Hegseth issues an illegal order.

[AProudLefty]

RQAA

Ignored.

 

[Into the Night]

What propaganda?

RQAA

 

[Into the Night]

One of those people is on your side.

Lie.

 

[Into the Night]

So investigating the report is the wrong thing?

RQAA

 

[Into the Night]

Ignored.

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

 

[AProudLefty]

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Lie.

RQAA

Ignored.

 

[Into the Night]

All MAGAt cracker retards are cowardly morons. Sad.

You think you're a 'cracker' and a 'retard', Sybil?

 

[AProudLefty]

You think you're a 'cracker' and a 'retard', Sybil?

Ignored.

 

[Into the Night]

My side is the truth.

Lie.

 

[Into the Night]

Ignored.

Ignored.

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

 

[AProudLefty]

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Lie.

Ignored.

 

[Into the Night]

Already answered many, many, many times.

Lie.

Apparently you're senile and cannot remember.

Inversion fallacy.

Do the alleged illegal activities need to be investigated?

What 'illegal activities'?

Yes or no?

I do? Quote me.

See above.

If you have senility, then I am sorry.

YARP

 

[Into the Night]

Assumption of victory fallacy.

Again, are you opposed to investigation?

Yes or no?

If yes, why? You call yourself Truth Detector. Is that a lie?

Fallacy fallacy. YARP

 

[AProudLefty]

Lie.

Inversion fallacy.

What 'illegal activities'?

YARP

Ignored. You're wasting your time with your trolling.

 

[Into the Night]

Start with the international human rights law.

YARP

 

[AProudLefty]

Fallacy fallacy. YARP

Ignored.

 

[Into the Night]

Ignored.

Ignored. You're wasting your time with your trolling.

Ignored.

YARP. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

 

[AProudLefty]

YARP

AWOAT

 

[FastLane]

What thought process led you to this bizarre conclusion?

His posts ask Lionfish

 

[Into the Night]

Ignored.

Argument of the Stone fallacy.