Supreme Court sides with religious parents who want to avoid LGBTQ+ books in public schools

Earl

Well-known member

Supreme Court sides with religious parents who want to avoid LGBTQ+ books in public schools​

Portrait of Maureen Groppe Maureen Groppe
USA TODAY

WASHINGTON − The Supreme Court on June 27 sided with a group of parents who want to withdraw their elementary school children from class when storybooks with LGBTQ+ characters are being read, another move that favors claims of religious discrimination over other values, like gay rights.

In a 6-3 decision that divided along ideological lines, the court said a Maryland public school district’s refusal to allow opt-outs burdens parents’ First Amendment right to freely exercise their religion.

Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito said the court has long recognized the rights of parents to direct their children's religious upbringing.

The books, he said, "unmistakably convey a particular viewpoint about same-sex marriage and gender."
 
Last edited:
Another big win for President Trump and all moral Americans.

A big loss for the trans-freaks trying to groom children.
 
Winning, winning, winning!

The Supreme Court sided Friday with a group of Maryland parents who object to their children reading LGBTQ+-inclusive books in public schools, delivering a win to religious liberty advocates and potentially altering the course of public education nationwide.
 
Oh, dear - you don't seem to understand what the word "pornography" means....

pornography​

noun

por·nog·ra·phy pȯr-ˈnä-grə-fē

1
: the depiction of erotic behavior (as in pictures or writing) intended to cause sexual excitement



Trans people dancing prancing around half naked spreading the legs bending over in front of kids is erotic behavior

Gay pride parades are full of erotic behavior on display
 
Back
Top