Hegseth issues an illegal order.

So in an active war is a US war ship got sunk and sailors abandoned ship with their emergency radios but are stranded and holding on to burning debris, do you think they would be fair game to murder if they were trying to call to other US ships for rescue?
They would if they tried to use those radios and other means to call for military aid and a counterattack. Also, why would anyone "hold on to burning debris?"
 
Will Kegs-breath be thrown under the bus? IMHO, it depends on how badly a public drubbing he gets from various military brass and in any Congressional hearings. But if he goes, who will Trump-icana replace him with? Given that your qualifications come last to having pass an ass-kissing test for him to consider an appointment, I have dim hopes the replacement will be any better.
 
Says the scumbag condoning the pedo party
Thank you for reminding me. Not only are the Democrats the party of death, slavery, lawfare, open borders, government tyranny, oppressive taxation, hatred for America, hatred for children, hatred for US citizens, DEI-hires, violent looting and rioting, racist devisiveness, LGBTTQQIAPPIPALPHABETSOUP+ supremacy, black supremacy, ANTIFA terrorism, BLM terrorism, scientific illiteracy, mathematical incompetence, logical ineptitude, intellectual cowardice, zero solutions, and general extreme undereducation ...

... we now see that pedophiles generally gravitate toward the welcoming Democrats and eventually run the party. The Democrats are the pedo party as well, as it turns out.

Good catch.



[*-DEMOCRATS_are_the_PEDO_PARTY]
 
Ah, that's why you're freaking out about Narco Terrorists being blown up. You're in withdrawals and can't find fentanyl on the streets. Trump has ruined everything. He stopped Biden's importation of sex slaves, and now he's cut off your access to narcotics....
You are saying what the cause is but providing only words not evidence.

We learned in the first term to never accept Trump's words.
 
So in an active war is a US war ship got sunk and sailors abandoned ship with their emergency radios but are stranded and holding on to burning debris, do you think they would be fair game to murder if they were trying to call to other US ships for rescue?
The definitive answer is "no."

The answers are available to anyone and everyone in the Geneva Conventions.

Second Geneva Convention (1949)
*Article 12:
“Members of the armed forces and other persons mentioned in Article 13, who are wounded or sick, as well as shipwrecked at sea, shall be respected and protected in all circumstances. They shall be treated humanely and cared for by the Party to the conflict in whose power they may be, without any adverse distinction founded on sex, race, nationality, religion, political opinions, or any other similar criteria. Any attempts upon their lives, or violence to their persons, shall be strictly prohibited; in particular, they shall not be murdered or exterminated, subjected to torture or biological experiments; they shall not wilfully be left without medical assistance and care, nor shall conditions be created to cause their death.”

*Article 13 (defines who is covered):
“The present Convention shall apply to the wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea, as well as to members of the crews of the merchant marine and the crews of civil aircraft of the Parties to the conflict, who do not benefit by more favourable treatment under any other provisions of international law.”
 
They would if they tried to use those radios and other means to call for military aid and a counterattack. Also, why would anyone "hold on to burning debris?"
So today we find out that the boat was upside down and on fire when the people clinging to it were hit.

Clearly, there would be no communication, communications equipment, working, and no ability to salvage drugs. You are being lied to. There is a reason they will not show us the video.
 
And they we calling other drug smugglers because we heard them.
The boat was upside down, capsized. The boat was on fire. The boat was In the ocean, out of sight of land.

Sorry, there was zero chance they would be calling anyone because the electronics on the boat would be dead, or burnt. And there is no way they were going to un capsize a boat of that size. Have you ever been on a boat before? Have you ever been in the ocean before?

A few years ago, I was out on a boat about that size, a little smaller, One of the two engines stopped working, the boat was not on fire, the boat was not upside down. After about an hour of trying, we were able to reach a tow company. It took them about three hours to come get us, then we were towed in and reached land nine hours after the motor stopped working.

We were very lucky to have accomplished that.
 
This is not true, you were lied to. The boat was capsized, upside down in the water, on fire, the people were not going to be able to climb back on the boat, turn it upside, right, or put out the fire.

Do you like being lied to?
You have been suckered, again.

You were not there.

The order to conduct the second, follow-up strike (referred to as a "double tap") on the alleged drug boat in the Caribbean on September 2, 2025, was given by
Admiral Frank M. "Mitch" Bradley.
According to the White House and the Department of War, Admiral Bradley, who currently commands U.S. Special Operations Command, was "well within his authority and the law" to order the second strike to ensure the vessel and the threat it posed were completely eliminated.
However, reporting from outlets like The Washington Post and CNN, based on anonymous U.S. officials, indicates that the decision was made in the context of an alleged broader verbal directive from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to "kill everybody" or ensure no survivors during the operation.
  • Admiral Bradley's Position: He reportedly told lawmakers in private briefings that there was no specific "kill them all" order and that he made the decision to strike the survivors, who he believed were still a threat or attempting to continue their mission, within his operational command authority.
  • Secretary Hegseth's Position: He has publicly denied giving an illegal order and has stated that he fully supports Admiral Bradley's combat decisions. Hegseth mentioned he watched the first strike live but was not present for the decision to carry out the second strike hours later.
The incident and the legality of the ongoing military campaign against alleged "narco-terrorists" in the Caribbean are currently under investigation and vigorous oversight by both the House and Senate Armed Services and Intelligence Committees.


I trust Admiral Bradley who was the operational commander, more than some receptionist who never served, sucker.
 
Frank Mitchell Bradley is a United States Navy admiral who serves as commander of the United States Special Operations Command since October 3, 2025. He most recently served as commander of Joint Special Operations Command from August 10, 2022 to September 26, 2025.Wikipedia
Born: Eldorado, TX
Education: Naval Postgraduate School(2005), United States Naval Academy(1991), Eldorado High School (1987)
Children: 4
Awards: Legion of Merit, Defense Superior Service Medal (2), Bronze Star Medal (2)
Commands: U.S. Special Operations Command; Joint Special Operations Command; Special Operations Command Central; SEAL Team Six
Rank: Admiral
Service years: 1991–present
 
Back
Top