Abortion

[Into the Night]

Why do you pretend I haven't answered your questions?

Because you haven't. You continue to evade.

 

[AProudLefty]

Because you haven't. You continue to evade.

@IBDaMann was asked, not you.

 

[IBDaMann]

Heartbeat ≠ consciousness or sentience.

Did you just learn this?

 

[Into the Night]

A few points here:
1- Do you believe that women who freeze their embryos and then decide to discard them are "murdering" their children?

Yes.

2- All human cells, including sperm and egg cells, have at least one complete set of DNA from both of their parents.

WRONG!
Neither a sperm nor egg cell has a complete DNA set.

Your evasions and word games won't work. Abortion is murder.

The only difference between regular cells and sperm and egg cells is that regular cells have -2- sets of DNA from their parents, whereas sperm and egg cells only have 1.

WRONG. Neither sperm nor egg have a complete set of DNA.

I'm pretty sure the reason they only have one is so that they can pair up with their counterpart (if sperm, that'd be egg, if egg, that'd be sperm) to again form 2 sets of DNA- at that point, the fertilized egg also has 2 sets of parents, it's just that those parents are different parents then the parents of the sperm and egg cells before joining.

WRONG. A fertilized egg has ONE complete set of DNA. It is NOT identical to either parent.

3- There is no growth if the fertilized eggs if they don't remain in a fertile female's body.

At which point the human dies.

If the mother induced it to die, that is murder.

 

[Into the Night]

Both human sperm and human eggs -can- become people who are born if they are joined together in a fertile human female body. Conversely, fertilized eggs will not progress in development if they are not in a fertile female's body. The most important point is being in the fertile female body.



I think it's natural that people are incredibly speciest- I'm sure I am to some extent myself. But I think there should be limits. It's one thing to value the life of any born human above that of any animal, but when it comes to 'living humans' that aren't yet born, I draw the line, especially if the female within whom said unborn human resides no longer wishes to have said unborn human within her.

Your word games won't work. Abortion is murder.

 

[AProudLefty]

Did you just learn this?

You made the claim.

 

[Into the Night]

@Into the Night never answers questions. He just mindlessly chants RQAA.

Lie.

You on the other hand pretends that I don't answer your questions.

Because you don't.

When you copy each other, even have the same language and website, it begs the question.

Random pivot. No apparent coherency.

 

[IBDaMann]

@Into the Night never answers questions. He just mindlessly chants RQAA.

Into the Night's official policy is to not answer any question more than six times.

Having said that, I know of two questions that he mistakenly answered eight times each, i.e. he was caught asleep at the wheel.

You on the other hand pretends that I don't answer your questions.

Nope. No pretending is needed.

When you copy each other, even have the same language and website, it begs the question.

What question is begged?

 

[Into the Night]

You never answer questions.

Lie. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

You made the claim.

Irrelevance fallacy.

 

[IBDaMann]

You made the claim.

What claim? I noticed that you once again didn't answer my question.

 

[Into the Night]

@IBDaMann was asked, not you.

This is not private mail, LeftNut.
Answer the questions put to you.

 

[Into the Night]

What claim? I noticed that you once again didn't answer my question.

Questions. You asked more than one question, and he hasn't answered any of them.

 

[AProudLefty]

What claim? I noticed that you once again didn't answer my question.

It's questions. Plural. I've answered them.

 

[IBDaMann]

The only reason I also use the term 'living human' is because it's such a catch all word.

Nope. You use it because it is very specific. All things that are not alive or that are not human are excluded. That's a lot of things excluded. The term "living human" is by no means any sort of "catch all".

It can mean any [living human].

That's sort of the point for a definition of "living human".

It can also exclude one or more of these stages of human development.

No stage of any living human is excluded by the term "living human".

The -problem- with this compound word is that I have yet to see it in any dictionary, encyclopedia or set of legal definitions.

Big deal. You have now seen it on JPP, which is a website just like any website you just mentioned, i.e. it has an IP address, an API, etc.

You haven't answered any of my questions:

It looks like you are entirely free to answer questions:

1. What abortions are performed without the customer signing the contractual paperwork and waivers?
2. What entities with a heartbeat and human DNA are somehow not living humans?
3. How is {customer who is a pregnant woman} somehow not a proper subset of {customer}?
4. How is the killing of a living human somehow not a killing?
5. Why do you advocate for women to be able to order hits on living humans whereas no one else can, i.e. killing supremacy?
6. Why can doctors be allowed to professional killers of living humans whereas no one else can, i.e. killing supremacy?
7. Why do you advocate for the killing of living humans who have not committed any crime and who have not expressed any desire to die?
8. Why do you advocate for the targets of legalized contract killings by professional killers to get no say in the matter and no day in court with legal representation?
9. Why do you advocate for fathers to not be allowed to save the lives of their children?

 

[IBDaMann]

It's questions. Plural.

Poor grammar. You have to write "They are questions" or "It is 'questions' (plural)".

I've answered them.

You didn't answer my question (singular) and you didn't answer any of my previous questions (plural). You never answer questions.

 

[AProudLefty]

Nope. You use it because it is very specific. All things that are not alive or that are not human are excluded. That's a lot of things excluded. The term "living human" is by no means any sort of "catch all".


That's sort of the point for a definition of "living human".


No stage of any living human is excluded by the term "living human".


Big deal. You have now seen it on JPP, which is a website just like any website you just mentioned, i.e. it has an IP address, an API, etc.

You haven't answered any of my questions:

It looks like you are entirely free to answer questions:

1. What abortions are performed without the customer signing the contractual paperwork and waivers?
2. What entities with a heartbeat and human DNA are somehow not living humans?
3. How is {customer who is a pregnant woman} somehow not a proper subset of {customer}?
4. How is the killing of a living human somehow not a killing?
5. Why do you advocate for women to be able to order hits on living humans whereas no one else can, i.e. killing supremacy?
6. Why can doctors be allowed to professional killers of living humans whereas no one else can, i.e. killing supremacy?
7. Why do you advocate for the killing of living humans who have not committed any crime and who have not expressed any desire to die?
8. Why do you advocate for the targets of legalized contract killings by professional killers to get no say in the matter and no day in court with legal representation?
9. Why do you advocate for fathers to not be allowed to save the lives of their children?

RQAA

 

[AProudLefty]

Poor grammar. You have to write "They are questions" or "It is 'questions' (plural)".

Your bad English is noted. Lack of understanding too. It is more than one question. And I have answered them.

You didn't answer my question (singular) and you didn't answer any of my previous questions (plural). You never answer questions.

Your denial is noted.

I have answered your questions.

 

[AProudLefty]

@gfm7175 @IBDaMann @Into the Night

 

[IBDaMann]

Questions. You asked more than one question, and he hasn't answered any of them.

Nope. In the post in question, I asked him "Did you just learn this?" which was my entire post. He didn't answer my question; he just EVADED like @Scott. I simply mentioned to AProudLefty that he didn't answer my question.

i.e.

Did you just learn this?