Why Are Trump Supporters Anti-Science.

Answer the questions. I will do it for you, if you ask even quasi-reasonable ones.

I think of the ones I posted it's the Left's position on nuclear power. Feel free to rebut why we shouldn't push nuclear power rather than wind and solar that I regularly demonstrate as useless energy sources on a large scale.

So you came up with one. I'm amazed. Here is your answer. Nuclear power is a joke. Because it is dangerous. It can produce radioactive byproducts that will remain dangerous for longer than humans have existed. And things may not go wrong with them often. But when they do there isn't enough money in the world to clean up the mess. The two main examples are Chernobyl and Fukushima.

Solar power is the way to go. And solar panels are getting more efficient all the time. I will show you a picture of the U.S. The area shown in yellow is the area of solar panels it will take to power the U.S. Both day and night. I will show you another picture of the U.S. It shows the total area of the U.S. in green that it would take to power the WORLD! And they last 30 to 40 years.

Solar to power the U.S..png

solar panels to power the world 2.jpg
 
Congratulations, you have some brains! How did you break free from the cult.
I have lived my entire life outside of the herd. ........at the age of four or five my mom looked down at me with a face of disapproval saying "Stevie, you just have to march to your own drummer dont ya...."

Ya.
 
So you came up with one. I'm amazed. Here is your answer. Nuclear power is a joke. Because it is dangerous. It can produce radioactive byproducts that will remain dangerous for longer than humans have existed. And things may not go wrong with them often. But when they do there isn't enough money in the world to clean up the mess. The two main examples are Chernobyl and Fukushima.

Okay, so you know nothing about nuclear power beyond the usual environmentalist-Leftist rhetoric and propaganda.

Let's start with "radioactive byproducts." Virtually everything produced as a byproduct of nuclear fission is an alpha or beta emitter. Those are only a danger if you eat or breath them. Stored in long-term stable containers, the only thing you need is a water-cooling jacket on the container, and not that much of one, to deal with the residual energy produced from decay of the fission fragments. The danger is minimal and less than many other industrial hazards.

Fukushima was the result of an unprecedented natural disaster. Even so, it is being cleaned up as I write this. No problem there, just another industrial hazardous material clean-up.

Chernobyl was the result of a thoroughly corrupt and unaccountable government building an unsafe reactor design, operating it in an unsafe manner, in a facility that was unsafe because of the aforementioned corruption. Chernobyl used a graphite moderated, fast fission, reactor design used NOWHERE else in the world commercially because it was known to be unsafe.

The Soviet Union used it because it was cheap to build, and you got a twofer from it in that it produced weapons grade plutonium as a byproduct of operation. The contractors building the plant short sheeted the materials and work on everything they could to maximize their profit on the black market in the USSR. They paid off the government inspectors to let that happen.

That's what happens when you have unaccountable government agencies running things. The EPA in the US with the Gold King mine in Colorado is the exact same thing only with a different part of industry.

So, Chernobyl is a pathetically, unrealistic, and shitty example of nuclear power usage for commercial purposes. It has ZERO relevance to usage in countries using PWR and BWR systems (Fukushima was a BWR system).

As for "when they do there isn't enough money in the world to clean up the mess," this is simply illiterate bullshit on your part. The worst-case scenario for a nuclear accident in the US commercial power industry was Three Mile Island (TMI). They did everything wrong there. Yet, nobody died as result. Nobody even got cancer. It has been completely cleaned up at a cost of just shy of $1 billion taking 12 years to complete.

Compare that to the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. That cost $8.8 billion, with 12 deaths, and numerous people getting exposure to various chemicals that potentially would cause health issues or cancer. It is actually ongoing since 2010.

I would suggest you stop commenting on nuclear power as you don't know shit about it.
Solar power is the way to go. And solar panels are getting more efficient all the time. I will show you a picture of the U.S. The area shown in yellow is the area of solar panels it will take to power the U.S. Both day and night. I will show you another picture of the U.S. It shows the total area of the U.S. in green that it would take to power the WORLD! And they last 30 to 40 years.
No, it isn't. It will never get more efficient than the watt density of sunlight. It will never produce power when the sun isn't shining on it. Your pictures are irrelevant. IRRELEVANT!

Here's the reality you and solar proponents missed.

You need to produce 100 kw of power for 24 hours everyday. In order to do this, you need:

100 kw of solar panels to produce power when the sun is shining.
Additional panels to make up for that period early and late in the day when they are less than fully efficient.
Additional panels to produce 100 kw worth of power for periods of darkness or poor weather.
A storage system to hold the power produced for when the solar panels aren't working.
Some means to dump excess generation when demand is less than production and the storage system is full.

Short version: You need 5 kw of installed solar panels to reliably produce 1 kw of power for 24 hours. You need a minimum of 16 hours of installed storage capacity in addition to that.

What invariably happens is the cost of all that runs, for your scenario of 100% solar power powering everything into the tens of trillions of dollars. Then you tack on tens of trillions more for a "smart grid." In the end, either electricity becomes unaffordable or the nation goes bankrupt trying to use solar.
 
Trump is anti-science. So if you support Trump, you are anti-science too. Take a look at the brain damaged idiot he appointed to be the head of the Department of Health and Human Services. RFK Jr. He has fired all types of scientists and doctors. Who in the hell is he to do that. Also he told a congressional committee that he was the last person anybody should be taking medical advice from. And yet he thinks he is more intelligent than all the doctors and scientists he's fired? Which more than likely he only did because komrad Trump told him to. Here is a video showing what RFK Jr said.

View: https://vimeo.com/1113406404



Now, I'll show you a video of what an actual Doctor had to say.

View: https://vimeo.com/1113409303
Republicans, now trumptards fear education because educated people are harder to control. And that's pretty much it!
 
I fear the sort of education many people today in the West are getting because it makes them crazy and stupid.
If that's the way White Christian Nationalists truly feel, they can start a university of their own. Wait! What about Liberty University?


"Liberty University will pay its former president, Jerry Falwell Jr., about $15 million to settle litigation following his resignation in 2020 after a high-profile sex scandal that drew national attention to the private Christian institution."
LOL! Turns out Fallwell Jr. like to sit in the corner and jack it while his wife got it on with the young pool boy!

Anyway - my point was - either way you're going to run into opinions from school officials. It's up to you - the student to figure out what's right and wrong. As a product of a state university system, I am grateful I had the privilege!
 

Camus
https://x.com/newstart_2024
@newstart_2024


True science thrives on verification, not just consensus. But a major loophole is undermining trust:Peer reviewers often never see the raw data.This is especially true for vaccine studies. We’re told to “trust the science,” but the critical data needed to verify that science is locked away.Take the Danish study on vaccine safety. Its conclusions are touted, but its de-identified data is hidden. Independent experts can’t check the work.Even worse? The CDC’s premier database, the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), was moved to a private group to shield it from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.Now, access is controlled. Studies must pass a CDC "clearing process," creating obvious selection bias. Only "policy-friendly" results get published.This isn't science. It's gatekeeping.You can't reproduce results.You can't challenge conclusions.You can only trust.Demanding data isn't denialism. It's the foundation of scientific integrity.
 
Okay, so you know nothing about nuclear power beyond the usual environmentalist-Leftist rhetoric and propaganda.

Let's start with "radioactive byproducts." Virtually everything produced as a byproduct of nuclear fission is an alpha or beta emitter. Those are only a danger if you eat or breath them. Stored in long-term stable containers, the only thing you need is a water-cooling jacket on the container, and not that much of one, to deal with the residual energy produced from decay of the fission fragments. The danger is minimal and less than many other industrial hazards.

Fukushima was the result of an unprecedented natural disaster. Even so, it is being cleaned up as I write this. No problem there, just another industrial hazardous material clean-up.

Chernobyl was the result of a thoroughly corrupt and unaccountable government building an unsafe reactor design, operating it in an unsafe manner, in a facility that was unsafe because of the aforementioned corruption. Chernobyl used a graphite moderated, fast fission, reactor design used NOWHERE else in the world commercially because it was known to be unsafe.

The Soviet Union used it because it was cheap to build, and you got a twofer from it in that it produced weapons grade plutonium as a byproduct of operation. The contractors building the plant short sheeted the materials and work on everything they could to maximize their profit on the black market in the USSR. They paid off the government inspectors to let that happen.

That's what happens when you have unaccountable government agencies running things. The EPA in the US with the Gold King mine in Colorado is the exact same thing only with a different part of industry.

So, Chernobyl is a pathetically, unrealistic, and shitty example of nuclear power usage for commercial purposes. It has ZERO relevance to usage in countries using PWR and BWR systems (Fukushima was a BWR system).

As for "when they do there isn't enough money in the world to clean up the mess," this is simply illiterate bullshit on your part. The worst-case scenario for a nuclear accident in the US commercial power industry was Three Mile Island (TMI). They did everything wrong there. Yet, nobody died as result. Nobody even got cancer. It has been completely cleaned up at a cost of just shy of $1 billion taking 12 years to complete.

Compare that to the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. That cost $8.8 billion, with 12 deaths, and numerous people getting exposure to various chemicals that potentially would cause health issues or cancer. It is actually ongoing since 2010.

I would suggest you stop commenting on nuclear power as you don't know shit about it.

No, it isn't. It will never get more efficient than the watt density of sunlight. It will never produce power when the sun isn't shining on it. Your pictures are irrelevant. IRRELEVANT!

Here's the reality you and solar proponents missed.

You need to produce 100 kw of power for 24 hours everyday. In order to do this, you need:

100 kw of solar panels to produce power when the sun is shining.
Additional panels to make up for that period early and late in the day when they are less than fully efficient.
Additional panels to produce 100 kw worth of power for periods of darkness or poor weather.
A storage system to hold the power produced for when the solar panels aren't working.
Some means to dump excess generation when demand is less than production and the storage system is full.

Short version: You need 5 kw of installed solar panels to reliably produce 1 kw of power for 24 hours. You need a minimum of 16 hours of installed storage capacity in addition to that.

What invariably happens is the cost of all that runs, for your scenario of 100% solar power powering everything into the tens of trillions of dollars. Then you tack on tens of trillions more for a "smart grid." In the end, either electricity becomes unaffordable or the nation goes bankrupt trying to use solar.

If only you had a brain. They are trying to clean up the mess at Fukushima. But it is hugely expensive. They estimate it may take 30 to 40 years. Though that timeline is subject to criticism. Apart from removing radioactive soil, (which can never be fully done) there is the 880 tons of highly radioactive material inside the reactors to deal with. It is so radioactive that it is difficult for even a robot to do. Etc. etc. etc etc. All in all, whatever it was that they gained from using nuclear power, it would have been FAR cheaper for them to have used some other energy source. As for solar panels, they work just fine. The only problem with them is that is difficult to charge people for energy that is FREE.
 
Trump is anti-science. So if you support Trump, you are anti-science too. Take a look at the brain damaged idiot he appointed to be the head of the Department of Health and Human Services. RFK Jr. He has fired all types of scientists and doctors. Who in the hell is he to do that. Also he told a congressional committee that he was the last person anybody should be taking medical advice from. And yet he thinks he is more intelligent than all the doctors and scientists he's fired? Which more than likely he only did because komrad Trump told him to. Here is a video showing what RFK Jr said.

View: https://vimeo.com/1113406404



Now, I'll show you a video of what an actual Doctor had to say.

View: https://vimeo.com/1113409303
Whack-jobs gonna whack, and RFK is one of the biggest.
 
Republicans, now trumptards fear education because educated people are harder to control. And that's pretty much it!

I agree. And in one of his speeches, Trump said, "I love the poorly educated!" Trump has also said that smart people don't like him. In that, he is calling those who support him stupid. And they are stupid. Apparently too stupid to know when they are being insulted. Also, Trump held a rally in Las Vegas where it was 103 degrees Fahrenheit outside. For the people having to put up with the heat, he said, "I don't care about you. I just want your vote."
 
Anti-science? Let's see, do YOU:

Believe that solar and wind generation can produce the energy we need at a lower cost than alternatives?
yes

Believe that using nuclear power is a bad thing and dangerous?
no
That the only purpose oil and coal have is produce energy?
don't be stupid
That solar and wind do not contribute to climate change?
they do not.
That it is possible to modify your gender without changing your genetics?
that's up to the individual, not you or me
How about that all vaccines are highly effective and have few side effects?
that's true
That GMO's are uniformly dangerous?
of course not
That wood burning pellet stoves are carbon neutral?
not even close
That humanity as a people should strive to eliminate all pollution?
And that isn't even remotely possible.
 
Whack-jobs gonna whack, and RFK is one of the biggest.
The silver lining is that mostly it will be low IQ and/or ignorant MAGAts who die due to Trump's HHS. The net effect will reduce the Idiocracy.

Idiocracy.jpg
 
Answer the questions. I will do it for you, if you ask even quasi-reasonable ones.

I think of the ones I posted it's the Left's position on nuclear power. Feel free to rebut why we shouldn't push nuclear power rather than wind and solar that I regularly demonstrate as useless energy sources on a large scale.
But they aren't. We should eb using all of them.
 
Yeah. If only they were smart enough to know how stupid they are.
MAGAts are so stupid they now believe that a comedian telling a joke is a lie, but whatever shit is spilling out of Trump's mouth daily is either the truth of "Trump being Trump".

The MAGA morons think this joke is a "lie":

How many Trump supporters does it take to change a lightbulb?​

None. Trump says it’s changed and his supporters all cheer in the dark.
 

Camus
https://x.com/newstart_2024
@newstart_2024


True science thrives on verification, not just consensus. But a major loophole is undermining trust:Peer reviewers often never see the raw data.This is especially true for vaccine studies. We’re told to “trust the science,” but the critical data needed to verify that science is locked away.Take the Danish study on vaccine safety. Its conclusions are touted, but its de-identified data is hidden. Independent experts can’t check the work.Even worse? The CDC’s premier database, the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), was moved to a private group to shield it from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.Now, access is controlled. Studies must pass a CDC "clearing process," creating obvious selection bias. Only "policy-friendly" results get published.This isn't science. It's gatekeeping.You can't reproduce results.You can't challenge conclusions.You can only trust.Demanding data isn't denialism. It's the foundation of scientific integrity.

That's not how science works. Everything is peer reviewed. At least eventually. The whole point of science is to not hide the data. So I am highly skeptical that what you say is true. Especially when it comes to something as important as vaccines.
 
That's not how science works. Everything is peer reviewed. At least eventually. The whole point of science is to not hide the data. So I am highly skeptical that what you say is true. Especially when it comes to something as important as vaccines.
MAGAts ain't too bright.

This explains why:

Who's a Trump fan?​

A teacher asked his class how many of them were Trump fans.
Not quite knowing what a Trump fan is, but wanting to be loved by the teacher, all of the kids raised their hands, except Little Johnny.

The teacher asked Little Johnny why did you decide to be different... again.

Little Johnny said, “Because I'm not a Trump fan."

“Why aren't you a Trump fan?"

Johnny said, “Because I'm a Democrat."

The teacher asked him why he is a Democrat.

Little Johnny replied, “Well my mom is a Democrat and my dad is a Democrat, so I'm a Democrat."

The teacher, annoyed by this answer, asked him, "If your mother was an idiot and your father a jerk, what would that make you?"

Little Johnny replied, “A Trump fan."
 
That's not how science works. Everything is peer reviewed. At least eventually. The whole point of science is to not hide the data. So I am highly skeptical that what you say is true. Especially when it comes to something as important as vaccines.
Peer review has been a failure, and the data when not fraudulent is being hidden.
 
Back
Top