Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
I asked my search engine to provide a gif about Sybil and it popped up.That's a nice gif. I like it.
I asked my search engine to provide a gif about Sybil and it popped up.That's a nice gif. I like it.
LSD is aTerrible drug Sybil should just say noTrump is not a pedophile, Sybil. You are still hallucinating.
You finally agree!LSD is aTerrible drug Sybil should just say no
Beat me to it.So do we.

Those terrorists have killed more American kids than Al Qaeda. has!They could see the aftermath of the strike, and the mission had been accomplished by destroying the boat.
We're also not at war with Venezuela the way we were in a state of war with Al Qaeda.
The real question is"Are you the kind of person that would believe a Washington Post article."“I can’t imagine anyone, no matter what the circumstance, believing it is appropriate to kill people who are clinging to a boat in the water,” said Michael Schmitt, a former Air Force lawyer and professor emeritus at the U.S. Naval War College. “That is clearly unlawful.”
It doesn’t matter whether the U.S. is in “armed conflict” with drug cartels as the Trump administration asserts. Such a fatal attack would have violated peacetime laws and those governing armed conflict, the experts say.
![]()
What the law says about killing survivors of a boat strike, according to experts
Leveling a second strike on the survivors of an initial attack on an alleged drug boat would have been a crime, legal experts say.www.pbs.org
Trolling and idiocy at it pinnacle.No, Cyborg. The survivors were picked up and sent back to their home country.
Lots of luck with that one.Damn those pesci-terrorists.
Family of fisherman killed in US boat strike files human rights complaint
The family of the Colombian fisherman who was killed in the Sept. 15 U.S. military strike in the Caribbean Sea filed a formal complaint Tuesday with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights alleging the U.S. government illegally killed him.
“From numerous news reports, we know that U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth was responsible for ordering the bombing of boats like those of Alejandro Carranza and the murder of all those on such boats,” they wrote in their petition.
“Secretary Hegseth has admitted that he gave such orders despite the fact that he did not know the identity of those being targeted for these bombings and extra-judicial killings,” they added.
Carranza’s lawyer Dan Kovalik said the fisherman’s family “has no recourse to adequate and effective remedies in Colombia to obtain redress for the injuries they have suffered due to the actions of the United States.”
Hegseth has maintained that the strikes are all legal and claims that the military has evidence that the boats were carrying drugs.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/live-updates/trump-admin-live-updates/?id=127993391
Didn't both Trump and Hegswith admit there was a second strike on survivors and they're blaming some admiral for it?The real question is"Are you the kind of person that would believe a Washington Post article."
No.Didn't both Trump and Hegswith admit there was a second strike on survivors and they're blaming some admiral for it?
They have intercepted communication between the survivor and other drug smugglers. The boat was disabled but not destroyed The order was to destroy the boat. They did not want the drugs being picked up by other smugglers.White House Confirms Second Strike on Alleged Drug Boat and Defends Move as Legal
![]()
White House Confirms and Defends 2nd Strike on Boat, Contradicting Trump
Karoline Leavitt's comments appear to contradict those Trump made a day earlier about the boat strikestime.com
Source?They have intercepted communication between the survivor and other drug smugglers. The boat was disabled but not destroyed The order was to destroy the boat. They did not want the drugs being picked up by other smugglers.
The admiral was given the order to destroy the boat and it contents not to disable the boat so he destroyed the boat and its contents.Didn't both Trump and Hegswith admit there was a second strike on survivors and they're blaming some admiral for it?
My theory is TrumpCo. doesn't want any survivors who might testify it was a pleasure craft, not a drug boat.
Correct, it was a righteous kill keeping dangerous drugs out of our country.They have intercepted communication between the survivor and other drug smugglers. The boat was disabled but not destroyed The order was to destroy the boat. They did not want the drugs being picked up by other smugglers.
Did you serve, Marty?Right, there always being a chance the intelligence got it wrong.