Scott
Verified User
Saw most of the video, quite good.
Kirk assassination evidence
- Thread starter goat
- Start date
Saw most of the video, quite good.
I appreciate how you stick to this internet backwater.
Scott
Verified User
Sometimes the backwaters are the best places. Honestly, if I knew a better place to discuss things, I would be there
.This is a nasty dark age.Sometimes the backwaters are the best places. Honestly, if I knew a better place to discuss things, I would be there
I hear U Brother.
Here is Jimmy Dore explaining the Google searches on Tyler Robinson and the Utah medical examiner originating from Washington DC and israel 50 days before Kirk was assassinated. It's 30 minutes but pretty much proves a government conspiracy.
Also tracking claims of a CIA plane in the area being the cause of manipulated cell phone recordings.
The FBI is limited to federal crimes yet they jumped all over the Charlie Kirk case and shoved local and state police out of the way as if they had something to hide. Candace Owens said Trump is supervising the cover up.
Michael McCoy was Charlie Kirk's chief of staff and is on video talking on his phone then turning and walking away the instant Charlie is shot. Is that what you would do if your BFF was assassinated on live TV?
John Curtis, US senator from Utah, appointed Tyler Robinson an attorney (I need to verify this) because Tyler is not allowed to speak to or see anyone. There's a long list of the best attorneys in the US willing to represent Tyler for free so why are they being denied access to Tyler?
The FBI has the entire case stitched up for Tyler to take the fall. Is this what yall call justice?
Michael McCoy was Charlie Kirk's chief of staff and is on video talking on his phone then turning and walking away the instant Charlie is shot. Is that what you would do if your BFF was assassinated on live TV?
John Curtis, US senator from Utah, appointed Tyler Robinson an attorney (I need to verify this) because Tyler is not allowed to speak to or see anyone. There's a long list of the best attorneys in the US willing to represent Tyler for free so why are they being denied access to Tyler?
The FBI has the entire case stitched up for Tyler to take the fall. Is this what yall call justice?
Scott
Verified User
I think Hawkeye's posts regarding this case are quite good, but I haven't seen any evidence that Tyler was denied the ability to bring in his own lawyers. I did hear that initially, he was appointed one because he wasn't able to afford one himself, but it looks like some have decided to work for him pro bono now:
Charlie Kirk assassination suspect's expanded defense team includes Menendez brother's former attorney
Tyler Robinson, accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University, adds experienced California defense attorneys Michael Burt and Richard Novak to his legal team.
www.foxnews.com
I have 3 different sources saying no one is allowed to speak to or see Tyler. My info may be 2 or 3 days old but it took me a decade to trust these sources. Legacy media is part of the cover up.I think Hawkeye's posts regarding this case are quite good, but I haven't seen any evidence that Tyler was denied the ability to bring in his own lawyers. I did hear that initially, he was appointed one because he wasn't able to afford one himself, but it looks like some have decided to work for him pro bono now:
Charlie Kirk assassination suspect's expanded defense team includes Menendez brother's former attorney
Tyler Robinson, accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University, adds experienced California defense attorneys Michael Burt and Richard Novak to his legal team.
The point to my update is this is not a federal case so how and why is the FBI involved? And what about Charlie's chief of staff turning and walking away from the scene?
When a person is assassinated, the shooter's life is all over the news. They meticulously pick them apart. You know everything. Kirk's shooter is fading from memories already. Do you remember Oswald, Jack Ruby, Sirhan Sirhan, Mark David Chapman, J.W. Booth? Who remembers Kirk's assassin? Only a deep state far righty.
Have you ever shot a 30-06?
Scott
Verified User
Alright, but why don't you link to your sources then?
That's another issue, which I think Hawkeye may have already covered in one of his videos.
I can provide a link proving the geocentric model but what good would it do. I try to remember key points to videos I watch and summarize them. It's up to you to do your own research. Posting links to Fox News is not a good way to get to the truth.
Scott
Verified User
If only that were true. Plenty of evidence that past American assassinations have been covered quite badly. JFK's assassination and 9/11 come to mind. Fortunately, there are some that keep on digging. At this point, most Americans have disbelieved that Oswald was the "lone gunman" for decades now:
Decades Later, Most Americans Doubt Lone Gunman Killed JFK
On the 60th anniversary of President Kennedy's assassination, about two-thirds of Americans think there was more than one person involved in the murder, but there is little consensus about who that was.
news.gallup.com
As to 9/11, those who doubt the official story isn't quite as high, but according to a 2006 poll, a majority of Americans -did- want a congressional investigation on what happened:
**
Zogby Poll: 51% of Americans Want Congress to Probe Bush/Cheney Regarding 9/11 Attacks; Over 30% Seek Immediate Impeachment
67% also fault 9/11 Commission for not investigating anomalous collapse of World Trade Center 7
Kansas City, MO (Zogby International) September 6, 2007 - As America nears the sixth anniversary of the world-churning events of September 11, 2001, a new Zogby International poll finds a majority of Americans still await a Congressional investigation of President Bush' and Vice President Cheney's actions before, during and after the 9/11 attacks. Over 30% also believe Bush and/or Cheney should be immediately impeached by the House of Representatives.
The 911truth.org–sponsored poll also found that over two-thirds of Americans say the 9/11 Commission should have investigated the still unexplained collapse of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 at 5:20 p.m. on September 11, 2001.
WTC 7 housed the mayor's emergency bunker and offices of the SEC, IRS, CIA and Secret Service and was not hit by any planes but still completely collapsed into its own footprint nearly eight hours after the Twin Tower attacks. FEMA did not explain this collapse, the 911 Commission ignored it, and the promised official study by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is now 2 years overdue.
Janice Matthews, executive director of poll sponsor 911truth.org, observes: "The supermajority response to the WTC Building 7 question signals an increasing public concern about this remarkable event -- up from 38% last year. We can perhaps credit this rising awareness to the millions who have recently witnessed videos or Youtube clips of this skyscraper's descent and the outspoken demands for a new WTC inquiry from over 150 architects and engineering professionals, including NIST's own former Fire Science Division Chief, Dr. James Quintiere. Another contributory factor is the increased questioning among Hispanics, Blacks and Asians whose responses appear significantly more critical of the 9/11 Commission than Whites, sometimes twice as critical."
Strategy aide W. David Kubiak adds, "While only 32% seek immediate Bush and/or Cheney impeachment based on their current personal knowledge, a clear majority of citizens still seems hungry for a full exposure of the facts. The results suggest widespread public support for legislators like Rep. Dennis Kucinich who pledge to investigate unanswered 9/11 questions in the relevant congressional committees this fall. We hope more of our representatives find the spine to respond to this escalating dissatisfaction with the dubious accounting we have received thus far."
**
Source:
Scott
Verified User
You may have noticed that I frequently post links to my sources. The reason for me it simple- anyone can make whatever claim they like. What's much harder is backing up one's claims.
My claim is the FBI is covering up for a state sponsored assassination.
Scott
Verified User
I think there's plenty of evidence to support that claim. I just haven't seen any evidence that Tyler wasn't allowed to choose his own lawyers.
I knew 911 was state sponsored terrorism the instant it happened but it took me almost 10 years to compile evidence to prove it. My Charlie Kirk compilation is just getting started and Hawkeye isn't helping by posting evidence on another thread. This is a team effort.
Life is Golden
It's Morning in America Again
Yep.