NBC fires producer over edited Zimmerman 911 call

Darla said:
Well, he's dead by Zimmerman's gunshot...I'm guessing that proves that some where along the way he found out Zimmerman was armed, ya know? Yeah, the bullet in him really clears that up Grind.
Click to expand...

It looks like he found out, right about the time he tried to steal the gun.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
You're so full of shit, you stupid bitch.
You are right on one aspect that is that the left are trying to lynch Zimmerman; just because it FEELS good.

You have zero doubt; because that's the only thought your single surviving brain cell will allow you to have.

The rest of your diatribe is nothing more then you stirring shit and it's a fact that you enjoy the smell.

How do you know that they didn't do a drug test on Zimmerman and/or a background check?
Show your proof bitch.
Click to expand...

wow, i can't believe I missed that total darla meltdown. damn having to work all the time. well, i'll just let her mental ravings speak for themselves.
 
Darla said:
Why would you have to prove that? Is the stand your ground law only applicable between two armed people, or one armed and one unarmed persons?

No, it is not.

You'd only have to prove Martin felt reasonable danger. And in fact, his phone call with his gf proves that. Further, when they get finished proving that is Martin's voice screaming for help ( so far they have only had samples of Zimmerman's voice to compare it to and it ain't him, and you don't accept that, but more and more experts will be brought in, it ain't him screaming), then that will prove it beyond all reasonable doubt.
Click to expand...

Yep; that's the first think kids should be taught.
When you're in trouble, call your gf. :palm:
 
Darla said:
Damo, we're not on the jury.

It doesn't bother you that people like USF have reached the conclusion that Martin was a "thug" and Zimmerman is innocent though? You'd want them judging the guy who killed someone you cared for right?

Me, I'd recuse myself. I could not be objective. But I'd admit that. How many of those calling Martin a "thug" do you think would do the same? About zero.
Click to expand...

IF you had bothered to read more, you stupid bitch, you would have seen that I said I was posting my comments in a "tit for tat" for what was being speculated about Zimmerman.
But then; seeing as how you lie about everything "big and small", the chances of you ever being logical is slim to none.
 
Darla said:
I haven't pretended anything. I have not even commented directly on this NBC thing. I consider it a distraction but only for people who want to be distracted.

A 17 yo kid was murdered walking back to his dad's place to watch a sports game. He went out to get a snack. I don't give a shit about this other stuff.
Click to expand...

You mean "other stuff" like the truth or the facts.
It's obvious that you don't give a shit about those things.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
there's this thing we have called an inalienable right to self preservation. we also have this thing called the 5th Amendment. there are other rights as well, but you sound like you'd be happier suspending all of those rights in cases of crimes that involve black victims.
Click to expand...

You're not getting what I'm saying. We have one man's word for what happened that night. Do you really think GZ would say "oops, I screwed up" if indeed that's what happened? A child was killed. The investigation was botched. No witness saw or heard the entire sequence of events. I say bring everything into the light of day before deciding that GZ was justified in his actions. I should think he'd want that for his own sake, if everything was as cut-and-dried as you seem to believe.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
thanks. I can only go off of the example that you and other liberals provide on here, that if one doesn't say anything against an issue, they are obviously for it.
Click to expand...

You need to rethink that. Many times I don't post on a topic, such as global warming, simply because I don't give a crap about it.
 
Cynic said:
again, my side is supported by hundreds of years of precedence. yours is not. when details are murky, or there is reasonable doubt, and you dont have falsifiable evidence, our justice system defaults to not guilty. If there is not sufficient enough evidence, you default to not even charging someone. And our society has a moral imperative to do so.
Click to expand...

Maybe Darla should be charged with prostitution.
I mean we have enough posts that show certain behavior(s).
Then she can wait in jail, until the Courts find her innocent.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
wow, i can't believe I missed that total darla meltdown. damn having to work all the time. well, i'll just let her mental ravings speak for themselves.
Click to expand...

You haven't seen anything yet.
If Zimmerman is not charged or charged and then found not guilty, you're in for a treat.
Not only will she go on another meltdown; but she'll then begin to defend all of her earlier accustions against Zimmerman.
 
Superfreak said:
I don't disagree with you, I think that in this case they thought they had more than they did and that is why they went national with it.
Click to expand...

Well I guess that's where we kind of disagree, because I don't think it mattered. They thought they had a story and guess what... they had a fucking story... still having it! It's consumed the media for what now, a month? And we're not done, oh no... we haven't even really got started yet! There has to be "justice" here, you know that! The media won't let it go until there is, and that could take a while. In the meantime, we are coming up on a major national election! The economy is still in the shitter, I don't give a damn what kind of rosy pictures they paint, unemployment is still through the roof, not a damn thing, as far as I know, is being done about the gas prices and oil supply, that has just been totally forgotten about, while we all focus on this one tragedy in Florida.

Make no mistake, this 'story' became the focus of the media by design. And there will be MORE to come! I'm figuring the next 'story' will be some hapless red state father who supposedly 'killed his daughter cuz she got an abortion' or something along those lines, they HAVE to stir shit between social conservatives and libertarian conservatives, it's crucial! The thing you have to understand is, this is being done to distract us, to pacify us for now... we're all interested in what is happening with this case, and it's really nothing extraordinary or worthy of the time the media is devoting to it, but gullible people are sucked in and want more, and the networks oblige, with a sly grin on their face, I am sure.
 
christiefan915 said:
You're not getting what I'm saying. We have one man's word for what happened that night. Do you really think GZ would say "oops, I screwed up" if indeed that's what happened? A child was killed. The investigation was botched. No witness saw or heard the entire sequence of events. I say bring everything into the light of day before deciding that GZ was justified in his actions. I should think he'd want that for his own sake, if everything was as cut-and-dried as you seem to believe.
Click to expand...
bring everything in to the light of day, how? a trial?
 
Well, he's going to be charged boys, so you may commence your weeping now. If you believe the prosecutor dismissed the grand jury and thus any political cover for herself, in the most widely watched racial murder in years, you may be an idiot.

She's decided to bring charges. Second degree or manslaughter.

Get the popcorn because when you can no longer shoot a black youth in this country without facing charges, the white boys freak out. :)
 
SmarterThanYou said:
a trial is about determining guilt of innocence AFTER all evidence has been assembled and processed for a determination. otherwise it's called an inquisition.
Click to expand...

Yeah that's what they refused to do right after the murder. Which you have no problem with.

That's what the new prosecutor is doing now. Which you do have a problem with. But that's too bad.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
You haven't seen anything yet.
If Zimmerman is not charged or charged and then found not guilty, you're in for a treat.
Not only will she go on another meltdown; but she'll then begin to defend all of her earlier accustions against Zimmerman.
Click to expand...

Yeah I melted down. You have no idea how much I enjoyed your string of foaming, spitting, vulgar posts.

I know where it's all coming from. I smiled and I smiled. Thanks. :)
 
Cynic said:
in that case, you must agree that he is found not guilty, as there is no compelling evidence that he should be convicted.
Click to expand...

It's interesting how you guys keep stomping your feet and insisting "there's no evidence!" "There's no Evidence!!"

Really? How do you know that? There was no damned investigation. How can there be evidence when there was no damned investigation and why do you not have a problem with there being no investigation?

Now, there is an investigation. Yet you are still stamping your feet and yelling "There's no evidence!!". No, what you mean is, you don't want there to be any evidence. At this time, we don't know exactly what evidence exists. The cops didn't investigate. But why didn't they? Is it because cops suck? Maybe, but the lead detective did NOT believe Zimmerman's story (and gosh wouldn't you know it I guess his terrible injuries that Damo saw the EMT guy examine just didn't impress the lead detective imagine that?) and wanted to charge him. The prosecutor's office said no.

Why did the prosecutor's office say no? Because "there's no evidence!"? HOw did they know that when they didn't investigate? Did someone pull strings? Zimmerman's white father was a judge of some sort. Did he know someone in the prosecutor's office, a buddy? These are all things that are being investigated.

There's no evidence? We'll see. Cause he's getting charged. There's an eyewitness who says he saw Martin on top of Zimmerman beating him. Is there really? Yet, there is another eyewitness who saw the altercation but couldn't tell who was on top. HE says the cops tried to get him to say Zimmerman in the red jacket was on top. But he refused. I wonder what a prosecutor will do with a witness who was coached by the cops on the stand? Or, has already done with that "witness".

The EMT guy "examined" Zimmerman's "injury"? Did he really? Well, where I come from if you are even remotely injured they pack your ass off to the hospital, period. No objections permitted. Looked to me on that tape as if the EMT guy looked at Zimmerman's head after Zimmerman claimed an injury. Do we know what he found? No, but the prosecutor will.

Voice experts say it's not Zimmerman screaming on the tape, but they can't match it to Martin because they don't have a sample of his voice. Gosh, do you think that in this day and age, there is any possibility his parents may have his voice on tape? Wonder what will happen when they turn that over and there's a match. Or what has already happened.

All of this and more is what we should be waiting to see, but instead righties are stamping their feet "THERE'S NO EVIDENCE!! AND THAT IS THAT LIBS!".

Why? Well, reasons differ but in some cases it's as simple as this; a black kid was murdered, no one was charged, and this upset liberals.

ANd this upset liberals...

And believe it or not, for modern conservatives, that's often enough.

For others it's authoritarianism - they get off on it. For still others it's gun nuttiness. Reasons vary. But the bottom line is, you don't want an investigation. But you got one. So that you can even pass for human beings, you really should say that you are waiting to see what that's uncovered.

Just some advice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top