Poor Mark Carney of CanaDUH........

[Into the Night]

Those naughty naughty lefties.

Yup.

 

[Into the Night]

So your data is very subjective.

Apparently you don't know what 'subjective' means. Go learn English. Data is never subjective.

 

[Into the Night]

Most of the right wingers have spent a lifetime learning to siphon news from sources that are tilted away from them. Some of them do get excited about having some sources that are right wing, but in reality, those that want a discussion almost invariably have to find a source that leftists say they will "trust" otherwise all they get are you folks saying exactly what you said here. Sure, some folks post here for entertainment and do not care what you have to say about their sources, will argue that their source is "better" etc. but if you look at threads that have a long half life, the ones with tons of posts... if they begin from a right winger it will have a source your side has "blessed", the same post from a different source would have 3 responses from leftists about the source rather than the idea or information and there would be no discussion.

What is hilarious is that even if you quote something from CNN, Democrats will claim it's from FOX News.

 

[Into the Night]

You do realize that the digital services tax has nothing to do with farmers, and it was 3%, not 400%, and levied against anyone doing business in a Canada not just Americans. Why does Trump have to always lie

He didn't.

This tax, which most nations have, was added during Covid,

The tax was added recently, anchovies.

and at the moment, there are proposals worldwide to lessen or do away with it internationally, eliminating it isn’t a big deal, which is why Trump has to throw in all the lies in his text.

It was a big deal, since Canada rescinded the tax due to Trump demands. You are also making it a big deal.

Wasn’t a whole lot “won” other than a sign Canada is open for formal talks, which surely have been going on quietly since Trump began his tariff idiocy

Trump was clear. No negotiations as long as that tax was in place.
400% tariff by Canada is idiocy.

Comical how Trump has made Canada, Canada, America’s longest and greatest ally for over centuries, who we share the longest undefended border in the world today, a public enemy.

They aren't a public enemy, anchovies.

Welcome to MAGA

Hell yeah! It's what I voted for, and Trump is doing it!

 

[Into the Night]

Aren't you kinda twisting and distorting what I posted

No, he isn't.

 

[Into the Night]

Most liberals don't deal in echo chambers. If we did, MSNBC would be the top-rated news outlet.

To you, it is...just like CNN.

 

[Into the Night]

You're getting a little too kiss ass here. Who exactly are you basing this on? The threads that get the most reaction from left-wingers and centrists do so because of how bogus and childish their sources are. There are countless sources that leftists would trust, but half the time the sources are the same rehashed ones. If you had an example of a right-winger using good sourcing practices, I'm sure the forum would love to see it

It's already happened. The usual Democrat response is to ignore it and discard it, or blame it on FOX.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Most liberals don't deal in echo chambers. If we did, MSNBC would be the top-rated news outlet.

Most people aren't liberals (aka Progressives / Leftists). MSNBC is starting out with a possible audience of less than 20% of the population and going downhill from there.

 

[gfm7175]

Translation: Damocles was correct in what he said.

 

[Trumpet]

Translation: Damocles was correct in what he said.

Your sense of perception is rather distorted, therefore you need to seek help.

 

[gfm7175]

Dude you got a stick up your butt,

Immediately with the personal insults...

and have a bogus and biased attitude.

His attitude is truthful.

You're

** Your **

broad brush approach to liberals will only work with the MAGAts.

... same as your broad brush approach to "MAGAts" will only work with the liberals?

I've more often than not seen right-wingers posting from biased or downright jilted sources.

... yet you've never ever seen left-wingers posting from biased or downright jilted sources?

The biggest example is Ziggy, who only posts random tweets as news.

At this point, I consider a "random tweet" to be a better source of information than any of the major media outlets in their current forms. At least a "random tweet" might possibly be telling the truth. Almost all that the major media outlets do at this point in time is lie and manipulate.

TDAK, Volsrock post from sewer internet sources.

What is a "sewer internet source"?

I could go on but I don't want to waste my time describing every poster on JPP. Reversely, I only occasionally see the jilted sources from the left-wingers. Maybe the occasional Daily KO but that's about it.

 

[gfm7175]

There are countless sources that leftists would trust,

Such as?

If you had an example of a right-winger using good sourcing practices, I'm sure the forum would love to see it

A good source depends upon the specific situation. If the discussion is about "climate change", then a good source would be science itself (e.g, the laws of thermodynamics and their specific equations). A bad source would be a government agency press release or a Scientific American article.

If the discussion is about something that President Trump said, then a good source would be Trump's words themselves. A bad source would be a news article claiming that "sources familiar with the matter" said that Trump said such and such.

If the discussion is about what the Constitution says, then a good source would be the Constitution itself. A bad source would be a major news network correspondent or a so-called "constitutional expert" who the network is interviewing.

 

[gfm7175]

What is hilarious is that even if you quote something from CNN, Democrats will claim it's from FOX News.

Damo eluded to this already, but the ones that I particularly love are the ones where a FOX News article is quoted but FOX News is just spreading what the AP (or some other leftist source) said but lefties get all riled up and dismiss it because it is "from FOX News".

I also love it whenever specific video evidence of some event is being discussed, and someone links to a FOX News article that includes the video footage that he/she wishes to discuss, and then lefties immediately flood the thread with responses similar to "FOX News?? " They just see the words "FOX News" and immediately run their reject.exe programming instead of realizing that FOX News isn't actually the source re: what is being discussed.

 

[gfm7175]

Your sense of perception is rather distorted, therefore you need to seek help.

 

[archives]

He didn't.

The tax was added recently, anchovies.

It was a big deal, since Canada rescinded the tax due to Trump demands. You are also making it a big deal.

Trump was clear. No negotiations as long as that tax was in place.
400% tariff by Canada is idiocy.


They aren't a public enemy, anchovies.

Hell yeah! It's what I voted for, and Trump is doing it!

Yeah, he just threw farmers in the post for the fun of it

Wrong

Wrong again, it was already on its way out, the EU nations have been eliminating it amongst themselves for the last year

But everyone knows TACO

Right, you always call your friends “enemies,” “threats,” “rip off” artist, etc, strange world Trumpkinville

Shocker

 

[Into the Night]

Your sense of perception is rather distorted, therefore you need to seek help.

Inversion fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

What is a "sewer internet source"?

Something from the septic tank of Darknet?

 

[Into the Night]

Yeah, he just threw farmers in the post for the fun of it

Farmers are not in a post. They are in the field, working.

Wrong

The tax was added recently, anchovies. You can't make it otherwise.

Wrong again, it was already on its way out, the EU nations have been eliminating it amongst themselves for the last year

Canada is not a European nation. It's in America, anchovies.

But everyone knows TACO

Tacos are food. I fixed 'em just yesterday.

Right, you always call your friends “enemies,” “threats,” “rip off” artist, etc, strange world Trumpkinville

Why would I call a friend an enemy, anchovies?

 

[Into the Night]

Such as?

A good source depends upon the specific situation. If the discussion is about "climate change", then a good source would be science itself (e.g, the laws of thermodynamics and their specific equations). A bad source would be a government agency press release or a Scientific American article.

If the discussion is about something that President Trump said, then a good source would be Trump's words themselves. A bad source would be a news article claiming that "sources familiar with the matter" said that Trump said such and such.

If the discussion is about what the Constitution says, then a good source would be the Constitution itself. A bad source would be a major news network correspondent or a so-called "constitutional expert" who the network is interviewing.

Since Democrats deny theories of science, to them a theory of science is not a source.
Since Democrats deny Trump's sources, to them what Trump supposedly said can only be obtained to someone being selective or just fabricating shit.
Since Democrats deny the Constitution of the United States, they can't use it as a source.

 

[archives]

Farmers are not in a post. They are in the field, working.

The tax was added recently, anchovies. You can't make it otherwise.

Canada is not a European nation. It's in America, anchovies.

Tacos are food. I fixed 'em just yesterday.

Why would I call a friend an enemy, anchovies?

Given the first response above couldn’t be any more wrong (“they have charged our farmers”), there’s no value in continuing on with the rest, their equally bogus