Dershowitz says he knows Epstein client list names: ‘But I’m bound by confidentiality’

Biden released his entire physicals to the public every year. Kamala released hers to Trump has never done that. He has been in complete control of them since he managed to not fall down the escalator. There has to be an explanation, and it cannot be good.
 
Damo : Dems never raised the idea they would be against ICE agents with masks using unmarked vans to round up migrants and US citizens while Biden was in so they should not be critical of Trump doing it now.


#Stupidity
 
Nordberg said:
Biden released his entire physicals to the public every year. Kamala released hers to Trump has never done that. He has been in complete control of them since he managed to not fall down the escalator. There has to be an explanation, and it cannot be good.
Click to expand...
Bu..bu…but he aced his cognitive exam and can tell the difference between a giraffe and a whale!
 
Cypress said:
^^^ MAGA and QaNon used to howl from the rooftops that the public had a right to know of there were paedophiles in the government.

Why the sudden massive flip flop just since inauguration day January 20?
Click to expand...
Got me. I'm neither and really don't give a shit about either. The only reason YOU care is GET TRUMP! That's it with you. Everything else about this is irrelevant to you.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Are you not aware that it is his followers, the MAGATs, who are incensed about the failure to release The List? It's not Democrats. Mostly we don't care because even if Trump was the #1 Sex Island client and was boinking 10 year olds and puppies, you all don't care.
Click to expand...
Don't care. This is about GET TRUMP! With you, and nothing else. If Trump weren't involved, it'd be irrelevant to you.
 
Damocles said:
Braindead would only have made it a promise if you all actually wanted it. Basically, it is a self-fulfilling thing... If you had been demanding it from Trump before he ran against him, it would have been something he "deeply cared" about... we might even have read them by now. I think we would have regardless if it actually had evidence against Trump as it would have just been another brick in the "wall of selective justice" erected by the Braindead Administration.
Click to expand...

Damocles said:
Braindead would only have made it a promise if you all actually wanted it. Basically, it is a self-fulfilling thing... If you had been demanding it from Trump before he ran against him, it would have been something he "deeply cared" about... we might even have read them by now. I think we would have regardless if it actually had evidence against Trump as it would have just been another brick in the "wall of selective justice" erected by the Braindead Administration.
Click to expand...
My point is that TACO did make it a promise because that’s what his voters wanted.

TACO could have done it in his first administration, I guess he’s the one who erected the wall you are referring to…

Try to stay consistent!
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Don't care. This is about GET TRUMP! With you, and nothing else. If Trump weren't involved, it'd be irrelevant to you.
Click to expand...
why shouldn't Trump be called out for such a massive hypocrisy and covering up for a Pedophile?

Why are you not bothered about the cover up on behalf of pedophile that has followed this path:

- Government is hiding Epstein files, Elect me and i will release them all. this is important and you should care about it.
- ok i am elected but there is nothing here and why do you guys cares?

- ok there is something here but it is all just files faked by Obama and Comey and Hillary and i am not going to allow you guys to see any of it


If you did not have TDS Terry you would find it wrong that Trump is NOW admitting the files do exist that he promised to expose prior to getting elected but the reason he won't release this is Obama and Hillary.

Do you buy that? And how did Trump not know that from his first term before promising to release them going in to this election.
 
Jarod said:
S

so you no longer care about who was with Epstein?
Click to expand...
it is that he no longer cares because Trump put out the command to loyal magats to not care.

This issue is far more serious than anything Hunter Biden was accused of and yet Terry could not get enough that.

Now we have Ghislaine Maxwell going to jail for a crime prosecuted by the DoJ that Trump is saying is based entirely on fake Doj files created by Obama and Hillary.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Got me. I'm neither and really don't give a shit about either. The only reason YOU care is GET TRUMP! That's it with you. Everything else about this is irrelevant to you.
Click to expand...
T. A. Gardner said:
Don't care. This is about GET TRUMP! With you, and nothing else. If Trump weren't involved, it'd be irrelevant to you.
Click to expand...
I support public execution of convicted pedophiles, but JPP MAGAts claimed I was being mean. LOL
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Don't care. This is about GET TRUMP! With you, and nothing else. If Trump weren't involved, it'd be irrelevant to you.
Click to expand...
Donald Trump Jr. &
@DonaldJTrumpJr


Show us all the Epstein client list now!!! Why would anyone protect those scum bags?


Ask yourselves this question daily and the answer becomes very apparent!!


9:27 AM • July 8, 2023
 
Dutch Uncle said:
I support public execution of convicted pedophiles, but JPP MAGAts claimed I was being mean. LOL
Click to expand...
Because I cannot be certain that free will exists,
and thus cannot be certain that actual guilt exists,
I cannot support punitive execution at all.

I know that I fantasize about trumpanzees being boiled alive in oil.
You don't have to remind me.
Saying that actually makes me feel better,
and that makes it worth saying.

In reality, though, I don't support punishment as a concept.
I support rehabilitation in the very rare instances that such may be possible.
Usually, people are socially deficient because they are genetically impaire,
and science has a long way to go dealing with that.

Mostly, though, I support humane euthanasia.
People aren't genetically deficient through fault of their own
but they are nonetheless incompatible for existing with civilized people of actual value.

They should be excised in as humane a way as possible.

Also, vengeance is a personal responsibility,
and sometimes we must have retribution,
whether actual guilt exists or not.

The state should not be remotely involved in that.
I obviously believe in comprehensive government,
but revenge is the responsibility of the aggrieved, not the state.
The state's responsibility is only expedient and humane removal.
 
Jarod said:
My point is that TACO did make it a promise because that’s what his voters wanted.

TACO could have done it in his first administration, I guess he’s the one who erected the wall you are referring to…

Try to stay consistent!
Click to expand...
No, that was all Braindead Administration activity. I'm certain you heard it called "lawfare"...
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Because I cannot be certain that free will exists,
and thus cannot be certain that actual guilt exists,
I cannot support punitive execution at all.

I know that I fantasize about trumpanzees being boiled alive in oil.
You don't have to remind me.
Saying that actually makes me feel better,
and that makes it worth saying.

In reality, though, I don't support punishment as a concept.
I support rehabilitation in the very rare instances that such may be possible.
Usually, people are socially deficient because they are genetically impaire,
and science has a long way to go dealing with that.

Mostly, though, I support humane euthanasia.
People aren't genetically deficient through fault of their own
but they are nonetheless incompatible for existing with civilized people of actual value.

They should be excised in as humane a way as possible.

Also, vengeance is a personal responsibility,
and sometimes we must have retribution,
whether actual guilt exists or not.

The state should not be remotely involved in that.
I obviously believe in comprehensive government,
but revenge is the responsibility of the aggrieved, not the state.
The state's responsibility is only expedient and humane removal.
Click to expand...
If there’s no free will then we’re all just ambulatory meat computers. Pedos would be defective meat computers. I support turning them off permanently. No loss.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top