Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
I chose heterosexuality so i could get married. because being married is so awesome.
Again....under strict scrutiny is you or the state that must provide the compelling interest.
what does that have to do with gays being allowed to marry? your claim necessarily means that if gays are allowed to marry, then hetorosexuals would no longer procreate. .
Thats not some special rule for gays only. Applies equally in the case of the single mother and grandmother. I'll take your dodge as an admission that you have no such justification
Those are court decisions, not me, all, directly contradicting your claim. I'll interpret this dodge, like the last.
LOLOLOL You havent yet even comprehended my argument. Some kind of willful ignorance or stuck on stupid?
so your claim is that heterosexual marriage is special treatment? if so, you need to be more clear in your arguments.
Where you getting lost. If its not made available to any two consenting adults its special treatment, yet you have no justification for such special treatment. .
you clearly have no clue how scrutiny is applied in a court of law.
That is such a fantasy, you being a white male would say such a foolish thing.
http://articles.latimes.com/1986-10-25/news/mn-7435_1_republican-national-committee
.......the program's sole purpose is to purge ineligible voters from voting roles.
I chose heterosexuality so i could get married. because being married is so awesome.
That's always been my position. The State grants a privilege license to those who qualify because it benefits society.i'm glad you agree the issue is not a religious issue under our current government and its laws.
That's always been my position. The State grants a privilege license to those who qualify because it benefits society.
Although you've NEVER been able to quantify precisely how marriage "benefits society."
Just one more question you've dodged repeatedly.
States don't require a 'precise quantification' to justify their laws, Zippy. Are you now claiming that marriage does not benefit the state?Although you've NEVER been able to quantify precisely how marriage "benefits society."
Just one more question you've dodged repeatedly.
Although you've NEVER been able to quantify precisely how marriage "benefits society."
Just one more question you've dodged repeatedly.
More children with the benefit of both their mother and father in the home to provide and care for them and fewer born into the alternative of one or neither. Children born to single parents have higher rates of poverty, juvenile delinquincy, drug and alchohol addiction, teen pregnancy, HS dropouts and criminal convictions as an adult.
That's always been my position. The State grants a privilege license to those who qualify because it benefits society.
Those were all court cases applying scrutiny, directly in contradiction to your claims. Got anything other than your personal opinions to support your assertions?......yeah, I didnt think so.
Yurt, if you're really pro gay, you need to reject the abrahamic faiths outright. Sorry. It's the way it is.