Hmmm.

[Dutch Uncle]

Oh give me a break. How many fucking children have died in mass shootings that were preventable and this prick says it’s worth it to preserve his extremist 2A views? I’m not being remotely as insensitive as Kirk was, for example, toward the families of Sandy Hook victims.

I wasn’t seeking laughs either. It is ironic that he died while defending his opposition to reasonable gun control. Something that if reasonable controls were in place he’d probably still be alive to debate them.

I’ve also have clearly stated that I clearly denounce this sort of violence and the culprit when found should have a fair trial and a hanging.

So I’m not crying crocodile tears for a person who advocated appalling extremist policies. Kirk was clearly a bigot of the worst order but even he did not deserve to be assassinated for his speech and political beliefs.

So try coming out from under your rock and see the world objectively for what is really happening in this country and tell me why I should be sympathetic towards an extremist who himself advocated violence?

As I heard a wise man once say, "What goes around, comes around, mutha fucka!"

 

[Mott the Hoople]

That can happen even if you try to avoid the danger. Perhaps he believed that setting an example and showing that some things are larger and more important than an individual was the better path. While he worked in what he called the "macro" his message was that there is no excuse for you not to work in the micro to your utmost, do what you believe, act to make it happen. His path may not have been for everybody, but I hope there are enough willing to take up that mantle that what he started doesn't end. Non-violent dialog between those that disagree really is the only path to what makes America the place we want it to be.

I hope like hell they don’t. I’d be one of the first they would put up against a wall and shoot for denouncing an extremist bigot like Kirk and I do thoroughly denounce the political policies Kirk advocated.

 

[TOP]

That can happen even if you try to avoid the danger. Perhaps he believed that setting an example and showing that some things are larger and more important than an individual was the better path. While he worked in what he called the "macro" his message was that there is no excuse for you not to work in the micro to your utmost, do what you believe, act to make it happen. His path may not have been for everybody, but I hope there are enough willing to take up that mantle that what he started doesn't end. Non-violent dialog between those that disagree really is the only path to what makes America the place we want it to be.

There are many who will carry on his message... That's already begun...

 

[Dutch Uncle]

But being executed for those beliefs should clearly not be one of them. Being as asshole is not a death penalty offense.

Correct. Only those adjucated in a court of law should be sentenced to death and only for the most heinous crimes.

Extrajudicial murders are W-R-O-N-G regardless if it's Democrats in Minnesota or a bunch of smugglers in international waters.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/07/us/vance-boelter-minnesota-lawmakers-shot

Trump personally ordered Navy to bomb drug boat

Donald Trump personally ordered a lethal strike on a suspected drug boat that killed 11 Venezuelan gangsters.

www.yahoo.com

 

[Damocles]

There are many who will carry on his message... That's already begun...

I'd volunteer, but nobody wants to hear an old fat man speak at a university. They have to do that too often in class.

 

[cawacko]

Conservatives used to be big into "personal responsibility." He's responsible for his words and their effects. Whether or not he really believed that tripe he spewed doesn't matter. He spewed it to make money and a name for himself. Some people seem to struggle with the concept that free speech comes with consequences.

Getting criticized, protested, or even losing sponsors and customers are legitimate consequences of free speech. Getting murdered isn’t. Talking like it is comes really close to justifying political violence.

 

[TOP]

I'd volunteer, but nobody wants to hear an old fat man speak at a university. They have to do that too often in class.

I don't know about that..
you might be a breath of fresh air compared to what some of these profs are now these days...We had profs who were old and cranky... And often eccentric... But in a good way.... They've all retired and been replaced Mostly by individuals Who just wanted to be in college forever....
But didn't really want to or know how to teach..... We didn't know how good we had it....

 

[Yakuda]

I wonder what Charlie Kirk’s thinks about reasonable gun controls now?

I suspect he's still opposed to them because you retarded donkey fuckers never propose anything "reasonable". That's just a catch phrase you cum swallowing assholes like to use. Beyond that the rifle you meatheads used to murder Charlie with isn't an "assault rifle". In fact it's one you cock mouths say is ok for people to own. Stfu

 

[anonymoose]

I honestly don’t know about their gun controls.

I do. Lived there for 3 years and visit the family at least once a year.
The Left is constantly harping about the need for 'gun control' in the U.S. , how much more civilized it is in European countries, and I can tell you it's not that hard to get plenty of guns there. It's just not constitutionalized.

 

[Uncensored2008]

What party? I don’t belong to any political party.

Whether you do or not - you 100% support the democrats and their message of hate.

Assassinating Charlie Kirk was a massive miscalculation by the party. It is only now beginning to dawn on the rank and file that this is the level of the MLK assassination. You have roused a sleeping giant.

 

[anonymoose]

Oh give me a break. How many fucking children have died in mass shootings that were preventable and this prick says it’s worth it to preserve his extremist 2A views?

And I disagree w/ that.

I’m not being remotely as insensitive as Kirk was, for example, toward the families of Sandy Hook victims.

Yet you use that as an excuse to be insensitive yourself.
I'm not nearly as violent as blacks killing ea. other in their ghettos so it's ok if I just randomly beat the shit out of ghetto blacks. See how that works?

I wasn’t seeking laughs either. It is ironic that he died while defending his opposition to reasonable gun control.

Agreed. It's ironic.

Something that if reasonable controls were in place he’d probably still be alive to debate them.

Oh really? He had a criminal record and/or mental health issues that would have prevented him from getting a hunting rifle?

I’ve also have clearly stated that I clearly denounce this sort of violence and the culprit when found should have a fair trial and a hanging.

So I’m not crying crocodile tears for a person who advocated appalling extremist policies. Kirk was clearly a bigot of the worst order but even he did not deserve to be assassinated for his speech and political beliefs.

So try coming out from under your rock and see the world objectively for what is really happening in this country and tell me why I should be sympathetic towards an extremist who himself advocated violence?

Explain to me how a dead person "thinks" about anything.
Nope, you showed your true colors here.
If you were a "journalist" w/ MSNBC you'd be fired for that remark.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Hmm, he really didn't seem to mind very much when other people died from gun violence.

What gun control measure would have stopped the ANTIFA Brown Shirt from Assassinating Kirk?

• The gun was acquired illegally - so no waiting period would work
• No background check was done by ANTIFA prior to supplying the rifle
• It is a bolt action, outlawing semi-automatics would have no impact
• It is a Mauser .30-06 with a 3 round capacity, limiting magazine size means nothing

So what would the Communist party propose?

 

[anonymoose]

Something that if reasonable controls were in place he’d probably still be alive to debate them.

What gun control measure would have stopped the ANTIFA Brown Shirt from Assassinating Kirk?

• The gun was acquired illegally - so no waiting period would work
• No background check was done by ANTIFA prior to supplying the rifle
• It is a bolt action, outlawing semi-automatics would have no impact
• It is a Mauser .30-06 with a 3 round capacity, limiting magazine size means nothing

So what would the Communist party propose?

Well Mott. What reasonable controls?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

I wonder what Charlie Kirk’s thinks about reasonable gun controls now?

Never speak ill of the recently deceased. There's plenty of time to do that later.

 

[EdwinA]

Your party murdered him for speaking out against them. He can no longer think.

What we need is reasonable democrat control. Guns don't kill people - democrats do.

They've been radicalizing their base for years, not any different than radical Muslim mosques work their 'magic' on new converts.

 

[anonymoose]

What gun control measure would have stopped the ANTIFA Brown Shirt from Assassinating Kirk?

• The gun was acquired illegally - so no waiting period would work

It was legally owned. Background check done. No prior criminal history, No mental problems other than being a liberal.

 

[EdwinA]

No mental problems other than being a liberal.

A red flag right there, when these fanatic gun control freaks run out and buy guns; definitely a warning sign.

 

[anonymoose]

What party? I don’t belong to any political party.

Your political leanings are obvious.

 

[volsrocks]

I wonder what Charlie Kirk’s thinks about reasonable gun controls now?

He would ask....What gun control would have stopped this?

So fuck face what gun control would have stopped this?

 

[FastLane]

I wonder what Charlie Kirk’s thinks about reasonable gun controls now?

Venezuela has gun control.

So which reasonable gun control laws would have prevented this assassination with a hunting rifle