I think pinheads are going to LOVE Sharia Law!

THe fear mongering has begun, all sane people know that Sharia law aint coming to the USA...

We have been fighting back Christian law for 200+ years, we can keep Sharia law back for a few Im sure...!
Christians don't force you at the point of a sword, infidel. :)
 
Christians don't force you at the point of a sword, infidel. :)

Not anymore, now days they try to use the power of Government to force there belifes on my family and me and they try to use the Government schools to persue my children.
 
Not anymore, now days they try to use the power of Government to force there belifes on my family and me and they try to use the Government schools to persue my children.

You're deluded if you believe christians are more controlling than muslims. You are seriously living in a reality devoid of truth.
 
You're deluded if you believe christians are more controlling than muslims. You are seriously living in a reality devoid of truth.

I never said that Christians are more controlling than Muslims, why do you feel you need to lie to try to make a point?
 
You implied it, whore. Now grow up and have a discussion.

Stop with the implication shit, you always imagine I am implying something I am not.

I say what I mean and mean what I say..

Stop imagining I am saying things I am not, you are lying to yourself and to others.
 
Stop with the implication shit, you always imagine I am implying something I am not.

I say what I mean and mean what I say..

Stop imagining I am saying things I am not, you are lying to yourself and to others.

You were talking about christians using government to push their beliefs on you. Try to keep up with your own moronic utterances.
 
You were talking about christians using government to push their beliefs on you. Try to keep up with your own moronic utterances.

I dont denly I was talking about that...

I was not implying that Christians are more controlling than Muslims.
 
Not anymore, now days they try to use the power of Government to force there belifes on my family and me and they try to use the Government schools to persue my children.
Cite.

It is you libs that use the government and public schools, not us Christians. As usual you accuse your enemy of having your tactics.
 
Cite.

It is you libs that use the government and public schools, not us Christians. As usual you accuse your enemy of having your tactics.

If you will reread his post, he said "try to use".

And that is accurate. Fundamentalist christians have tried to use the power of the gov't to force the teaching of Intelligent Design, tried to reinstate prayer in schools, and tried to have the 10 Commandments as the sole decoration in at least one judicial building lobby.
 
Christians don't force you at the point of a sword, infidel. :)

Who says? Christians have tried many times to force their will upon others. They lost. You crybabies can whine all you want about how islam is some unstoppable force, it is not. The force of science and reason, brought about and sustained by free inquiry, is.

Now go back to washing your urine soaked sheets.
 
You need a lesson in history, as do many pinhead liberal democrats..

The 26th amendment...voting age...passed the Senate 94-0
and the House 401-19
On July 5, 1971, during the amendment's signing ceremony in the East Room, President Richard Nixon talked about his confidence in the youth of America.

I guess that might quality as being supported by liberals....and conservatives also, you fool!

The ERA Amendment was shit canned by a majority of the states...

There were no amendments involved expanding civil rights. And the democrats fought tooth and nail against Civil Rights laws for years....

A Democrat spoke for twenty-four hours and eighteen minutes during a 1957 filibuster of a civil rights bill.
Democrats also filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Yo, you didn’t address why conservatives routinely support constitutional amendments based on religious fundamentalism – i.e., school prayer, gay marriage bans, anti-reproductive choice – if your and Dixie’s premise is correct, that liberals are in fact the theocracy-supporters.

Care to explain?

To the extent liberal lefties rarely and infrequently ever try to alter the constitution; it appears to have always been in the context of expanding civil rights, not contracting them. Equal rights for women, and the 18 year old voting age being the most recent, and infrequent examples.

The voting age amendment was indeed a bipartisan vote in the congress. But here’s a tip Professor Bravo: 100 old white guys in the senate aren’t the catalysts for civil rights changes. Reducing the voting age to 18 was catalyzed by college kids and young people who didn’t think they should have to kill Vietnamese without having the right to vote. College kids in the 1960s, a hotbed of conservative activism?? I think not.

On the 1960s civil rights, the Dixiecrats were social conservatives who switched to the Republican Party 40 years ago. I didn’t say anything in my post about political parties – I unambiguously framed my post in the context of liberals and conservatives. The republican were a tiny minority in congress in 1964; as a small minority they had no parliamentary power to introduce legislation. The 1964 CRA was introduced by Democratic congressional leadership with the support of President Johnson. And as with the voting age amendment, the lion’s share of the credit is not due to a few hundred old white guys in congress. The catalyst for the 1964 CRA act were black Americans, and their diffuse smattering of white liberal allies, who put their necks on the line to demand equal rights.


Bottom line, I find your premise that liberals are the theocrat-supporters, and the implication that conservatives are innocent bystanders who only support expanding civil rights to be laughable and transparently dishonest. No one with a shred of honesty is buying it. Is lying so routine and commonplace for you dudes, that you’re incapable of living outside your fact-free bubble of the wingnutosphere?


Now, do you have a plausible and honest explanation for why liberals are allegedly the supporters of theocracy, when history unequivocally shows that it's conservatives - and conservatives alone - who routinely try to change federal and state constitutions to reflect fundamentalist religious values?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top