Hegseth issues an illegal order.

Uncensored2008 said:
The boat was damaged and the crew was calling in reinforcements. You've lost again, fake lawyer.
Click to expand...
You have to be careful on this. If the crew of the narco-boat had all abandoned ship and were in the water calling for rescue, they'd have every right to call for rescue.

Since they remained aboard a valid military target, they made themselves part of the target. At that point, calling for help, taking a piss, slamming a brewski, ... nothing is of any relevance.
 
IBDaMann said:
The target was not eliminated.
Click to expand...
And hostiles were still engaging.

The Marxists were using this ruse to try and cover for the Seditious Six attempting to foment a Military Coup. They have massively failed in the court of public opinion, despite the best efforts of the party Propaganda Corps. Showing just how weak the little Goebbels of the MSM have become.
 
Earl said:
It wasn't destroyed with the first strike.
Click to expand...
What I don't quite get is how the TDS-infected are lightning-fast to point out that the Navy took a second shot that destroyed the boat, but seem thoroughly confused, to the point of denial, when it is mentioned that the first shot did not destroy the boat.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Another Stalinist who thinks Narco-Terrorists are party to the Geneva Convention. An no moron, a second strike doesn't violate anything,

When you KING Obama sent Seal Team 6 to kill bin Laden, with express orders of "no survivors," the brave men didn't fire only a single shot and then go home. They continued to assault until the mission was completed.



This already failed, the terrorists were on a Sat Phone calling in reinforcements. Further, Narco-Terrorists are not party to the convention, moron.


Look, I know you're just trying to excuse the treason of Mark Kelly and the Seditious 6 - but you failed.
Click to expand...
LEARN TO READ ASSHOLE,
And if you need help understanding what the Geneva Convention says get a third grader to help you I am sure they can.
 
Tbird19482 said:
So if they did it you wouldn't cry that they broke the Geneva Convention?
I bet you would be one of the first ones on here that would.
Click to expand...
I'll trust the military, with an aircraft carrier and other Naval support vesicles in the Caribbean, to defend from the Venezuelan Navy.


11 US warships and 15,000 troops now in Caribbean as Venezuela tensions escalate
By Anthony Blair
Published Nov. 30, 2025, 5:41 p.m. ET

More than 10 US warships, including the country’s largest carrier, the USS Gerald R. Ford, are bearing down on the Caribbean amid escalating tensions between President Trump and Venezuela.

A Marine Expeditionary Unit capable of an amphibious land invasion has also been deployed as part of efforts to stem the flow of drugs into the US from the socialist country.

“The military’s job is to defend the homeland,” Secretary of the Navy John Phelan told Fox News on Saturday night. “That’s exactly what we’re doing, and we’re using our best assets to defend the homeland.
The Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group with a B-52 Stratofortress and F/A-18E/F Super Hornets in the Atlantic Ocean. 3
A major US naval and military buildup is under way in the Caribbean. via REUTERS

“Drugs kill more Americans than we’ve ever lost in wars,” he said. “So I think at the end of the day, the president has correctly identified this as an attack on the country, which it is.”

Venezuela’s socialist president, Nicolas Maduro, is being blamed for allowing narco vessels to set off from his country for the US.
 
Earl said:
I'll trust the military, with an aircraft carrier and dozens of other Naval support vesicles in the Caribbean, to defend from the Venezuelan Navy.
Click to expand...
And what if they some how did bomb and disabled one of our ships and then went in and killed all of the survivors ?
Would you be okay with that or be all up in arms crying that they broke the Geneva Convention?
I bet you would be really pissed of that they killed the survivors and broke the Geneva Convention.
But it is okay with you that we killed their survivors and broke the Geneva Convention.
 
Ships

The Navy has eight warships in the region — three destroyers, three amphibious assault ships, a cruiser and a smaller littoral combat ship that’s designed for coastal waters.

The three amphibious assault ships make up an amphibious readiness group and carry an expeditionary unit of Marines. As a result, those ships also have on board a variety of Marine helicopters, Osprey tilt rotor aircraft and Harrier jets that have the capability of either transporting large numbers of Marines or striking targets on land and sea.

While officials have not offered specific numbers, destroyers and cruisers typically deploy with a missile loadout that contains Tomahawk cruise missiles — a missile that can strike hundreds of miles from its launch point.

A U.S. Navy submarine, the USS Newport News, also is operating in the broader area of South America and is capable of carrying and launching cruise missiles.

Planes and drones

A squadron of advanced U.S. Marine Corps F-35B Lightning II jets have been sent to an airstrip in Puerto Rico. The planes were first spotted landing on the island territory in mid-September.

MQ-9 Reaper Air Force drones, capable of flying long distances and carrying up to eight laser-guided missiles, also have been spotted operating out of Puerto Rico by commercial satellites and military watchers, as well as photojournalists, around the same time.

It has been widely reported that the Navy is operating P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft out of the region as well.

Earlier this month, the military released a photo of an U.S. Air Force AC-130J Ghostrider, a heavily armed plane capable of firing its large guns with precision onto ground targets, also sitting on the tarmac in Puerto Rico.
 
Tbird19482 said:
And what if they some how did bomb and disabled one of our ships and then went in and killed all of the survivors ?
Would you be okay with that or be all up in arms crying that they broke the Geneva Convention?
I bet you would be really pissed of that they killed the survivors and broke the Geneva Convention.
But it is okay with you that we killed their survivors and broke the Geneva Convention.
Click to expand...
If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

Our Naval assets are sufficient.
 
FastLane said:
Military lawyers determined the two survivors were collecting drugs and contacting other drug smugglers and were trying to finish their mission so they were still in the fight.
Click to expand...
Show me the exception to this in the Code of Conduct...

  • Enemy personnel in the water from a destroyed vessel are considered hors de combat (out of the fight)
 
Lionfish said:
QPeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee,


Unless they are still engaging in the conflict.
Click to expand...
You too. Read the above and quote the section where they can determine a shipwrecked person, in the water can be deemed 'still in the conflict'. as what i quote requires they be considered the opposite.
 
gigafact.org › fact-briefs › does-fentanyl-kill-moreDoes fentanyl kill more than 100,000 Americans every year?

Nov 14, 2025 · Drug overdoses kill more than 100,000 people annually in the U.S., fentanyl accounts for about 70% of that amount. An estimated 107,543 drug overdose deaths occurred...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top