鬼百合
One day we will wake to his obituary :-)
oh lord, sounds like a story.
LGBTQ rights in Russia
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Nope. LGBT is a supremacist movement that claims eternal victimhood.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Exactly. Straight people aren't assuming supremacy while crying "I'm being VICTIMIZED!" Straight people aren't performing sex in public in front of other people's children.
Yakuda
Verified User
I suspect Russia doesn't give a shit what your opinion is.Didn't think I'd do a thread on this, but in order to try to avoid talking too much about the subject in another thread I made, I've decided to give it a go. I'll start with Wikipedia's article on the subject, which can be seen here:
LGBTQ rights in Russia - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I'll now quote the first paragraph of said article:
**
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in Russia face significant legal and social challenges not experienced by non-LGBT people. Although sexual activity between consenting adults of the same sex is legal, homosexuality is disapproved of by much of the population and pro-LGBTQ advocacy groups are deemed "extremist" and banned. It is illegal for individuals to "promote homosexuality" and same-sex couples and households headed by same-sex couples are ineligible for the legal protections available to opposite-sex couples. Russia provides no anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQ people and does not have a designation for hate crimes based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Transgender people are not allowed to change their legal gender and all gender-affirming care is banned. There are currently no laws prohibiting discrimination based on gender identity or expression, and recent laws could be used to discriminate against transgender residents. Russian sexologists are legally required to conduct "conversion therapies".
Russia has long held strongly negative views regarding homosexuality, with recent polls indicating that a majority of Russians are against the acceptance of homosexuality and have shown support for laws discriminating against homosexuals. Despite receiving international criticism for the recent increase in social discrimination, crimes, and violence against homosexuals, larger cities such as Moscow and Saint Petersburg have been said to have a thriving LGBTQ community. However, there has been a historic resistance to gay pride parades by local governments; despite being fined by the European Court of Human Rights in 2010 for interpreting it as discrimination, the city of Moscow denied 100 individual requests for permission to hold Moscow Pride through 2012, citing a risk of violence against participants. In 2016, Russia was rated the second least LGBT-friendly nation in Europe by ILGA-Europe. In 2024, the status of LGBTQ rights in Russia was ranked the worst out of the 49 countries surveyed within Europe.
**
So, here are the things that I don't agree with in regards to Russia here:
1- That much of the population disapproves of homosexuality.
2- That pro-LGBTQ advocacy groups are deemed "extremist" and banned.
3- I think some clarity needs to be provided as to what, exactly, is deemed as promoting homsexuality, so I'll leave that one for now, but I definitely think that same-sex couples and households headed by same-sex couples should be able to get the legal protections available to opposite-sex couples.
4- I think that Russia should have anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQ people.
5- I think Russia should have a designation for hate crimes based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
6- I think that transgender people should be able to change their gender and be able to get gender-affirming care, though only if they are adults and perhaps also after they've passed a test determining that they aren't just going through a phase of some sort.
7- Sexologists shouldn't be legally required to conduct conversion therapies. I know that the U.S. has generally gone the other way. From Wikipedia's page on the history of conversion therapy:
**
21st century
United States Surgeon General David Satcher in 2001 issued a report stating that "there is no valid scientific evidence that sexual orientation can be changed". The same year, a study by Robert Spitzer concluded that some highly motivated individuals whose orientation is predominantly homosexual can become predominantly heterosexual with some form of reparative therapy. Spitzer based his findings on structured interviews with 200 self-selected individuals (143 men, 57 women). He told The Washington Post that the study "shows some people can change from gay to straight, and we ought to acknowledge that". Spitzer's study caused controversy and attracted media attention. Spitzer recanted his study in 2012, and apologized to the gay community for making unproven claims of the efficacy of reparative therapy, calling it his only professional regret.
The American Psychoanalytic Association spoke against NARTH in 2004, stating "that organization does not adhere to our policy of nondiscrimination and [...] their activities are demeaning to our members who are gay and lesbian". The same year, a survey of members of the American Psychological Association rated reparative therapy as "certainly discredited", though the authors warn that the results should be interpreted carefully as an initial step, not as a final deliberation.
The American Psychological Association in 2007 convened a task force to evaluate its policies regarding reparative therapy.
In 2008, the organizers of an APA panel on the relationship between religion and homosexuality canceled the event after gay activists objected that "conversion therapists and their supporters on the religious right use these appearances as a public relations event to try and legitimize what they do".
In 2009, American Psychological Association stated that it "encourages mental health professionals to avoid misrepresenting the efficacy of sexual orientation change efforts by promoting or promising change in sexual orientation when providing assistance to individuals distressed by their own or others' sexual orientation and concludes that the benefits reported by participants in sexual orientation change efforts can be gained through approaches that do not attempt to change sexual orientation".
The ethics guidelines of major mental health organizations in the United States vary from cautionary statements to recommendations that conversion therapy be prohibited (American Psychiatric Association) to recommendations against referring patients to those who practice it (American Counseling Association). In a letter dated 23 February 2011 to the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, the Attorney General of the United States stated "while sexual orientation carries no visible badge, a growing scientific consensus accepts that sexual orientation is a characteristic that is immutable".
Gay rights groups and other groups concerned with mental health fear that reparative therapy can increase the chances of depression and suicide. President Barack Obama expressed opposition to the practice in 2015.
**
Source:
History of conversion therapy - Wikipedia
Yakuda
Verified User
We know yours. You're a leftist retard.
Yakuda
Verified User
Hardly compelling. Mardi gras and spring break are alcohol fuel idiocy by morons seeking attention. Oh wait that is pretty compelling. Never mind.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
So every LGBT person claims "Eternal victimhood"?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You have piss-poor English reading comprehension, but now I am repeating myself. LGBT is a movement, one that claims eternal victimhood.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
LGBT is a bunch of people. You keep attaching movement to it where there is none. You are blaming the LGBT folks for a few bad apples.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
LGBT is a movement. Yes, that involves multiple people. It's a movement.
Your attempts to inflict your own denial onto others has failed.
All in the LGBT movement are bad apples. As long as they advocate for, and protect, their own supremacy, they injure society and harm children. Fuck them.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Your so called movement includes a few bad apples. You chose to be outraged over LGBT folks based on those bad apples.
I am reminded that the best WNBA player takes tons of shit for being white.....the best player in the WNBA can not be white.....this is not allowed.
Same with traditional value straights.....they must be inferior in the new world order....restorative justice our abusers call this.
Same with traditional value straights.....they must be inferior in the new world order....restorative justice our abusers call this.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You so-called "few" is far too many to count.
I was outraged by behavior and the supremacy that is pushed by the LGBT movement, and that involves countless people.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
You have no evidence that it's "countless".
The case with the cake baker is not "countless".
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You have no count thereof.
Correct. You just made an irrelevant pivot.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
You agree that it is not countless. Small steps.
LGBT is merely people. You assign movement to those individuals. You accuse those individuals of claiming to be "Eternal victims" with no proof at all except for those few rotten apples.
Do you deny the history of violence against the LGBT?
proud PETA member
Verified User
I don't give a squirt of piss who does what behind closed doors. I do however, have a problem with illegal activity being tolerated on taxpayer funded streets and in public places. I don't know what cave ya'll live in, but here in flyover country we call that indecent exposure and you will be prosecuted. Just because you're proud of your lessadicktomy surgery does not give you the right to wave around the remaining nutsack in public. What is so fucking hard to comprehend about this?
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
So don't go there. Simple.
proud PETA member
Verified User
So the crime is OK and it's on me to just avoid it. Yes, so simple. I wouldn't expect much more from you.