U.S. Supreme Court to hear case determining if states can count mail-in ballots that are received AFTER Election Day

If they can't get them in on time, then that's just tuff shit. Those votes don't count. Period.
Why?

What is the difference between one that arrives today and one that arrives tomorrow, which is the day after voting day?

I do not care that 'you prefer it' one way or the other just as i am sure you do not care what i prefer. The Constitution says States decide, so why do you think that should be over ridden?
 
How would we know that?

You could simply have someone hang on to the ballots and then dispose of them instead. SSDD. Mail in elections are fraught with opportunities to commit fraud.
Except they are not. I understand Trump has convinced stupid people they are but pre Trump and all around the world mail in voting and digital voting is occuring and there is ZERO proof of increased fraud.
 
Except they are not. I understand Trump has convinced stupid people they are but pre Trump and all around the world mail in voting and digital voting is occuring and there is ZERO proof of increased fraud.
And how do you know that? Absence of proof isn't proof of absence.

Most nations, the vast majority, heavily restrict mail-in balloting and few hold all-mail-in ballot elections.


 
And how do you know that? Absence of proof isn't proof of absence.

Most nations, the vast majority, heavily restrict mail-in balloting and few hold all-mail-in ballot elections.


I know it in the same way you know in person voting is free of increased fraud.

Or do you think in person voting is worse?
 
I know it in the same way you know in person voting is free of increased fraud.

Or do you think in person voting is worse?
A person voting in person that has to present ID and be checked against a voter role by someone who is supervised and then votes in a booth by themselves definitely reduces the possibility of fraud.
 
A person voting in person that has to present ID and be checked against a voter role by someone who is supervised and then votes in a booth by themselves definitely reduces the possibility of fraud.
And how do you know that? Absence of proof isn't proof of absence.

I want to see the proof you are using to make that claim, as people cheat on stuff in person all the time.
 
yes it is you simpleton.

If you are a service stationed out of country it is very hard to ensure it comes in before the election unless you fly in with it in your own hands.

No one controls the speed of mail, delivery.

There can be exceptions for the military. No other exceptions.
 
Why?

What is the difference between one that arrives today and one that arrives tomorrow, which is the day after voting day?

I do not care that 'you prefer it' one way or the other just as i am sure you do not care what i prefer. The Constitution says States decide, so why do you think that should be over ridden?
NO stateside ballots should be counted after 8:00 PM election day.
Where have I suggested that should be overridden? Yep, let the states decide.
 
It is an easy concept. If you want your mail-in ballot to count send it in at least 10 days before election day. That way snail mail has enough time to deliver it. Ballots post marked later than that date will not get counted. Mail-in ballots will not get opened before 8:00 pm election day.
 
There can be exceptions for the military. No other exceptions.
Why?

What is about Magats, like you, that you think you alone should be able to dictate to the States and others? What makes magats so delusional and arrogant?

I say that earnestly as i would never think the States need to follow my preference just because i want it that way when THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE between a mail in vote coming in from the military after the election day voting closes and other peoples coming in.
 
NO stateside ballots should be counted after 8:00 PM election day.
Where have I suggested that should be overridden? Yep, let the states decide.
Then States have already decided and they allow them to come in after 8pm election day so you are saying two things at once.

If you agree States get to decide, you cannot limit the States to the time frame you want.

Not sure the poorly educated can understand that though.
 
It is an easy concept. If you want your mail-in ballot to count send it in at least 10 days before election day. That way snail mail has enough time to deliver it. Ballots post marked later than that date will not get counted. Mail-in ballots will not get opened before 8:00 pm election day.
Again why? And 10 days is not a guarantee when it comes to mail.

I get you have an opinion. I do too. The States also have opinions formed in their election governing boards.

Do you think the States should be held to my opinion?

Do you think i should be able to dictate to States?

Or do you say 'no, only us Magats get to dictate'?
 
yes it is you simpleton.

If you are a service stationed out of country it is very hard to ensure it comes in before the election unless you fly in with it in your own hands.

No one controls the speed of mail, delivery.
Send it early, you simpleton.
 
Send it early, you simpleton.
"Early" is no guarantee that mail sent from Uganda or Ukraine or other areas US service men may be at the time, gets to the State early.

A person who is not a simpleton, like you, would understand that and why those service people should not be ignored if it arrives 5 minutes after the polls close.

You have to be stupid to think that vote should not count 5 minutes after but should have counted 5 minutes before.

it is an idiotic and arbitrary rule for no reason as it is the same vote, either way.
 
Then States have already decided and they allow them to come in after 8pm election day so you are saying two things at once.

If you agree States get to decide, you cannot limit the States to the time frame you want.

Not sure the poorly educated can understand that though.

For national elections. All others elections let the states decide.
 
Back
Top