Refugee Rhetoric!

Silence from the Maga/Alt-Right peanut gallery.

They seem to go REAL quiet when I start posting realities. They can't BS around them without looking foolish.
More likely people read that gibberish of an OP and could not make heads or tails of what the fuck you said because you can't type out a coherent English sentence. But I suppose that's to be expected from a low IQ nigger.
 
Trump's administration has focused on white South Africans by prioritizing them in a reduced U.S. refugee cap, claiming they face discrimination and violence in their home country. This policy has drawn strong criticism from the South African government, which denies the claims of "white genocide" or a campaign of persecution. The administration has implemented a yearly limit of 7,500 refugees, with most spots reserved for white South Africans, specifically the Afrikaner minority


Oct 30, 2025

Trump administration limits refugee admissions to mostly white South Africans​

 
More likely people read that gibberish of an OP and could not make heads or tails of what the fuck you said because you can't type out a coherent English sentence. But I suppose that's to be expected from a low IQ nigger.
Get someone with a high school G.E.D to explain it to you. Thanks for representing the sheet wearing crowd.
 
Has anyone heard anything recently about those Afrikaan refugees fleeing "persecution" n South Africa that Cheeto Jeezus gave card blanc asylum to on national TV?


While it's not a "genocide," crime in S. Africa has reached epidemic proportions as the structure of government and stability in the country is vanishing. Farm attacks on Whites is more about opportunity for criminals (mostly or entirely Black) seeking to rob what they see as wealthy targets that are easy.

On the other hand, the decline into chaos that is S. Africa is undeniable.





Under majority Black rule S. Africa has gone from an emerging Western-style nation that is globally competitive to a Third World disaster. That is undeniable.

That gives Whites living there likely as much valid reason to seek asylum in the US as it does for Hispanics from any nation in Central or South America.
 


While it's not a "genocide," crime in S. Africa has reached epidemic proportions as the structure of government and stability in the country is vanishing. Farm attacks on Whites is more about opportunity for criminals (mostly or entirely Black) seeking to rob what they see as wealthy targets that are easy.

On the other hand, the decline into chaos that is S. Africa is undeniable.





Under majority Black rule S. Africa has gone from an emerging Western-style nation that is globally competitive to a Third World disaster. That is undeniable.

That gives Whites living there likely as much valid reason to seek asylum in the US as it does for Hispanics from any nation in Central or South America.

https://www.reuters.com/markets/cur...cial-double-standard-south-africa-2025-02-03/
 
Last edited:

https://www.reuters.com/markets/cur...cial-double-standard-south-africa-2025-02-03/
I already stated that the "White genocide" in S. Africa is a myth. What isn't a myth is that violent crime has astronomically skyrocketed in S. Africa and the nation in general is no longer safe. The economic decline of S. Africa is also not up for debate, it is a fact. That someone would want to flee a nation turning into a Turd World shithole (think Venezuela in the Americas) is perfectly reasonable. As a reason for granting asylum in the US it is no more, or less, valid than for some Hispanic fleeing Venezuela as one example.

If the later is being granted asylum, then the White S. African should be equally considered for it as well.
 
In South Africa, where the vast majority of white farmers (about 30,000 commercial operations, predominantly white-owned) reside, farm attacks, including murders, robberies, and assaults, are a documented reality.

From 1990 to 2024, the Transvaal Agricultural Union (TAU SA) tallied 2,229 total farm murders, including 1,363 white farmers,.

These attacks are often brutal, involving torture or home invasions.

Zimbabwe presents a sharper historical example of targeted violence against white farmers, tied directly to state-backed land reform under former President Robert Mugabe. From 2000 to 2008, a fast-track land redistribution program led to the invasion of over 4,000 white-owned farms by "war veterans" and Zimbabwe African National Union – Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF) supporters, resulting in documented murders of white farmers (e.g., Alan Dunn in 2000, bludgeoned to death; Terry Ford in 2002, shot while fleeing an attack), alongside beatings, intimidation, and displacement of thousands.

Reports from Human Rights Watch and the Commercial Farmers Union documented farmer deaths during this period, with tactics including armed occupations, hostage-taking, and property destruction.

Mugabe openly stated that killers of white farmers would not be prosecuted.

White farmers in Africa. especially in South Africa and historically in Zimbabwe, do endure violent attacks.

 
Trump's administration has focused on white South Africans
... because they are being hunted down and killed.

... [proselytizing their plight of] discrimination and violence in their home country.
FTFY.

This policy has drawn strong criticism from the South African government,
... who really doesn't want international attention drawn to their campaign of genocide against "whites".

The administration has implemented a yearly limit of 7,500 refugees, with most spots reserved for white South Africans, specifically the Afrikaner minority [facing genocide].
FTFY.

6431304a38f32bbcc3f961ae54bbe86b.jpg
 
In South Africa, where the vast majority of white farmers (about 30,000 commercial operations, predominantly white-owned) reside, farm attacks, including murders, robberies, and assaults, are a documented reality.

From 1990 to 2024, the Transvaal Agricultural Union (TAU SA) tallied 2,229 total farm murders, including 1,363 white farmers,.

These attacks are often brutal, involving torture or home invasions.
 
I already stated that the "White genocide" in S. Africa is a myth.
... and you were mistaken.

What isn't a myth is that violent crime has astronomically skyrocketed in S. Africa and the nation in general is no longer safe.
... because white land owners are being systematically targetted for extermination, precisely because they won't get off their land.

Whites are facing genocide in South Africa because black South Africans don't want them there.

The economic decline of S. Africa is also not up for debate, it is a fact.
The white farmers that are being exterminated were the source of South Africa's wealth, along with mining.

That someone would want to flee a nation turning into a Turd World shithole (think Venezuela in the Americas) is perfectly reasonable. As a reason for granting asylum in the US it is no more, or less, valid than for some Hispanic fleeing Venezuela as one example.
That is certainly a good reason to leave, but white South Africans are fleeing to avoid execution.

If the later is being granted asylum, then the White S. African should be equally considered for it as well.
The whites facing execution could be given their own category.
 
I already stated that the "White genocide" in S. Africa is a myth. What isn't a myth is that violent crime has astronomically skyrocketed in S. Africa and the nation in general is no longer safe. The economic decline of S. Africa is also not up for debate, it is a fact. That someone would want to flee a nation turning into a Turd World shithole (think Venezuela in the Americas) is perfectly reasonable. As a reason for granting asylum in the US it is no more, or less, valid than for some Hispanic fleeing Venezuela as one example.

If the later is being granted asylum, then the White S. African should be equally considered for it as well.
Essentially, you're trying to salvage your initial assertions and the basis of the "reasoning" for Dump to give a pass to a bunch of disgruntled Afrikaaners who were LYING about the reasons for seeking asylum in America.

Then you just ignore the specifics of the information in the links I provided to regurgitate your generalized assertions. As they say, the devil is in the details. And riddle me this Batman; if South Africa is circling the drain, then why haven't the following jumped ship?
  1. Major corporations like Sasol and Shoprite are predominantly white-owned.
  2. The mining sector, including companies like Anglo American, remains largely white-controlled.
  3. Financial institutions such as Standard Bank and FirstRand have significant white ownership
  4. Many mines are owned or partially owned by foreign companies, particularly from Canada, Australia, and the UK.
  5. De Beers was historically founded and controlled by white owners. As of recent developments, De Beers is part of the Anglo American plc group, which is publicly traded. Current ownership includes a mix of institutional investors, but the legacy of white ownership remains influential.
Basically, you just ignore what you don't like and parrot the SOS in various forms. Case in point (with apologies to the first link of this sort not registering):

US Episcopal Church calls out Trump on double standards​

www.dw.com/en/us-episcopal-church-calls-out-trump-on-double-standards/video-72547098
 
Back
Top