Would you care to present how refering to an illegal immigrant, as an illegal immigrant, is dehumizing??
Am I making a case against the term "illegal immigrant?" Nope.
Would you care to present how refering to an illegal immigrant, as an illegal immigrant, is dehumizing??
You were guaranteed a Republic not a people's republic. The land is not owned collectively and there is no trespass.
Am I making a case against the term "illegal immigrant?" Nope.
20 million paying no taxes for what 2 decades already. Tax those muther fuckers. And most illegals aren't drug smuggles like that old hag slut said.
Youi're the one that brought it up.
If you have no support for your assertions, just say so.
I brought up "illegal trespasser" which is nothing but blatant propaganda and you have failed to support it.
You also brought up illegal immigrants and I did address the iillegal tresapass issue.
Just because you have nothing to support your angst against it, doesn't mean that it wasn't addressed or supported.
Nothing to support my angst? Trespass is a crime against a person or his property. Immigration, illegal or otherwise, is not such a crime. The people of Arizona do not own the land collectively and so there can be no trespass against them collectively.
Really!!
So it is your belief that you can't be held trespassing, except on the private property of a person and that there are no laws, regarding trespassing, on public land.
How are they trespassing? It's propaganda based on collectivist/communist ideas about property rights.
Of course, the government may own pieces of land and act a steward of that land. It does not own all land.
I disagree. What right of self-determination do people in a country have if they have no right to determine who may or may not enter their country to assure their own security?
And as a steward, the Government of AZ is going to enforce trespassing laws for illegal immigrants found in AZ.
The right to self determination does not include the right to deny someone else the right of movement. Our founders certainly did not believe that the right to bar entry was fundamental.
The right to self determination does not include the right to deny someone else the right of movement. Our founders certainly did not believe that the right to bar entry was fundamental.
A uniform rule of naturalization, and necessary and proper laws to enforce it?
Naturalization is how an immigrant becomes a citizen. There were no laws against immigration.
Naturalization is how an immigrant becomes a citizen. There were no laws against immigration.
You are being purposefully obtuse. The government does not own all land and is not entitled to act as steward over all land.