It's time for the forums leftist Democrats to step up and tell us what their party stands for

[Libhater]

Only read the first page of this thread, but, has any leftist even tried to disavow any or all of the Truth Detector's brilliant
highlighting of the many disastrous actions/beliefs of the democrat party's sad state of affairs? Face it libs, your party
is destined for the trash bin of failed ideas and policies. Your party is not only immoral, but it is anti American, pro death,
pro criminal illegals, pro globalism, anti Christian, anti white, pro open borders, pro Hamas and anti common sense.

 

[ZenMode]

Random words. No apparent coherency.

That should be your signature. It perfectly sums up the majority of your posts.

 

[ZenMode]

I'd like to hear what your party stands for. Here's what I see it standing for:

Abortion on demand any time.

Also @Libhater @Into the Night

LibHater asked if any Democrats have disavowed this claim. Since nobody can speak for all Democrats, All Republicans, all libertarians, etc and there is a 100% chance that there are varying opinions among democrats anyway, let's look at the facts.

The claim is that all Democrats want abortion on demand permitted at any time, which means literally up until birth.

Roe versus Wade set the limits of abortion on demand at viability. Generally around 21 weeks, with many having exceptions for situations where the mother's life is in danger.

Since Roe versus Wade was overturned, which would remove the viability limitation, can someone tell me all of the states that have passed laws allowing abortion on demand at, as you say, any time?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Godwin's Law.
This isn't Germany, and the year is 2025.
Capitalism isn't fascism, Gunky.

Random words. No apparent coherency.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

You can't blame your mental institution on me or anybody else, Sybil.

Random words. No apparent coherency.
LIF. Grow up.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

You can't blame your mental treatment facility on me or anybody else, Sybil.

You can't blame your mental institution on anybody else, Sybil.

You can't blame your mental institution on me or anybody else, Sybil.

^^^
Speaking of mental institutions. LOL

 

[Into the Night]

Nope. You can't speak for "Democrats" on anything and your claim that they ALL want abortion on demand at any time is BS.

I am not speaking for Democrats. They have made this one of their agenda items. It is stated by Democrats AND you.

How many Dem states, since RvW was overturned, have passed new laws allowing abortion on demand past viability? Name one. You can't and the fact that YOU can't is not me playing word games.

RQAA

RQAA = not answering, yes.

NaN. Redefinition fallacy. I already answered your question. Stop mindlessly repeating it.

(copy/paste) If it's a blatant lie, then tell me how many Dem states, since RvW was overturned, have passed new laws allowing abortion on demand past viability?

RQAA

That's your opinion.

Killing another human being for the sake of convenience is NOT my opinion, Void.

Yes, violence is a physical action. SAYING something isn't voilence, snowflake. Do you need a safe space?

Breaking and entering isn't "saying something". Thuggery isn't "saying something". It is criminal behavior.

Words aren't thuggery, snowflake.

Denying the thuggery won't work, Void.

Nope, all weren't and stop with the lazy generalizations.

All were. Not a generalization.

Because the president, like you, doesn't know the difference between words and violence either.

Thuggery isn't legal, Void.

Retarded word games. Ignored.

Blatant lie. You keep playing them.

The same rules were in place under Biden that were in place under every other president. The only thing that changed was the number of people coming to the border. For fucks sake, educate yourself.

Biden ignored most of Title 8, and committed treason as well. Inviting invasion of the United States is an act of treason.

The US has "invited" people for centuries, you dolt.

Never happened. You cannot equate legal immigration with illegal immigration.

We have an asylum process

Illegal aliens are not eligible for applying for asylum, Void. They broke the law.

because we are literally inviting people here to seek asylum. Do you find it hard to breathe with your head so far up your ass?

False equivalence fallacy.

Ignorant.

Inversion fallacy.

The border crisis was a combination of two things:

One thing. Biden/Kamala/Mayorkas/Obama inviting and invasion of the United States; an act of treason.

Title 42 being lifted and the perception that Dems are more welcoming to immigrants.

Illegal aliens are breaking the law. Biden committed an act of treason.

Again, we have a LEGAL PROCESS for asylum in place for a reason.

Illegal aliens are not eligible for asylum. They broke the law.

Biden did nothing different.

Blatant lie.

Asylum seekers came to the border, were screened and turned away or allowed in.

Illegal aliens are not eligible for asylum. They broke the law.

Again, this is precisely how it's worked for decades under every president.

Blatant lie.

JFC...It was to make the process more efficient.

Blatant lie.

Post after post of easily falsified claims, irrational, ignorant generalizations, lies and idiocy and you're to deep in the far-right insanity to even realize how dumb you sound.

Then stop making them.

 

[Into the Night]

^^^
Speaking of mental institutions. LOL

You can't blame your mental institution on me or anybody else, Sybil.

 

[Into the Night]

That should be your signature. It perfectly sums up the majority of your posts.

You can't blame Sybil's problems on me or anybody else, Void.

 

[Into the Night]

Also @Libhater @Into the Night

LibHater asked if any Democrats have disavowed this claim. Since nobody can speak for all Democrats, All Republicans, all libertarians, etc and there is a 100% chance that there are varying opinions among democrats anyway, let's look at the facts.

It is the stated position of the Democrats to support the murder of human beings for the sake of convenience.

The claim is that all Democrats want abortion on demand permitted at any time, which means literally up until birth.

It is the stated position of the Democrats to support the murder of human beings for the sake of convenience.

Roe versus Wade set the limits of abortion on demand at viability.

Murder is murder, Void.

Generally around 21 weeks, with many having exceptions for situations where the mother's life is in danger.

Murcer id murder, Void.

Since Roe versus Wade was overturned, which would remove the viability limitation, can someone tell me all of the states that have passed laws allowing abortion on demand at, as you say, any time?

RQAA. Strawman fallacy.

 

[ZenMode]

^^^
Speaking of mental institutions. LOL

It's really no wonder that Into the Night can't have legitimate, honest discussions. a) He's a far-right conspiracy theorist and he's religious. Those two things go hand-in-hand these days. But, he also b) fancies himself a semi-intellectual and an objective believer in science.

A and B simply can't go together and it's easy to see the result. The result is an unwillingness to engage in actual conversation or debate. When pushed, he resorts to avoidance via these weird "fallacy" statements, provides no sources for his scientific beliefs beyond saying "It's true because I say it's true and science says it's true" and claims to have answered questions that he clearly hasn't answered.

The level of mental "gymnastics" he has to perform would put Simone Biles to shame.

 

[ZenMode]

It is the stated position of the Democrats to support the murder of human beings for the sake of convenience.

It is the stated position of the Democrats to support the murder of human beings for the sake of convenience.

Murder is murder, Void.

Murcer id murder, Void.

RQAA. Strawman fallacy.

So, @Into the Night couldn't provide any support for the claim that "Democrats" want to allow abortion on demand at ANY time.

Anyone else care to try? @Libhater? @Truth Detector?

 

[Into the Night]

It's really no wonder that Into the Night can't have legitimate, honest discussions.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Bulverism fallacy.

a) He's a far-right conspiracy theorist and he's religious.

The Democrat party is a conspiracy. It is not theory.

Those two things go hand-in-hand these days.

You think the Democrat party is a religion??? Hmmmmm. I think I agree with you.

But, he also b) fancies himself a semi-intellectual and an objective believer in science.

Science is not a religion. You just want to ignore it. You have already discarded the laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

A and B simply can't go together and it's easy to see the result.

Random words ignored.

The result is an unwillingness to engage in actual conversation or debate.

Inversion fallacy. You can't blame your problems on anybody else, Void.

When pushed, he resorts to avoidance via these weird "fallacy" statements,

You cannot blame your fallacies on me or anybody else.

provides no sources for his scientific beliefs

Blatant lie. I have already provided you with a copy of the laws of science you ignore. Science needs no other source.

beyond saying "It's true because I say it's true and science says it's true"

The theories of science that you ignore are still theories of science, Void.

and claims to have answered questions that he clearly hasn't answered.

I have. You just keep asking the same question over and over mindlessly.

The level of mental "gymnastics" he has to perform would put Simone Biles to shame.

Inversion fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

So, @Into the Night couldn't provide any support for the claim that "Democrats" want to allow abortion on demand at ANY time.

I already answered you. RQAA

Anyone else care to try? @Libhater? @Truth Detector?

They already answered you. RQAA.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

It's really no wonder that Into the Night can't have legitimate, honest discussions. a) He's a far-right conspiracy theorist and he's religious. Those two things go hand-in-hand these days. But, he also b) fancies himself a semi-intellectual and an objective believer in science.

A and B simply can't go together and it's easy to see the result. The result is an unwillingness to engage in actual conversation or debate. When pushed, he resorts to avoidance via these weird "fallacy" statements, provides no sources for his scientific beliefs beyond saying "It's true because I say it's true and science says it's true" and claims to have answered questions that he clearly hasn't answered.

The level of mental "gymnastics" he has to perform would put Simone Biles to shame.

Agreed on far-right conspiracy theorist, but his only religion is Trump. He's severely mentally ill.

Agreed there's an unholy alliance between the Alt-Right and religious extremists. Specifically, the Evangelistas. This is shown in the voting polls cross-indexed with religious preferences as shown below.

FWIW, lumping all Christians into the same pot is a mistake since it alienates the majority of them who disagree with the bigots, homophobes, misogynists, racists, pedophiles and other assorted assholes who make up the Party of Trump.

Additionally, just because someone voted for Trump in the previous three elections doesn't make them a Trumper. About half of them are independents. An example is myself. I've always voted Republican with Romney being my last Republican vote before I couldn't hold my nose long enough to vote for a party that was overtly racist, misogynistic and, in general, anti-American by seeking to strip Americans of their rights and divide the nation against itself. I vote Libertarian as a protest vote. If the two main parties ran better candidates, I'd vote for them.

5. Party identification among religious groups and religiously unaffiliated voters

Partisanship remains strongly linked to registered voters’ religious affiliation, and religious “nones” have become more Democratic.

www.pewresearch.org

 

[ZenMode]

I already answered you. RQAA

They already answered you. RQAA.

Answering isn't providing support. Surely you don't think anyone is going to believe you or LibHater or Truth Detector simply because you say something, right?

Agreed on far-right conspiracy theorist, but his only religion is Trump. He's severely mentally ill.

Agreed there's an unholy alliance between the Alt-Right and religious extremists. Specifically, the Evangelistas. This is shown in the voting polls cross-indexed with religious preferences as shown below.

FWIW, lumping all Christians into the same pot is a mistake since it alienates the majority of them who disagree with the bigots, homophobes, misogynists, racists, pedophiles and other assorted assholes who make up the Party of Trump.

Additionally, just because someone voted for Trump in the previous three elections doesn't make them a Trumper. About half of them are independents. An example is myself. I've always voted Republican with Romney being my last Republican vote before I couldn't hold my nose long enough to vote for a party that was overtly racist, misogynistic and, in general, anti-American by seeking to strip Americans of their rights and divide the nation against itself. I vote Libertarian as a protest vote. If the two main parties ran better candidates, I'd vote for them.

5. Party identification among religious groups and religiously unaffiliated voters

Partisanship remains strongly linked to registered voters’ religious affiliation, and religious “nones” have become more Democratic.

www.pewresearch.org

Yes, I should have said "evangelicals" or something different.

Yes, voting for Trump doesn't make you a Trumper. There are only two legitimate contenders for President and lots of people will find themselves voting for, in their mind, garbage.

 

[Into the Night]

Give it a shot? I might as well try to get @moon and @IBDaMann to not support terrorists.

So...you can't answer what Democrat stand for either.You decide to evade the question and pivot.

 

[Into the Night]

Glad to have aroused your impotence ^

Haw, haw.......................................haw.

At least you admit you support terrorists.

 

[Into the Night]

What? I asked a legitimate question.

An evasion is not a legitimate question. Answer the question put to you.

 

[moon]

At least you admit you support terrorists.

Weirdo. ^ Poses for himself.