You just posted the definition. It certainly contains symbols. They are in clear reference to an organization called Turning Point founded by Charlie Kirk. It's clearly political.
By logo, Target clearly means a product or company symbol and or name that doesn't have Target's approval. They don't want their employees wearing clothing that could be construed to endorse a product or advertise a competitor. There is clearly nothing offensive to the average person about the shirt and the stuff printed on it either. Only someone who really hates Charlie Kirk could possibly be offended by it, as that Leftist complaining Karen was.
That isn't the shirt she was wearing. Hers said "Freedom" back and front. The back had the US flag, as did one sleeve. On the front Charlie Krik's name was printed much smaller to one side below the word Freedom. It also appears on the back as part of the flag as shown in your post.
Nice pivot. Fuck you.
That's not what their corporate policy says, and I posted a link to it. So long as the shirt doesn't have a logo--eg., a product or company advertisement etc., it can be worn if it is not considered "offensive." I'd say a shirt that has American flags and the word freedom meets that, even if now deceased Charlie Kirk's name is on it.
It still says solid red. As in only one color.
But the shirt did have the turning point logo on it. It's not allowed. Management should have fired her on the spot.
The shirt is one color, red. The other stuff is printed on a red shirt.
With other color, not making it solid.
No I would not. In fact I have eaten at a restaurant where the waitress was wearing a Communist revolutionary's face on the T Shirt and I tipped her because she did a good job. For the most part this kind of virtue signaling is a Leftist thing.
