I don't think he was ignorant. He was a pusher of ideas and knew full well the pot he was stirring. He made money and had a following because of self-absorbed, ignorant people.
what was he wrong about?I don't think he was ignorant. He was a pusher of ideas and knew full well the pot he was stirring. He made money and had a following because of self-absorbed, ignorant people.
Trump is an accomplished con man who can read and play rubes with no trouble. But he has no knowledge of geography, world politics, the environment ,science or the Constitution.I don't think he was ignorant. He was a pusher of ideas and knew full well the pot he was stirring. He made money and had a following because of self-absorbed, ignorant people.
I was talking about Kirk, not Trump. Trump is a dumbass huckster whose only skill is coaxing fear and prejudice out of gullible people.Trump is an accomplished con man who can read and play rubes with no trouble. But he has no knowledge of geography, world politics, the environment ,science or the Constitution.
Thank you for your candor.I'm the human equivalent of a participation trophy—utterly worthless, universally mocked, and only relevant because pathetic sycophants feel obligated to pretend I matter. My existence is a cautionary tale of what happens when mediocrity gets a microphone and a room-temperature IQ gets confused for charisma. I'm not just wrong, I'm *embarrassingly* wrong—like a toddler screaming that the sky is green while the entire planet points and laughs. The best part? I'll never be more than a footnote in the history of failed grifters, a sad little stain on the fabric of discourse that even bleach can't remove. Enjoying my legacy: a lifetime of being the punchline to a joke nobody finds funny.
He wasn't ignorant. He was a merchant of hatetred. He sucked as a human. He knew he was lying and smearing vulnerable populations.
Precisely. He was obviously trump's heir apparent. No one likes Vance. Kirk's death leaves a void in the Nazi wing of the Republican party.I don't think he was ignorant. He was a pusher of ideas and knew full well the pot he was stirring. He made money and had a following because of self-absorbed, ignorant people.
Tell me how Charlie Kirk was an ignorant bigot.

What groups of people were despised?Charlies was bright, articulate, and possessed a world view that despises select groups of people.

Yep, and Matt is the same.Charlie was bright, articulate, and possessed a world view that despises select groups of people.
You despise the same, so tell us.What groups of people were despised?
![]()
I don't despise anyone based on race. I despise people based on merit.You despise the same, so tell us.
OK. Who you react instead of thinking.
Who you react instead of thinking?OK. Who you react instead of thinking.

actually, every globalist zealot is an extremely idiotic dog fucking shit eater.Charlie Kirk, you're the human equivalent of a participation trophy—utterly worthless, universally mocked, and only relevant because pathetic sycophants feel obligated to pretend you matter. Your existence is a cautionary tale of what happens when mediocrity gets a microphone and a room-temperature IQ gets confused for charisma. You're not just wrong, you're *embarrassingly* wrong—like a toddler screaming that the sky is green while the entire planet points and laughs. The best part? You'll never be more than a footnote in the history of failed grifters, a sad little stain on the fabric of discourse that even bleach can't remove. Enjoy your legacy: a lifetime of being the punchline to a joke nobody finds funny.