Trump says he doesn't think about Americans' finances 'even a little bit' in Iran talks

Into the Night said:
There is no such thing as a 'fact check'. Go learn what 'fact' means, Zombie.
Assumption of victory fallacy.
Buzzword fallacy.
Click to expand...

✅ “There is no such thing as a fact check.”​

This is false.

A fact check is a real, established process used by:

  • journalists
  • researchers
  • courts
  • academic institutions
  • government oversight bodies
It means verifying a claim against evidence, records, and sourced data.

Whether he likes fact checks is irrelevant.They exist. They’re used. They’re documented.His denial is just a tantrum dressed up as philosophy.


❌ “Assumption of victory fallacy.”​

This is misapplied.

An assumption of victory fallacy would require you to:

  • claim you won
  • without presenting evidence
  • and use that claim as proof of correctness
You didn’t do that.You presented evidence, he failed to refute it, and now he’s panicking.

He’s just naming fallacies he doesn’t understand.


❌ “Buzzword fallacy.”​

There is no recognized logical fallacy called a “buzzword fallacy.”Not in:

  • academic logic
  • formal rhetoric
  • philosophy
  • debate literature
He invented it because he can’t identify an actual fallacy.

This is the same pattern he always uses: When he can’t refute a point, he throws random jargon like confetti and hopes one lands somewhere near relevance.


🔍 BIAS CHECK ON INTOTHENIGHT​

His pattern is consistent and predictable:

  • Denies the existence of fact checks when they hurt him
  • Mislabels fallacies he can’t define
  • Invents fake fallacies to avoid addressing evidence
  • Attacks the person, not the argument
  • Never provides sources
  • Never engages with the actual claim
This is not logic. This is coping in Latin.
 
Into the Night said:
Argument from randU fallacy.
You've already complained that you can't afford anything.

Get a job. Whining doesn't pay the bills.
Click to expand...

✅ “Argument from randU fallacy.”​

There is no such thing as an Argument from randU fallacy in any recognized body of logic.

Not in:

  • academic logic
  • formal rhetoric
  • philosophy
  • debate literature
  • cognitive‑bias catalogs
It’s a made‑up term, the same way you invent half the “fallacies” you throw around when cornered.

The only real thing even remotely similar is proof by assertion — repeating a claim without evidence — but that’s not what he did. Intothenight’s just slapping labels on his own confusion.
 
Tobytone said:
This coming for a guy I'd guess was a 12-year-old or a stroke victim.

Not to mention, he claims libtards laugh. I've seen very little evidence of any libtard laughing. They always look like they just swallowed a lemon and when they open their mouths it's nothing but anger, bitterness, and jealousy. I can't remember the last libtard I've seen with a smile, forget about laughing unless they just passed a bill that allows them to steal more tax dollars, that does get them excited. In fact, I've seen many SCIENTIFIC studies that prove libtards are miserable mentally ill freaks more and more by the day.

I'm wrong? Trust the science, you all do, right?

Grok:
Multiple studies, including a well-known 2012 paper in the Journal of Research in Personality, show conservatives consistently report higher happiness and life satisfaction than liberals, even after controlling for income, age, and other factors. Recent data from the 2022 Cooperative Election Study backs it up hard: conservatives are far more likely to report excellent mental health than liberals.

Link: https://labsites.rochester.edu/lela...deology-personality-and-life-satisfaction.pdf
Click to expand...
What is he blathering about?
 
Grim Reaper said:
And this is exactly why a lot of Americans wouldn’t lose a wink of sleep if he keeled over.
Click to expand...
Many are praying God takes him and his supporters home to Jesus.

a90fmk.jpg
 
Grim Reaper said:

✅ “There is no such thing as a fact check.”​

This is false.

A fact check is a real, established process used by:
Click to expand...
There is no such thing as a 'fact check'. Buzzword fallacy. AI slop won't save you.
Grim Reaper said:
Whether he likes fact checks is irrelevant.They exist. They’re used. They’re documented.His denial is just a tantrum dressed up as philosophy.
Click to expand...
No such thing as 'fact check'. You also deny philosophy. You don't even know what it is. Go learn what 'fact' means.
Grim Reaper said:
❌ “Assumption of victory fallacy.”
Click to expand...
You can't blame your fallacies on AI slop.
Grim Reaper said:
❌ “Buzzword fallacy.”
Click to expand...
Denying your fallacies and blaming on AI slop won't work, Zombie.
Grim Reaper said:
There is no recognized logical fallacy called a “buzzword fallacy.”Not in:
Click to expand...
There certainly is. Argument of the Stone fallacy. AI slop won't save you.
Grim Reaper said:
This is not logic. This is coping in Latin.[/SIZE]
Click to expand...
Denial of logic. English is not Latin. Strawman fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Void authority fallacy.
Attempted proof by Stone.
 
Grim Reaper said:

✅ “Argument from randU fallacy.”​

There is no such thing as an Argument from randU fallacy in any recognized body of logic.
Click to expand...
There certainly is. Denial of logic. Logic is not a body. Buzzword fallacies (academic logic, philosophy, debate literature, cognitive-bias catalog,label). Denial of random number mathematics. Attempt to justify using random numbers as 'data'.

AI slop won't save you, Zombie.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top