Hegseth issues an illegal order.

[Into the Night]

Okay I re-read your comment. You went full Godwin's law on Obama. Now do the same with Hegseth.

YARP

 

[Into the Night]

You mentioned Hitler. Nobody else.

Lie.

 

[Into the Night]

Perhaps I wasn't being clear. Toby has violated Godwin's law by comparing Obama to Hitler.

As to Lurch? Perhaps you should ask him. Here's an example: did Biden have a book on Hitler's quotes by his bed?

YARP.

 

[Jake Starkey]

OMG! HOAX ALERT!!! I'm a bit behind on the latest from the retard cult known as the democrat party. I just watched several people suddenly calling Hegseth a war criminal, lol. When will the insanity end? Rhetorical question, obviously.

I guess Obama personally signing off on the drone strike that killed an American citizen (Anwar al-Awlaki) without trial, plus the hundreds of other strikes that racked up thousands of civilian deaths with hundreds of 'double taps' too (including plenty of "oops, wrong wedding party" moments) across half a dozen countries we weren't formally at war with... all that was perfectly fine.

Funny how the same crowd that screams "war criminal!' at the drop of a hat suddenly discovered nuance when the guy in the Oval Office had a (D) after his name. Congressional approval? Due process? Collateral damage numbers, 'double and triple taps' that dwarf anything Trump ever did? Crickets.

I'm sure the drone cult has fully explained the hypocrisy by now, right? @AProudLefty, @Jake Starkey, @Jarod, etc. have explained why Obama's kill list and 'signature strikes' were progressive and enlightened while taking out terrorist in a boat full of poison heading for our kids is literally Hitler. I'm sure if they haven't explained, they will soon, don't you think?

 

[Tobytone]

I see Jakey is taking point of the democrat response, lol.

 

[Jake Starkey]

 

[AProudLefty]

I pointed out reality. Now you do the same.

Explain, right now, how you were perfectly fine people were 100% okay with Obama personally authorizing the drone strike that deliberately killed an American citizen (Anwar al-Awlaki) without charge or trial, plus the thousands of other strikes that slaughtered wedding parties, funerals, and entire villages full of innocent civilians across seven countries we were never at war with. Not a peep from you or the rest of the seditious six back then. Funny, isn't it?

Did I say I was fine with it? You rushed in about Obama. Why?

While you're pondering that one out, maybe try a second thought for once: why are Democrats throwing themselves in front of every bullet to stop anyone from hitting the narco-terrorist cartels that traffic fentanyl, traffic children, and openly boast about destroying America?

Name them. Quote them. Nobody wants drugs and terrorists being imported here.

Same party has zero problem shipping billions in precision weapons to blow up Russians and assorted Africans, but touching the cartels that murder 100,000 Americans a year with poison is suddenly 'genocide' and 'Trumpitler must be stopped. TDS or worse?

Citation please. Quote them. Should be easy for you.

'Here's your hint you clearly need: a huge chunk of your party is already bought and paid for by cartel cash. First bribe in the envelope and you're owned for life; say no the second time and you wind up in a ditch with your tongue pulled through your throat. That's not conspiracy, that's the real business model.

Conspiracy theories without evidence are dismissed.

So spare me the fake outrage. Your side with the terrorists poisoning your own country because some of the libtards are on their payroll, the rest are too cowardly to admit Obama was a war criminal who got a Nobel Peace Prize for turning the sky into a kill grid. Own it or stay silent like you always do when the drone operator had a (D) next to his name.

Yeah yeah yeah. I do side with the terrorists and drug traffickers.

You really got me.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I'll take to mean you oppose the investigation because who knows why? Because of TDS? Trump can never make mistakes?

MAGAt cracker retards are weird, but also rabidly dangerous. Their families should do something about them.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

View attachment 66761

It goes all the way to the top. Sad.

 

[Jake Starkey]

We will have to remigrate MAGA families to their origin.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

We will have to remigrate MAGA families to their origin.

To Cracka Retardia? Isn't that a Third World Shithole?

 

[Jake Starkey]

Donald goes to Germany, Melania somewhere in southeastern Europe, and Baron to Columbia uni.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Prove that they made up the sources. After all it's your game.

Learn how grown ups debate.

No one has to prove a negative.

If the little Goebbels claim to have a source, THEY must prove they do. The game of "unnamed sources" doesn't fly anymore. The DNC Propaganda Corps has zero credibility. Lie to me once, shame on you. Lie to me 10 million times, you're WaPo.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Donald goes to Germany, Melania somewhere in southeastern Europe, and Baron to Columbia uni.

And Jakey went on a bender- obviously..

 

[Jake Starkey]

Learn how grown ups debate.

No one has to prove a negative.

If the little Goebbels claim to have a source, THEY must prove they do. The game of "unnamed sources" doesn't fly anymore. The DNC Propaganda Corps has zero credibility. Lie to me once, shame on you. Lie to me 10 million times, you're WaPo.

You do, because you are not trustworthy, and, yes, negatives can be proven.

 

[AProudLefty]

Learn how grown ups debate.

No one has to prove a negative.

If the little Goebbels claim to have a source, THEY must prove they do. The game of "unnamed sources" doesn't fly anymore. The DNC Propaganda Corps has zero credibility. Lie to me once, shame on you. Lie to me 10 million times, you're WaPo.

He always ask me to prove a negative. It's his game.

 

[Truth Detector]

Start with the international human rights law.

Cite the exact assclown. The International Human Rights Law have no bearing on any of this assclown.

 

[Uncensored2008]

You do, because you are not trustworthy,

You're an idiot with a 6th grade education.

Yes, you were promoted through high schools and eventually graduated, but you didn't learn anything past 6th grade.

and, yes, negatives can be proven.

Irrelevant. The "married bachelor" scenario is infantile.

The degree of warrant for a given proposition is the balance of evidence that favors that proposition, not the absence of evidence that would falsify the proposition. The ability to say “You can’t prove I’m not right” does not mean you are warranted in believing you are right.

The onus to support an argument falls to those who present the argument. WaPo cannot be assumed to have legitimate sources without naming those sources. They have been caught on too many occasions fabricating stories to promote the party through claims of unreliable and often outright fictitious sources.

 

[Uncensored2008]

He always ask me to prove a negative. It's his game.

Again, you are presenting claims from WaPo, which is infamous for fabricating claims to promote the party and slander the opposition based on bogus sources. "Unnamed Sources" translates to "We just made it up" when the DNC Propaganda Corps claims it.

 

[Jake Starkey]

You're an idiot with a 6th grade education.

Yes, you were promoted through high schools and eventually graduated, but you didn't learn anything past 6th grade.

Irrelevant. The "married bachelor" scenario is infantile.

The degree of warrant for a given proposition is the balance of evidence that favors that proposition, not the absence of evidence that would falsify the proposition. The ability to say “You can’t prove I’m not right” does not mean you are warranted in believing you are right.

The onus to support an argument falls to those who present the argument. WaPo cannot be assumed to have legitimate sources without naming those sources. They have been caught on too many occasions fabricating stories to promote the party through claims of unreliable and often outright fictitious sources.

No one has challenged on the above level.

You are copying something that seems 'smart' to you.

That is all.

You are a doofus.

And that will not change anytime soon.