If God were real, you wouldn’t need a book

[Freddy Figbottom]

Probability math uses no random numbers and does not generate any random numbers. Probability math is not random number math.

yet probability math is how humanity attempts to cope with randomness.

your choking on your own gay strawman dicks.

 

[Cypress]

The gods that man believe in, and often structure their lives around, are much more relevant and important than any unknown, ambiguous being that could have somehow been involved in the creation of "everything".

Yes...man has consistently manufactured invisible beings to explain/control the world around him.

It sounds like you belatedly want theism in this discussion to be defined as just the Bronze Age pagan gods and the Abrahamistic god of antiquity - aka, you want the definition of theism to be redefined to the gods you personally find annoying or ridiculous.

It's probably a lot harder to ridicule pantheism, Deism, Spinoza's god, etc.

 

[FastLane]

If God wanted robots He would have never given Man free will. God gave us the Bible because he wants Man to seek Him. You have to prayerfully study the Bible to fully understand God's plan for Man.

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

It sounds like you belatedly want theism in this discussion to be defined as just the Bronze Age pagan gods and the Abrahamistic god of antiquity - aka, you want the definition of theism to be redefined to the gods you personally find annoying or ridiculous.

It's probably a lot harder to ridicule pantheism, Deism, Spinoza's god, etc.

and you're a Zionist kill bot freak.

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

So all you have is complete misrepresentation as a pivot away from your having tipped your king.

A forfeit is a forfeit.

belief in a thing is not evidence for a thing.

that;s called the appeal to popularity fallacy.

it is a single morsel of weak evidence, but most considered a fallacy sans better arguments.

 

[ZenMode]

Oddly enough, they are.
They have even been used in proofs.

No they aren't. If a thought is incorrect, it doesn't make the proof a proof.

I do it quite often. I drive on it too.

In water isn't on water.

Never seen one talk. The Bible never describes one talking either.

It does.

It DOES describe God talking from what appeared to be a burning bush though (though the 'bush' was never consumed).

Word games.

Well, I tried, but you insist on word games.

 

[ZenMode]

It sounds like you belatedly want theism in this discussion to be defined as just the Bronze Age pagan gods and the Abrahamistic god of antiquity - aka, you want the definition of theism to be redefined to the gods you personally find annoying or ridiculous.

It's probably a lot harder to ridicule pantheism, Deism, Spinoza's god, etc.

It's not difficult to ridicule any made-up gods from any age.

 

[Into the Night]

Misrepresentation

YARP

 

[Into the Night]

Right and as we know, religion is about faith, not reason and logic

False dichotomy fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

argument to popularity.

it;s considered a fallacy.

YARP. Fallacy fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

No they aren't. If a thought is incorrect, it doesn't make the proof a proof.

Special pleading fallacy.

In water isn't on water.

On the water, I assure you.

It does.

Never did. You are deluded.

Word games.

Inversion fallacy. You can't blame your word games on anybody else.

Well, I tried, but you insist on word games.

Inversion fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

It's not difficult to ridicule any made-up gods from any age.

How do you know they are made up??

 

[Into the Night]

yet probability math is how humanity attempts to cope with randomness.

your choking on your own gay strawman dicks.

Probability math uses no random numbers and does not generate any random numbers. Probability math is not random number math.

 

[Into the Night]

It sounds like you belatedly want theism in this discussion to be defined as just the Bronze Age pagan gods and the Abrahamistic god of antiquity - aka, you want the definition of theism to be redefined to the gods you personally find annoying or ridiculous.

It's probably a lot harder to ridicule pantheism, Deism, Spinoza's god, etc.

He has no idea what 'theism' means. Neither do you.

 

[Into the Night]

If God wanted robots He would have never given Man free will. God gave us the Bible because he wants Man to seek Him. You have to prayerfully study the Bible to fully understand God's plan for Man.

The council of God and Jesus Christ is freedom of choice. A robot has no choice.
The council of Satan is compulsion.

 

[IBDaMann]

belief in a thing is not evidence for a thing.

Sure it is, depending on the person. "Evidence" is entirely subjective.

that;s called the appeal to popularity fallacy.

Argumentum ad populum. Yes, for some people, only the truth can get so many people to believe something like that.

 

[Into the Night]

belief in a thing is not evidence for a thing.

Yes it is.

that;s called the appeal to popularity fallacy.

Fallacy fallacy. YARP

it is a single morsel of weak evidence, but most considered a fallacy sans better arguments.

Fallacy fallacy. True Scotsman fallacy. Evidence is not a fallacy.

 

[ZenMode]

False dichotomy fallacy.

Incoherent babbling.

 

[ZenMode]

How do you know they are made up??

Why do you believe they are real?

 

[AProudLefty]

NDE and OOBE are good evidence of the existence of souls or consciousness.