Yakuda
Verified User
A different sex at birth? What are the available options?Woman - an adult who lives and identifies as female though they may have been considered to have a different sex at birth
A different sex at birth? What are the available options?Woman - an adult who lives and identifies as female though they may have been considered to have a different sex at birth
So.now male refers to biological sex? Before you said man. Which it is?Male?
This is Buck Angel. He identifies as a man/male.
If you have met people like him, you would have called him a he or a man.
View attachment 62240
Be honest. You would have called him a he or a man.So.now male refers to biological sex? Before you said man. Which it is?
Yes and that's not relevant. It's possible to misidentify lots of things. That doesn't change what that thing is. Thats either a male or a female. What it identifies as and what I identify it as doesn't change what it is.Be honest. You would have called him a he or a man.
Of course the biological sexes don't change.Yes and that's not relevant. It's possible to misidentify lots of things. That doesn't change what that thing is. Thats either a male or a female. What it identifies as and what I identify it as doesn't change what it is.
Great then an male can never be female but can be a woman and a female can never be a male but can be a man.Of course the biological sexes don't change.
They see themselves as the opposite genders.Great then an male can never be female but can be a woman and a female can never be a male but can be a man.
I don't give a fuck.They see themselves as the opposite genders.
Their brains see/identify themselves and their bodies as the opposite sexes/genders.I don't give a fuck.
A male can never be a female but can be a woman and a female can never be a male but can be a man. Is that accurate or not dumbass?
Again how many times do you need to hear I don't give a fuck. How they "see and identify themselves and their bodies" doesn't change what is. So againTheir brains see/identify themselves and their bodies as the opposite sexes/genders.
but none of those DEFINE what a man is.Computers can only output what programers input into them. So AI isn't always correct. Men have larger hearts and larger lungs and stronger more dense bones on average.
lie.Their brains see/identify themselves and their bodies as the opposite sexes/genders.
RQAADo you have an actual answer to the question?
And it is STILL meaningless to what they are.And yet they exist and is observable.
Fallacy fallacy.Straw man.
Right.Again how many times do you need to hear I don't give a fuck. How they "see and identify themselves and their bodies" doesn't change what is.
A biologically male can never be a biologically female. That's a given.So again
A male can never be a female but can be a woman and a female can never be a male but can be a man. Is that accurate or not?!
Calling those children meaningless?And it is STILL meaningless to what they are.
The adverb biologically makes no sense there. Do you mean a biologically male human can never be a biologically female human? I agree that's not the problem. The problem is can a biologically male human be a woman? Yes of no?Right.
A biologically male can never be a biologically female. That's a given.
Most likely it would if discouraged enough.If it's pretending, as you claim, it would be temporary or a fad. It would go away.
They have.Most likely it would if discouraged enough.