wouldn't recognize a leftist if he were wearing a hat with red stars. "You wouldn't know a leftist if they wore hats with red stars.
Quit pretending that you add value to conversations at the adults' table.Quit pretending you know stuff.
Label it as you please. It's still all true.
Climate has no temperature, Void.Again, temperature is a characteristic of climate. Again, you know that but insist on playing dumb.
You ARE playing word games. Go learn English.Opinion stated as fact.
Nope. You struggle with English...and not playing dumb word games.
I have already presented the 1st law of thermodynamics to you, and STILL you choose to ignore it, leftist.You wouldn't know a leftist if they wore hats with red stars. Quit pretending you know stuff.
You are not God.you have clearly chosen evil.
that sucks for you.
Math error: Void unit.Nope. Climate is a measure of objective characteristics over a long period of time.
LIF. Grow up.Go learn English.
Go learn what 'fact' means.Correct.
Opinion stated as fact.
There is no science of 'climate change'. Climate cannot change.There is.
Go learn what 'fact' means.Opinion stated as fact.
Climate has no temperature. Climate cannot change. You are openly discarding the 1st law of thermodynamics.He is and so are you. If you understood climate change, you would know there is no additional energy being created.
You don't agree. You are now locked in paradox. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox. It's irrational.Ok.
Correct.
Correct. I'm glad we agree.
both sides of a paradox having good arguments is actually what makes it a paradox, fucking idiot.Math error: Void unit.
Climate is a subjective description.
LIF. Grow up.
Go learn what 'fact' means.
There is no science of 'climate change'. Climate cannot change.
Go learn what 'fact' means.
Climate has no temperature. Climate cannot change. You are openly discarding the 1st law of thermodynamics.
You don't agree. You are now locked in paradox. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox. It's irrational.
Arguing both sides of a paradox is irrational, NoName. You just wind up contradicting yourself.both sides of a paradox having good arguments is actually what makes it a paradox, fucking idiot.
wrong.Arguing both sides of a paradox is irrational, NoName. You just wind up contradicting yourself.
You cannot clear your paradox by calling it a single argument, NoName.
Contradicting yourself is not rational, NoName.wrong.
they're both rational.
that's why its a paradox, dumbass.
Everyone is stupid but you???why are you all so fucking stupid.
basically.Everyone is stupid but you???![]()
you don't understand what paradox means then.Contradicting yourself is not rational, NoName.
Arguing both sides of a paradox is irrational.
Random words. No apparent coherency. Capitalism is not socialism. Go learn English.basically.
its also a highly moral set of affairs.
you feel your bread is buttered by fascism so you lie.