Incorrect. One does not study an unfalsifiable religious doctrine. The correct verb is "worship."
The atmosphere is not an unfalsifiable religious doctrine. Any scientific discipline can be rejected to worship Climate Change.
... but Climate Change has only been worshiped since the 1980s.
No measuring is involved in any climate. Your repetition of this error shows conclusively that you are too stupid to learn.
OK, so you cannot unambiguously defined the global climate that you insist is real. Got it.
That's your label, based on a list of incorrect assumptions and conspiracy theories. Your irrational beliefs don't change the fact that there are plenty of scientific areas of study that interact with climate science.
Correct. Atmosphere has no religion.
Sure. You can do whatever you want in your own mind.
Which changes nothing about the fact that the science behind climate change, and more specifically global warming due to so-called green house gases, has been studied since the 18th century...long before you and your crazy conspiracy theories came into existence.
I'll try again.... there are characteristics associated with different climate types. Those characteristics are things like temperature, humidity, rainfall, etc. Those items are objectively measured.
You continued avoidance and word games are noted.
Yes, that's my approach.
Does Jesus hate me?
he hates it when people devalue themselves.
Nope. It's based on your descriptions. You have clearly explained the fantastic miracles involved in the WACKY physics-violating dogma that you worship irrationally. Just like all religions, the terms for yours cannot be unambiguously defined. Your religious doctrine cannot be falsifiably stated such that they do not immediately reveal themselves to be false.
This is your standard pivot. I'm not the one making any sort of affirmative claim. Observations of the religious nature of your WACKY dogma are not somehow irrational beliefs. If you weren't so scientifically illiterate, you would understand this.
Just like all scientific areas of study interact with Chistianity. Noah employed biology to calculate how to load his ark. I can use chemistry to fully appreciate the miracle at Cana. I can even use physics to calculate the momentum of the first stone cast by he who has no sin.
There is no science behind your religious doctrine of a global climate that you cannot unambiguously define. There is no science behind any religion.
FTFY. Incorrect. The Global Warming faith has only been worshiped since the 1980s. Things being studied in the 1800s is not the same as Global Warming being worshiped contemporarily.
Recurring pivot. I am not the one whose stupid affirmative argument is being discussed. Your religious faith is your affirmative argument and it is stupid, requiring heavy scientific illiteracy and solid mathematical incompetency to believe.
Does Jesus hate when people devalue themselves in your eyes, or does Jesus simply hate me.
Are you going to stupidly insist yet again that there measurements and data somehow accompany inherently subjective and ambiguous climate characterizations?
You are a master of saying nothing. Please specify some category for which there are somehow not characteristics associated with its different types.
Notice that measurements thereof are not such characteristics, only the subjective human characterizations thereof.
Only for the weather; never for any climate.
Dishonesty? Scientific illiteracy? Word games? Assigning bogus positions so you have something to attack? Sudden jerky pivots? "Yes" to all the above?
of course, Jesus makes his own decisions on when people are devaluing themselves.
... but Jesus' criteria happen to exactly align with yours, yes?
no.
... because you have Jesus' insights, yes? Were you both educated at the same school?
... because I ask you what you mean, right?
Climate science exists. I know this because Trump, by his own admission, just fired them.
See above post and get back to me when you're ready for an intelligent discussion.
we have the same dad.
Jesus is dead. He doesn't do anything.
Only in your mind. There is no science of any religion. There is no falsifiable model of the inherently unfalsifiable.
He fired religious zealots who were political activists, who were pretending to be scientists.
I don't understand what Salvation is either.
I can describe any climate I wish, and you can't stop me.
... says the scientifically illiterate and mathematically incompetent Bozo who doesn't know what science is, who doesn't know the difference between climate and weather, who believes that subjective human characterizations are measurement data, who believes that science only applies sometimes, and who cannot recognize a religion when he is in the process of worshiping its WACKY dogma.
... says the guy who doesn't understand thermodynamics any better than he understands brain surgery.
So we can expect peace and quiet from you while I allow you to stew in your ignorance? Thank you.
