Fascist…

[Jarod]

You would be correct IF SHE HAD NOT STRUCK HIM WITH A 4,500 POUND SUV. But she did. Your blatant hypocrisy is duly noted.

He put himself in the path of the SUV, and it is clear that he fired his weapon after he was bumped by the SUV, not to prevent being hit, but to punish her.

 

[Number Six]

Stop idiots from calling this "self defense"​

https://www.reddit.com/r/AntiTrumpAlliance/comments/1q6vqv0/stop_idiots_from_calling_this_self_defense

 

[FastLane]

She bumped him, and then the officer fired his weapon. After the danger was passed.

He fired through her windshield using a gun in his right hand and the bullet struck her . Please explain that trajectory.

 

[Jarod]

There is no question here. Are you asking one or just rhetorically stating that "A person who will" <insert something BS here>...

Will you reluctantly admit that driving a car at an officer can be seen by the officer as something that can cause immense bodily harm and even death?

I do have a question for you, since you seem to want one. Are you able to hear the first gunshot, after the sound of him being bumped?

 

[Jarod]

He fired through her windshield using a gun in his right hand and the bullet struck her . Please explain that trajectory.

Yes, One can reach the left lower windshield with their right hand at point blank range, even after they have been bumped. That shows you how slow Good was driving, even after being bumped, he was able to kill her.

If he was in so much danger, why was he able to fire such a good shot after being bumped?

Back to the question that you have ignored, is simply resisting an officer a good reason for them to kill someone?

 

[FastLane]

I do my best to ignore Gork and Stony, it’s not worth it arguing with stupid.

Democoes did not express the opinion that failure to obey police officers should result in death. He at least is arguing the facts, as his biased mind sees them.

So why did you include me? Link me up the where I said such of thing or just admit you are trying to smear me with a lie.

 

[Damocles]

I do have a question for you, since you seem to want one. Are you able to hear the first gunshot, after the sound of him being bumped?

I am able to hear the first shot at the same time he is being bumped. In fact I wonder if the first shot happened involuntarily.

 

[Jarod]

He fired through her windshield using a gun in his right hand and the bullet struck her . Please explain that trajectory.

So why did you include me? Link me up the where I said such of thing or just admit you are trying to smear me with a lie.

I’d have to look, I guess I just assumed you had said such things, I apologize if you have not.

 

[Jarod]

I am able to hear the first shot at the same time he is being bumped. In fact I wonder if the first shot happened involuntarily.

Not me. I hear it after the sound of the bump.

Additionally, obviously, she was going at a speed that would not be able to harm the officer, because he was not harmed.

Imagine a scenario where a police officer knows for a fact that a gun is inoperable, but a person pointed it at him, would you believe that the officer has a right to kill the person?

 

[FastLane]

Yes, One can reach the left lower windshield with their right hand at point blank range, even after they have been bumped.

If he was in so much danger, why was he able to fire such a good shot after being bumped?

Back to the question that you have ignored, is simply resisting an officer a good reason for them to kill someone?

Can you show that contortion in any video because the videos that I have seen he steps away from the SUV and not toward it.

 

[FastLane]

Not me. I hear it after the sound of the bump.

Additionally, obviously, she was going at a speed that would not be able to harm the officer, because he was not harmed.

Imagine a scenario where a police officer knows for a fact that a gun is inoperable, but a person pointed it at him, would you believe that the officer has a right to kill the person?

Her tires were spinning. Her spouse was screaming at her to flee. I suspect she got excited an gunned it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Good was retreating, not only was resisting an officer she was breaking and entering and shouting threats at high level government officials, while breaking into an area where they were being protected.

Good was fleeing to avoid arrest and ran over police in her attempt to escape.

You support violence against and attempted murder of federal agents upholding the laws passed by congress.

 

[Damocles]

Not me. I hear it after the sound of the bump.

Additionally, obviously, she was going at a speed that would not be able to harm the officer, because he was not harmed.

Imagine a scenario where a police officer knows for a fact that a gun is inoperable, but a person pointed it at him, would you believe that the officer has a right to kill the person?

If he magically knows the gun is inoperable, of course not. I do not believe that reasonable folks will be convinced he "knew" that, after being dragged by another car... I think you are reaching, hard, and deliberately ignoring evidence.

 

[FastLane]

I’d have to look, I guess I just assumed you had said such things, I apologize if you have not.

Now show us where TOP said such a thing

 

[TOP]

Good was retreating, not only was resisting an officer she was breaking and entering and shouting threats at high level government officials, while breaking into an area where they were being protected.

Ok....

 

[LurchAddams]

I do my best to ignore Gork and Stony, it’s not worth it arguing with stupid.

Democoes did not express the opinion that failure to obey police officers should result in death. He at least is arguing the facts, as his biased mind sees them.

My mistake.

 

[FastLane]

Good was retreating, not only was resisting an officer she was breaking and entering and shouting threats at high level government officials, while breaking into an area where they were being protected.

Babbitt should have been arrested then.

 

[Number Six]

new CPAC poster dropped​

 

[FastLane]

My mistake.

Lots of liberal mistakes in this thread.

 

[TOP]

He put himself in the path of the SUV, and it is clear that he fired his weapon after he was bumped by the SUV, not to prevent being hit, but to punish her.

You truly believe he fired to "punish her...."