... but they are not. Your assertion is, of course, absurd. Al Qassam answers to the Ayatollah of Iran, and to him alone. Al Qassam does not answer to Gaza's administrators. What are you, new?Right. Hamas is not al Qassam . As I've said repeatedly, al cqassam is the military arm of Hamas.
Psychosis ^Lie ^
Delusion ^The General Assembly has the mechanism to overrride the Security Council.
Still waiting for your source for this claim. I've requested numerous times.... but they are not. Your assertion is, of course, absurd. Al Qassam answers to the Ayatollah of Iran, and to him alone. Al Qassam does not answer to Gaza's administrators. What are you, new?
It's not my ass that needs saving. You tried to slip a "The General Assembly overrules the Security Council" in there hoping no one would catch it. Well, I caught it and now you are desperate to save face. You got caught and now you are gibbering incoherently while drooling on your shoe.All this waffle won't save your ass.
Nope, not in this quadrant.Again, the UN General Assembly has a mechanism to overrule the Security Council.
I fully deny it. Proceed with showing me to be a lying asshold.I'll post it when you're fully committed to being a lying asshole by denying it .
My reputation is solid. I'm the most ignored member of JPP ... next to Dutch-Dutch.No point in just crushing your already-dubious reputation
So your plan is to wait long enough for everyone to hopefully forget about your gaffe.Let's get to, say...a thousand views ..and then finish you off.
The really funny thing is that you are broadcasting how you know that you're egregiously mistaken.The really satisfying thing is that I know that YOU know that I'm right.
Cum-bubble.. We can do this all day.Asshole..
That which is no secret, and that which is common knowledge, is that the additional forum of discussion cannot overrule the legally binding Security Council resolutions. This leads to the question of how you do not know this, or whether you actually know anything in the first place.The mechanism is no secret. It's common knowledge.
Sure. I deny it some more. I fully acknowledge that you are incorrect. I recognize that you don't know the first thing about the UN. I recognize that you cannot distinguish between a militant terrorist organization serving Iran and Gaza's civilian administrators.Come on back and deny it some more.
Pivot. There is no such thing as a source for something that is true. Were you going to provide evidence that the Ayatollah loaned out his proxy, Al Qassam, to Gaza's administrators to "take 'em for a spin"? Iran funds Al Qassam at $100 million / year and Hamas never had any money. Are you saying that Iran decided to "lend" Hamas a militant terrorist group out of charity?Still waiting for your source for this claim.
You have never provided any evidence for your absurd claims. Show me the documentation of the Ayatollah's agreement with Hamas requiring the return of Al Qassam in good working order by a specified date.I've requested numerous times.
I'm not the one who needs anyone to believe absolute comedy fiction.Surely, you don't expect any to believe you solely based on you saying it, right?
Nope, totally true, of course.Untrue, of course.
I believe you’ve been steeped in bigotry for so long you can’t fathom a worldview without it. You’ll never believe I along with so many others, never once hated any race, religion, skin tone, or peaceful culture. Many fortunate people were raised with a very simple yet powerful rule, only judge a person by their deeds, my parents didn’t poison me with prejudice, so I grew up seeing people with different melanin levels, cultures, religions, and beliefs as interesting but irrelevant when judging a person's credibility, intelligence, sanity, and character.There are more than two sides. Eyewitnesses are the only side in which I am interested.
Israel, specifically the Likud Party.
Quite the understatement. When the IDF mows down innocent men, women and children just because they are Arab, and then says "Oh, we aren't responsible!" ... there isn't much credibility there.
Let's say, hypothetically, that someone were to claim that Gaza's administrators were of this opinion, is there any evidence to back this up? Obviously the evidence for the IDF's genocidal position is overwhelming, i.e. the active genocide itself.
Too funny! Let's try it this way: The Nazis, whatever their flaws were,
They don't advocate it. They do it. By the looks of it, they're just getting started. Israel has broken every cease-fire. Israel sabotages all peace talks. Israel will not stop slaughtering Arabs by the thousands ... Arabs who never attacked Israel and who never had anyone "hiding behind" them.
I don't recognize those who self-identify as Palestinian as being Palestinian because there is no Palestine. I don't recognize vampires and trans-women either.
Do your insticts flare when Zionist terrorists blow up apartment buildings, shopping centers, schools and hospitals just because they are full of Arabs? Do you totally fall for it when the terrorists thereafter pretend that they somehow took out a "Hamas military base" or something equally absurd.
Thanks for reminding me. Murders of gays in Israel has been increasing for years.
Thanks for reminding me. Israelis oppress Arabs like they are slaves. Any IDF commander can raze any Arab's home for morale and amusement purposes, and arrest him without any sort of warrant or court order. After said Arab has sat in jail for a few weeks and is released because there never was any evidence of any crime, they don't rebuild his home. Israel rules through fear and brutal punishment.
Oh, were you going to bring Iran's proxies into this as well? I totally agree that the IDF, Hezbollah, Al Qassam, and Islamic Jihad are the planet's most active and horrific terrorist organizations in that order. I wouldn't believe any propaganda coming from any of them.
Don't forget "violate conventions by committing hundreds of egregious war crimes daily," "perpetrate genocide for a spike in popularity polls in Israel," "slaughter aid workers who try to help the targets of the terrorism," etc...
... but you are supposed to be commenting on the specific eyewitnesses. What reasons do you have for dismissing their testimony?
We are talking about the credibility of eyewitnesses. Are they credible or not? Are American eyewitnesses credible but Arab eyewitnesses not?
Hamas have never killed or mutilated children. Are you conflating Hamas with Al Qassam, i.e. the militant terrorist organization that attacked Israel? Surely you aren't accusing Gaza's civilian administrators of killing and mutilating children, are you?
Speaking of pictures, would you do me a quick favor and post a few images of Hamas fighters who are not Al Qassam fighters?
Are you not aware that that is an absurd quip that the gullible are told to regurgitate? Have you not thought through how absurd the concept is? There can be no such thing as "human shields" when the IDF are out to kill all Arabs. Any Arab who is trying to survive being waxed by IDF terrorists doesn't stand any better chance of surviving by throwing another Arab in front of himself and hiding behind him. He has only guaranteed that both will be slaughtered. The idea of "human shield" requires the attacking force to respect the "shield" and not attack for fear of harming the shield. The IDF are looking to lay waste to all shields as well as all other Arabs. There can be no such thing as any human shields where the IDF are concerned.
FTFY. I don't disagree. Also, if peaceful, defenseless Arabs from a place like Gaza simply wish to live their lives, Israel would nonetheless flatten that place into a smoking husk, where dead children by the tens of thousands need to fished out of rubble, and American Christians and Jews will all be high-fiving each other in celebration.
So, admit it, be a man and be honest, you're hate for Arabs had consumed you long before Israel began their genocide in Gaza.
Nope. Admitting that you are on the very wrong side of this issue would be too painful for you, hence I don't foresee it ever happening.
Observations are not propaganda. Your denial of observations is the worst kind of dishonesty.
You haven't answered the question. Are eyewitnesses credible? What about Arab eyewitnesses?
Did this actually make sense in your mind when you wrote it?Pivot. There is no such thing as a source for something that is true.
Right, many countries coordinate with and fund projects around the world. Russia and Syria were buddy, buddy for awhile. North Korea, I believe, is providing military troops to Russia, so, yes, I'm certain that Iran funds terrorist activities in Muslim majority countries.Were you going to provide evidence that the Ayatollah loaned out his proxy, Al Qassam, to Gaza's administrators to "take 'em for a spin"? Iran funds Al Qassam at $100 million / year and Hamas never had any money. Are you saying that Iran decided to "lend" Hamas a militant terrorist group out of charity?
You have never provided any evidence for your absurd claims. Show me the documentation of the Ayatollah's agreement with Hamas requiring the return of Al Qassam in good working order by a specified date.
I'm not the one who needs anyone to believe absolute comedy fiction.
In what bigotry do you mistakenly believe that I am steeped? Oh wait, you're confusing my observations with my opinions again. I see. Well, I'll let you finish what you were saying.I believe you’ve been steeped in bigotry for so long you can’t fathom a worldview without it.
I won't believe it as long as you cheer on the genocide of Arabs because the "chosen people" of your religion tell you to believe such.You’ll never believe I along with so many others, never once hated any race, religion, skin tone, or peaceful culture.
Yet you negatively judge Arabs and summarily dismiss their eyewitness testimony ... because they are Arabs. At the same time, you absolutely OBEY the Israelites in whatever they tell you to think. I don't see any judging by actions; I see only your judging per Israeli fiat.Many fortunate people were raised with a very simple yet powerful rule, only judge a person by their deeds,
Your religion did.my parents didn’t poison me with prejudice,
... except you grew up fully understanding the Philistines are the "bad guys" in the world, and your job is to be a champion for the Israelites, i.e. for God's chosen people. You think it's perfectly OK to engage in special pleading fallacies that excuse Israel of any and all war crimes that are universally illegal for everyone else on the planet. Your enthusiastic support for a Nazi-style genocide is unconscionable ... quite a tribute to the religion that gave it to you.so I grew up seeing people with different melanin levels, cultures, religions, and beliefs as interesting but irrelevant
Bigotry is business-as-usual when one allows other people to do their thinking for him.Bigotry is so obviously absurd when you’re not fed it from the cradle.
Let's talk about Arabs being slaughtered. Why is it OK with you? Why do you blame people OTHER THAN the Israelis who are doing the killing?I’ve never carried hatred for any group, not for a single day.
... or at least you think you can, but you can't spot your own.I can spot entrenched bias a mile away,
Sure. Let's make sure to include the eyewitnesses to the stolen 2020 election.... you've chosen 'eyewitnesses' so let's talk about them.
... which is usually just observations, because I base all my "points of view" on observations.I often agree with your point of view,
This is where you get to explain how my observations equate to antisemitism on my part.but your take on Gaza reeks of anti-Semitism,
This is where you get to explain how observations equate to abandoned logic in favor of the talking points of dead people.and it’s painful to watch you ditch logic for Hamas talking points
So explain to me why you don't believe that the 2020 election was stolen.and of course the “eyewitnesses” like they’re ironclad,
Tell me this isn't bigotry right here.on par with what an American thinks of as an eyewitness.
Common sense says that your bigotry is not common sense.Common sense says good luck finding a man on the street in Gaza that's openly anti-Hamas
Why do you believe that there is only one current narrative?and would say anything that contradicted the current narrative,
... because they are all Arab, right? You made it a point that Israelis in Gaza are trustworthy. Why is that?There is no such thing as a reliable eyewitness in Gaza.
That the IDF is the world's most active terrorist organization on the planet, having killed tens of thousands of innocent Arabs who never attacked Israel, simply out of RACIST hatred, and of genocidal mania by the Likud Party, ... is an observation, not propaganda.Then we have to deal with the nutcases like .........fill in the blank with your choice of long-time antisemitic journalists, publications, talking heads, and professors that all believe the ends justifies the means and have no problem stretching or completely fabricating 'facts' that support the Israel is purposefully killing children narrative and other terrorist propaganda.
Newsflash: there is more than one video in the world.The world has the video
Post those videos as well. I'll see if I can dig up some of the many RACIST Israeli videos taunting Arabs (who never attacked Israel) with an imminent 2nd Nakba (ethnic cleansing) and other horrendous videos.and the words from the anti-Zionist radical Isalmist scumbags like Hamas
You can't accurately recount any argument of mine on this topic. All you can do is deny inconvenient observations as somehow being my mere opinions.I’ve seen plenty of your arguments,
I don't obsess over any supposed evils. Your contradiction, however, of both denying the genocide of Arabs while simultaneously cheering it on, is what needs to be explained. Actually you have so many things that need to be explained but you only pivot.Your obsession with Israel’s supposed evils
This is where you get to point out where I have spoken about "Jews" in general.It comes from a deep-seated hatred of Jews overriding your usual clarity.
You obviously don't understand how this whole internet thing works. You are the one who has to support your positions; I am not obligated to prove your affirmative assertions false. I can rebut your absurdities if I wish, but I am not required, especially if you can't/won't support them in the first place.Prove me wrong.
I hate seven specific people.Tell me you don’t hate anyone,
Nope. We have already started with your double standard that you have not adequately explained. Why should Arab eyewitnesses be summarily dismissed yet Zionist terrorists are not to be questioned.How about we start with what you think is the best example of a credible eyewitness.
Are you too stupid for it to make sense?Did this actually make sense in your mind when you wrote it?
Post the published agreement between Iran and Gaza's administrators.Right, many countries coordinate with and fund projects around the world.
Iran and Gaza's administrators never had any agreement or treaty ... unless you are going to show that one existed.Russia and Syria were buddy, buddy for awhile.
I like how you retreat to items that are not in dispute, to make it appear that you are establishing your contended point.I'm certain that Iran funds terrorist activities in Muslim majority countries.
... which you can tell because I am not dead ...Anywho... since you aren't a member of Hamas leadership in Gaza
Are you asking me to support common knowledge as your attention-diversion away from the fact that you refuse to support your affirmative claim of the totally absurd?or apart of the government leadership of Iran, which would potentially allow you to have first hand knowledge of your claim, I'm gonna need a source to support your claim....
Softly, softly catchee IBdeMonkey. 792.Nope, totally true, of course.
Have you noticed that you do nothing but delay?
(copy/paste)Are you too stupid for it to make sense?
I'm wearing a blue shirt. Give me a link for that.
Post the published agreement between Iran and Gaza's administrators.
Iran and Gaza's administrators never had any agreement or treaty ... unless you are going to show that one existed.
I like how you retreat to items that are not in dispute, to make it appear that you are establishing your contended point.
Of course Iran funds terrorism via their proxies. What you are absurdly claiming is that Iran decided to heavily fund Al Qassam but then decided to abdicate calling the shots, opting instead to let some broke public administrators in Gaza decide what Al Qassam should do. This is where you make a strong argument for this being the case, as opposed to expecting people to accept the totally absurd just because you say it is so.
... which you can tell because I am not dead ...
Are you asking me to support common knowledge as your attention-diversion away from the fact that you refuse to support your affirmative claim of the totally absurd?
Since what I am saying is common knowledge, I would point you to Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz who publicly announced having recovered documentation of Iran's funding arrangments for Al Qassam, Iran's proxy, to attack Israel on 7 October 2023. Nobody has any documentation indicating that Gaza's public administrators were even aware of the attack before it happened ... which means you have no reason to be lcaiming that Gaza's public administrators somehow knew of the attack before it happened.
It's not my ass that needs saving. You tried to slip a "The General Assembly overrules the Security Council" in there hoping no one would catch it. Well, I caught it and now you are desperate to save face. You got caught and now you are gibbering incoherently while drooling on your shoe.
You are a totally dishonest coward. You threw away any credibility you might have had and now you are practically begging for a "do over" ... while stupidly trying to blame me for your fuck-up. Yes, I will be reminding you constantly ... starting right now:
You are a totally dishonest coward. You threw away any credibility you might have had and now you are practically begging for a "do over" ... while stupidly trying to blame me for your fuck-up.
Too funny!
Nope, not in this quadrant.
I fully deny it. Proceed with showing me to be a lying asshold.
My reputation is solid. I'm the most ignored member of JPP ... next to Dutch-Dutch.
So your plan is to wait long enough for everyone to hopefully forget about your gaffe.
I'll be reminding the board periodically of your stupid error *and* of your double-down on stupid. You really ought to just go ahead and make your case now.
The really funny thing is that you are broadcasting how you know that you're egregiously mistaken.
Cum-bubble.. We can do this all day.
That which is no secret, and that which is common knowledge, is that the additional forum of discussion cannot overrule the legally binding Security Council resolutions. This leads to the question of how you do not know this, or whether you actually know anything in the first place.
Sure. I deny it some more. I fully acknowledge that you are incorrect. I recognize that you don't know the first thing about the UN. I recognize that you cannot distinguish between a militant terrorist organization serving Iran and Gaza's civilian administrators.
Just in case you missed it ... I deny it some more. I deny it some more. I deny it further still.
Feel free to throw it in my face.
Your question comes from where, exactly? Have I ever said Arab eyewitnesses should be dismissed outright? Are you twisting my point about Gaza residents? Do you genuinely believe Hamas’s iron grip on Gaza allows anyone to speak freely? Are you so naive as to think witnesses there aren’t painfully aware of what they can’t say without risking their lives?In what bigotry do you mistakenly believe that I am steeped? Oh wait, you're confusing my observations with my opinions again. I see. Well, I'll let you finish what you were saying.
I won't believe it as long as you cheer on the genocide of Arabs because the "chosen people" of your religion tell you to believe such.
Yet you negatively judge Arabs and summarily dismiss their eyewitness testimony ... because they are Arabs. At the same time, you absolutely OBEY the Israelites in whatever they tell you to think. I don't see any judging by actions; I see only your judging per Israeli fiat.
For the last 19 months, Israel has been slaughtering innocent Arabs who never attacked Israel, and you fight tooth and nail to justify this genocide by lying to yourself and to others at Israel's behest. Then you lash out at me and blame me for your hatred of Arabs. Smooth!
Your religion did.
... except you grew up fully understanding the Philistines are the "bad guys" in the world, and your job is to be a champion for the Israelites, i.e. for God's chosen people. You think it's perfectly OK to engage in special pleading fallacies that excuse Israel of any and all war crimes that are universally illegal for everyone else on the planet. Your enthusiastic support for a Nazi-style genocide is unconscionable ... quite a tribute to the religion that gave it to you.
Tell me again why Arab eyewitnesses must be summarily dismissed? Tell me again why Israeli terrorists must be universally believed? I'm all ears. Please explain why my willingness to listen to an Arab eyewitness equates to support for terrorism and to hatred for ... for whomever. Please explain why you never call boooooolsch't whenever anyone conflates Al Qassam, Iran's militant terrorist organization formed by Iran to destroy Israel, is conflated with Gaza's public administrators? Oh, that's right, that's Israel's direct disinformation that you must regurgitate.
I get it.
Bigotry is business-as-usual when one allows other people to do their thinking for him.
Let's talk about Arabs being slaughtered. Why is it OK with you? Why do you blame people OTHER THAN the Israelis who are doing the killing?
... or at least you think you can, but you can't spot your own.
Sure. Let's make sure to include the eyewitnesses to the stolen 2020 election.
... which is usually just observations, because I base all my "points of view" on observations.
This is where you get to explain how my observations equate to antisemitism on my part.
This is where you get to explain how observations equate to abandoned logic in favor of the talking points of dead people.
So explain to me why you don't believe that the 2020 election was stolen.
Tell me this isn't bigotry right here.
Common sense says that your bigotry is not common sense.
Why do you believe that there is only one current narrative?
... because they are all Arab, right? You made it a point that Israelis in Gaza are trustworthy. Why is that?
That the IDF is the world's most active terrorist organization on the planet, having killed tens of thousands of innocent Arabs who never attacked Israel, simply out of RACIST hatred, and of genocidal mania by the Likud Party, ... is an observation, not propaganda.
Remind me again why the Arab survivors of such attacks, who lost family members or were severely injured themselves, are somehow unreliable as to what happened because they are Arab. I can understand why the deceased are poor eyewitnesses, though.
Newsflash: there is more than one video in the world.
Newsflash: the world has ALL the videos.
Was there a video in particular to which you refer? Could you just post it?
Post those videos as well. I'll see if I can dig up some of the many RACIST Israeli videos taunting Arabs (who never attacked Israel) with an imminent 2nd Nakba (ethnic cleansing) and other horrendous videos.
You can't accurately recount any argument of mine on this topic. All you can do is deny inconvenient observations as somehow being my mere opinions.
I don't obsess over any supposed evils. Your contradiction, however, of both denying the genocide of Arabs while simultaneously cheering it on, is what needs to be explained. Actually you have so many things that need to be explained but you only pivot.
This is where you get to point out where I have spoken about "Jews" in general.
You obviously don't understand how this whole internet thing works. You are the one who has to support your positions; I am not obligated to prove your affirmative assertions false. I can rebut your absurdities if I wish, but I am not required, especially if you can't/won't support them in the first place.
I hate seven specific people.
Nope. We have already started with your double standard that you have not adequately explained. Why should Arab eyewitnesses be summarily dismissed yet Zionist terrorists are not to be questioned.
Believe it or not, it comes from me.Your question comes from where, exactly?
So now you want to join the intellectual cowards of the board and plead the "I never said what I spent an entire post saying."Have I ever said Arab eyewitnesses should be dismissed outright?
Nope. You have been flat out denying observations. I can't help you.I’ve been giving you the slimmest benefit of the doubt,
Oh, I see that clearly.And yes, I know how this online game works
... if you want to be honest or not ... no, that's not how it works.I choose if I want to play or not, if I want to answer or not,
You are the one with an agenda. I am simply making observations.Not to sound cold but I don’t care about your agenda,
Yep, you're a moron.I wanted to know if you’re one of a fairly unique group of people who thinks through societal issues, digs into the facts, applies logic to generally find the correct answers, yet throws that methodology out the window for bigotry. From where I’m standing, that’s exactly what you’ve done, unless I’ve somehow missed your denial of anti-Semitism.
All the Team Israel bigots are in lock-step with their HATRED. They make the same special pleading fallacy, they lie at every opportunity to keep the genocide of Arabs at full steam, and they attack those who want the Zionist terrorists to stop ethnically cleansing the Arabs who never did anything to them.Most anti-Semites I’ve encountered don’t bother denying it,
Hey, tell Into the Night that you don't know what a "fact" is. He'll help you out.they’re convinced history and facts back them up.
I know what word antisemitic means. You do not. You think it means what the Israelis tell you to think it means. I don't OBEY Israelis.Is that why you haven’t just said, “I’m not anti-Semitic”?
Well, that certainly was a loser of a run-on sentence. Either you don't read English for comprehension or you are deliberately pivoting the hell away from the topic of your double standard. I don't think that horse should be beaten any further, but if you disagree and need to revisit how you have one standard for "God's chosen people" and a totally different standard for the Arabs you HATE, let me know and we can do a deep dive on it.Instead, you create a Red Herring in the form of changing my skepticism of eyewitness credibility in Gaza with me supposedly saying that you can believe any Arabian's eyewitness account, a libtard drone tactic by the way.
You want to be crystal clear for once? OK. I've got to see this.Let’s be crystal clear:
That was one very clear pivot. I have to give credit where it is due. The topic is not my stance on anything. The topic is your double standard on eyewitnesses based on whether or not they are Arab.If you’ve got evidence of some credible eyewitness you've been using to justify your stance,
You have been deliberately wrong on this issue since you joined the discussion. You are not honest. You HATE Arabs. You are thrilled by their genocide. You attack those who have a distaste for Zionist terrorists killing Arabs who never attacked Israel.If I'm wrong my sincere apologies,
You tried to slip a "The General Assembly overrules the Security Council" in there hoping no one would catch it.
I fully deny it. Proceed with showing me to be a lying asshold.
Sure. I deny it some more.