Poll: Should all reactions generate a positive score?

Should every reaction bring positive points?

  • Total voters
    12
  • This poll will close: .
Damocles

Damocles

Accedo!
Staff member
The goal is interaction, you get to express how much you like or dislike the other person's post. Since the interaction is happening should it all be positive points? I can create more "reactions", and I think it may stop those who think these points can be spent like cash from constantly reacting...
 
Who gives a shit? Between Finger Boy's (Diesel) giving me the finger on every post and Duck's Dork (Dutch) vomiting as if he has bulimia on every post I make, it's become an irrelevancy. Toss in the Foul Owl as a third doing the same. When you give everything a thumbs up or down those have no meaning or value. It's like getting a participation trophy.

I, on the other hand, have given out exactly one thumb's up to a post since the board transitioned to this format. One. That has meaning.
 
I would like to see a small emoji tax. Pay to play. Let's see how long those cheap lefties continue with their childlike games.
 
AProudLefty said:
Certain posters thrive on it.

You know who you are. ;)
Click to expand...
It’s in this post:
T. A. Gardner said:
Who gives a shit? Between Finger Boy's (Diesel) giving me the finger on every post and Duck's Dork (Dutch) vomiting as if he has bulimia on every post I make, it's become an irrelevancy. Toss in the Foul Owl as a third doing the same. When you give everything a thumbs up or down those have no meaning or value. It's like getting a participation trophy.

I, on the other hand, have given out exactly one thumb's up to a post since the board transitioned to this format. One. That has meaning.
Click to expand...
Add naked hunter.
 
Damocles said:
The goal is interaction, you get to express how much you like or dislike the other person's post. Since the interaction is happening should it all be positive points? I can create more "reactions", and I think it may stop those who think these points can be spent like cash from constantly reacting...
Click to expand...
I'm a positive person - I don't like seeing negative scores.
 
Damocles said:
The goal is interaction, you get to express how much you like or dislike the other person's post. Since the interaction is happening should it all be positive points? I can create more "reactions", and I think it may stop those who think these points can be spent like cash from constantly reacting...
Click to expand...
Earl pukes on people's posts for years and never a peep out of the MAGA morons because he was "sticking it to the leftists". Non-MAGAts start returning in kind and the MAGA morons go ballistic.

What a bunch of weak, stupid and pathetic pieces of shit they have all proved to be.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Who gives a shit? Between Finger Boy's (Diesel) giving me the finger on every post and Duck's Dork (Dutch) vomiting as if he has bulimia on every post I make, it's become an irrelevancy. Toss in the Foul Owl as a third doing the same. When you give everything a thumbs up or down those have no meaning or value. It's like getting a participation trophy.

I, on the other hand, have given out exactly one thumb's up to a post since the board transitioned to this format. One. That has meaning.
Click to expand...
Moosakofsky said:
I don’t understand the question but they thrive in giving negs. Why, I don’t understand.
Click to expand...
QED on the hypocrisy of MAGAts and Earl's behavior.
 
AProudLefty said:
Could be. He has a site to run. I consider him to be honest.

As to Legion? I do not know.
Click to expand...
He protects Legina like a GF. He calls anyone who doesn't like Trump a "leftist". This isn't just about business with him. He's pushing his own pro-Trump agenda and seeks to drive out anyone who doesn't agree.

TBH, it's starting to work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top