Rasmussen: Gingrich soars ahead of Mittens by 21%

Such a big difference in forty-eight hours? Just what did Newtie do over the last two days, I must have missed it.

Again, your poll average includes polls from a MONTH ago. The second most recent poll was Nov 18-20. Almost two weeks ago. The most recent is the one ditzie is quoting. The others are all over TWO weeks ago.

It wasn't a shift in the last 48 hours.
 
It's very interesting to me... Why did Republicans drop Cain due to extramarital affairs and go directly to Newt who is the king of extramarital affairs?

I think this is evidence you don't have any idea what's going on in the real world. Cain was never "dropped due to extramarital affairs" as you believe. You are totally and completely wrong about that. Several things factor into Cain's demise, the ALLEGED affairs are just one thing. More notably, is the way Cain handled it, many people felt he mishandled it from the start. Then there is the issue of Cain's policy depth, and whether he has the background experience to deal with crucial national security issues. The more the voters saw Cain struggle with those type of questions, and have moments of long pause, where he didn't seem to know what to say... the more they lost confidence in him, and I think that had far more to do with his fall than the trumped up and fake affairs bullshit.

Newt's baggage has been out there, we've known all about it for years. He admits it, owns it, and has repented for it, and now he is moving on to policy and staying on message. This old stuff isn't going to hurt him, because he is confident (and somewhat brilliant) on policy. You see, conservatives aren't as shallow and petty as dunderhead liberal dims, the man's personal life is not the biggest concern for us, we want a person who understands conservative principles, and can articulate them. But beyond that, we really want someone who can think on their feet, and put things in perspective in a 15 second sound bite, so that everyone can understand it. Newt is the master of that.
 
Newt's surge is proof that people are hungry for solutions and sick and tired of the Oblama game coming out of DC.

ANYONE BUT OBAMA- 2012
 
I must point out that Cain is not alleged to have had extramarital affairs. He is alleged to have had an extra-marital affair, in addition to sexually harrassing several women underlings in the workplace.

Sexual harrassment is not an affair! Rape is not sex! These are good things to learn and pass on to your sons.
 
It's very interesting to me... Why did Republicans drop Cain due to extramarital affairs and go directly to Newt who is the king of extramarital affairs?

I know you are just being your normally obtuse self.... but if you don't know the difference between extramarital affairs and sexual harrassment/assault... then perhaps you should read up on what each entails. Try starting with the term consensual.
 
I must point out that Cain is not alleged to have had extramarital affairs. He is alleged to have had an extra-marital affair, in addition to sexually harrassing several women underlings in the workplace.

Sexual harrassment is not an affair! Rape is not sex! These are good things to learn and pass on to your sons.

No means yes and yes means anal!
 
Newt's surge is proof that people are hungry for solutions and sick and tired of the Oblama game coming out of DC.

ANYONE BUT OBAMA- 2012

It's actually the 4th example of how much conservatives don't want to vote for the eventual nominee, Mitt Romney. I expect Newt to go the way of Bachmann, Perry & Cain in pretty short order, when voters remember all of his baggage.
 
You are full of shit Ditzie, not only did you make the claim, you continued trying to debate it and stuck to your guns. Only after you got your ass kicked on the topic did you start pretending you were 'just joking'.

Fuck you, you lying piece of shit! I didn't DEBATE a goddamn thing! I stated CORRECTLY that many Christians do not consider Catholicism to be Christianity, and you never refuted that, because there is no refutation, because it's a fucking TRUE STATEMENT! I didn't ever pretend I was "just joking" ...again... I correctly pointed out that my comment was sarcastic, and meant to take a deliberate dig at Catholics. You read sarcasm as some sort of argumentative challenge, and proceeded to act like a jackass for 3 pages of a thread, blowing every fuse in your muddled little mind, that I had 'attacked' your personal religion... even though your devoutly Catholic ass CLAIMS to be agnostic. Yep... it sure as hell ruffled your feathers, what I said, which is EXACTLY WHY I SAID IT! dumbfuck!
 
You probably never heard it because Cawacko made it up at 3am in a bar one night! I bet if you look back far enough you can find him drunkenly posting it here from his blackberry!

LOL - he posts from his blackberry when he's out? I'm pretty addicted to the board, admittedly, but that's hardcore...
 
Fuck you, you lying piece of shit! I didn't DEBATE a goddamn thing! I stated CORRECTLY that many Christians do not consider Catholicism to be Christianity, and you never refuted that, because there is no refutation, because it's a fucking TRUE STATEMENT! I didn't ever pretend I was "just joking" ...again... I correctly pointed out that my comment was sarcastic, and meant to take a deliberate dig at Catholics. You read sarcasm as some sort of argumentative challenge, and proceeded to act like a jackass for 3 pages of a thread, blowing every fuse in your muddled little mind, that I had 'attacked' your personal religion... even though your devoutly Catholic ass CLAIMS to be agnostic. Yep... it sure as hell ruffled your feathers, what I said, which is EXACTLY WHY I SAID IT! dumbfuck!

Nah, SF is right - you stated it as your view, and argued it to death. The fact that you're getting so freaked about it here basically shows that you realize that, as well...
 
Fuck you, you lying piece of shit! I didn't DEBATE a goddamn thing! I stated CORRECTLY that many Christians do not consider Catholicism to be Christianity, and you never refuted that, because there is no refutation, because it's a fucking TRUE STATEMENT! I didn't ever pretend I was "just joking" ...again... I correctly pointed out that my comment was sarcastic, and meant to take a deliberate dig at Catholics. You read sarcasm as some sort of argumentative challenge, and proceeded to act like a jackass for 3 pages of a thread, blowing every fuse in your muddled little mind, that I had 'attacked' your personal religion... even though your devoutly Catholic ass CLAIMS to be agnostic. Yep... it sure as hell ruffled your feathers, what I said, which is EXACTLY WHY I SAID IT! dumbfuck!

LMAO... yeah, sure ditzie. You just said it because you wanted to ruffle my feathers because you think I am a 'devout' Catholic pretending to be an agnostic. A devout Catholic who hasn't been inside a church (other than weddings and funerals) in over 25 years. Just because I can correct your complete ignorance with regards to what the Catholic church is or isn't, doesn't make me a Catholic you fucking dolt. You stated a complete absurdity, you continued to defend your absurdity until you finally realized what a complete and total moron you were and then and ONLY THEN did you start pretending you were just joking/being sarcastic.

The only lying piece of shit here ditzie is YOU.
 
Nah, SF is right - you stated it as your view, and argued it to death. The fact that you're getting so freaked about it here basically shows that you realize that, as well...

If he pretends that entire thread doesn't exist then it magically goes the way of 1/3 and actually ceases to exist. Did you not know this?
 
LOL - he posts from his blackberry when he's out? I'm pretty addicted to the board, admittedly, but that's hardcore...

I only did that a few times (multiple?) back in 2008 when I was sent to Boston for 9 months for work and I didn't know anyone. I'd go out alone and sometimes end up drinking and posting. Never a good combination.
 
Back
Top