Extremely high heat in the South....Was this caused by Man-Made gases and Cow Farts?

gmark77 said:
. . . .Politicizing it is the only way to force people like you to do the right thing . . . .
Click to expand...

That is PROOF that you dont know SHIT about science OR democracy.

Who the FUCK do you think you are, "force people like you to do the right thing." Fuck you Nazi dictator!

You would not know the "right thing" if it bit you in your sorry Marxist ass.

giphy.gif
 
gmark77 said:
No one said it was. But science is a whole lot more likely to be correct than just your guess.



This is a common mistake among the non-scientists. The peaks ain't the important bit: it's the overall trend which has been steadily increasing EXACTLY as predicted.





Yes we can. Isotopes. 13-C and 12-C in the atmospheric CO2. Interestingly enough as CO2 concentration increases the 12-C (lighter isotope) of Carbon is enriched which is, again, exactly as one would expect from the burning of gigatons of fossil fuels.

Besides humans produce 100X more CO2 than volcanoes. (You surely don't think we have no clue how much CO2 we generate, do you?)



And it is because of THAT science that we know the CURRENT warming is not dominated by natural forcings but is dominated by human activities.

If we didn't know as much as we do about the past history of earth's climate we wouldn't understand that important fact.



Orbital obliquity.



Politicizing it is the only way to force people like you to do the right thing. People like you who have no science but think you disagree with science you don't understand.
Click to expand...

None of those articles I posted was a "guess." They came from reputable sources.

Exactly as predicted? Well, we ain't dead yet, but we were supposed to be by now.

No, there is no way to measure what we, as humans, have put in the atmosphere. It cannot be measured.
A volcano releases more than just CO2. Even the ocean bottom produces an immeasurable amount of methane.

"Orbital obliquity" answers your next two statements, no?

Right there it is. "Politicizing it is the only way to force people like you (me) to do the right thing."
Rest assured, I won't be giving up my ground pounding, gas guzzling, big block hot rod any time
soon for some electric car. Or my push mower and weed whacker, for that matter.
What makes science any better to understand than the science of 50 years ago?
Again, I think you've answered your own remarks that "Orbital obliquity" can have
an effect on climate. As for CO2, the increased human population over the years
produces more CO2, no? So cow farts aren't the only producers of "greenhouse gasses."
 
RB 60 said:
None of those articles I posted was a "guess." They came from reputable sources.

Exactly as predicted? Well, we ain't dead yet, but we were supposed to be by now.

No, there is no way to measure what we, as humans, have put in the atmosphere. It cannot be measured.
A volcano releases more than just CO2. Even the ocean bottom produces an immeasurable amount of methane.

"Orbital obliquity" answers your next two statements, no?

Right there it is. "Politicizing it is the only way to force people like you (me) to do the right thing."
Rest assured, I won't be giving up my ground pounding, gas guzzling, big block hot rod any time
soon for some electric car. Or my push mower and weed whacker, for that matter.
What makes science any better to understand than the science of 50 years ago?
Again, I think you've answered your own remarks that "Orbital obliquity" can have
an effect on climate. As for CO2, the increased human population over the years
produces more CO2, no? So cow farts aren't the only producers of "greenhouse gasses."
Click to expand...

LOL. Try reading SCIENCE.
 
RB 60 said:
Maybe, but it also proves science isn't always correct.? The few heat records we've broken over the last several years were set back as far as the 30s.
There's no way we can measure the amount of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases human activity has put into the atmosphere without factoring in volcanic and other natural forms of "greenhouse gases."

It's been shown that the earth's climate has been changing for hundreds, even thousands of years.
What caused, then melted, the ice age? Lots of creatures have gone extinct before the industrial revolution.
Nothing's in it for me. I am not politicizing it, it's the left who are politicizing it.
CA has banned push mowers and weed whackers. Talk about politicizing it...
Click to expand...

lol and they never criticize their masters, the Red Chinese. Who need gas masks to take walks in Peking and never once abided by any of these 'global environmental initiatives. They only obsess over what obstructs and weakens the U.S., magically.

It's okay, though, they're not white proles.

AI Overview

Artist Ai Weiwei dons gas mask as severe pollution continues ...
In China, particularly in areas with severe air pollution, gas masks and respirators, especially those meeting N95 or similar standards, are used by some individuals to mitigate the health risks associated with breathing polluted air. This practice is more common in urban centers and industrial regions where pollution levels are frequently high.


This video shows people in China wearing face masks and discusses the reasons behind it, including air pollution and concerns about spreading germs:
1753930655183.jpeg
 
RB 60 said:
It was wrong before...
Click to expand...

I believe what the poster posted was nothing more than NEWSPAPER stories written by JOURNALISTS not scientists. I tend to prefer to get my science from actual SCIENTISTS directly. IT requires more skill to be able to read science in journals but even you could learn if you applied yourself.
 
Have any of these lefties claim that it is science that claims men can have babies, or that men can be females?

What do you say there gmark? Should we always believe in the science that you lefties rely on?
 
Libhater said:
Have any of these lefties claim that it is science that claims men can have babies, or that men can be females?

What do you say there gmark? Should we always believe in the science that you lefties rely on?
Click to expand...

Ummm, Dr. LIbhater, I will refer you to the TITLE of the OP. If you are interested in sex stuff then please start your own thread. I am not interested in the kind of stuff that animates you.

Thanks in advance.
 
gmark77 said:
Ummm, Dr. LIbhater, I will refer you to the TITLE of the OP. If you are interested in sex stuff then please start your own thread. I am not interested in the kind of stuff that animates you.

Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...

So it looks like you're not all that sure that science or leftist beliefs that human or cow distribution of natural gases is responsible
for those high temperatures in the South. So, do you still believe in the science and in the Green New Scam advocates that humans
are responsible for those high temperatures in the South?
 
Libhater said:
So it looks like you're not all that sure that science or leftist beliefs that human or cow distribution of natural gases is responsible
for those high temperatures in the South. So, do you still believe in the science and in the Green New Scam advocates that humans
are responsible for those high temperatures in the South?
Click to expand...

I get it. You can't possibly talk about the science of climate because you don't know any. What you know are Right Wing Talking Points from Fox and OANN.

I'll be glad to talk about the OP and the science related to it. Just as soon as ANYONE shows up who can carry on a knowledgeable conversation on the topic.
 
gmark77 said:
I believe what the poster posted was nothing more than NEWSPAPER stories written by JOURNALISTS not scientists. I tend to prefer to get my science from actual SCIENTISTS directly. IT requires more skill to be able to read science in journals but even you could learn if you applied yourself.
Click to expand...

Where do you think those NEWSPAPER stories written by JOURNALISTS came from?
You claim you know science and I don't, but what makes your claims any more reputable
than what scientists were saying back in the early 70s? Or what they are saying today?
 
RB 60 said:
Where do you think those NEWSPAPER stories written by JOURNALISTS came from?
Click to expand...

Often limited understanding of technical details on the part of journalists who are not necessarily trained in that particular science.

If you want to talk, say the 1970's "global cooling" thing then you'll have to accept the fact that in the 1970's those scientific papers predicting WARMING outnumbered those predicting COOLING by 6:1.

1970s_papers.gif

(Peterson 2008)

So there you go! Demonstrated easily and clearly even for you.


 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top