Is the alleged GOP's war on women a false liberal boogeyman?
- Thread starter Cancel 2018. 3
- Start date
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
unless of course, you want to kill it.....then it's okay to lay your morals and the other person's body on the line......
zappasguitar
Well-known member
There's Yurt, ignoring the bolded portion of the OP that stated very clearly that the GOP in charge of the hearing wouldn't allow women to testify...
I, of course, reminded the Yurtard of that very fact...
Darla then points out to the Yurtard that he can find info about the self same hearings by just googling the info...
Yurt then proceeds to ignore her comment about google, so he can continue to play the clueless rube and pretend we haven't supplied him with any facts.
At which time I once again highlight the quote from the OP about how the chariman of the hearings refused to allow any women to testify....to which Yurt responded by running away, proving once again he absolutely will not admit when he is wrong.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
you still have not proven your claim. it wasn't about not allowing women to testify. did you read your own link and not just the opinionated portion? i bet you only read the opinion portion and ignored the facts because they don't conform to your twisted world view.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
And now that he's cornered and can't find any way to escape, the bullshit semantic word games start...why can't you just be honest for once?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
what is bullshit and what semantics am i arguing? you claimed the GOP denied women the ability to testify....the link you gave had only one person and the issue wasn't that she was a woman, rather, it was about qualifications and your link listed only one person who had an issue with her.
conclusion: your claim is without merit.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Were any women allowed to testify?
The short answer is no.
You can play your bullshit semantic word games and quibble about things that don't matter, like the number of women mentioned in the article or what their qualifications are.
The fact is, Democrats had a witness they wished to question, and the GOP Chairman of the hearing REFUSED her the opportunity to testify.
Numerous men were allowed to testify, despite the fact that nearly every type of contraceptive device is designed for and are used by WOMEN...
To recap...the GOP Chairman of the hearing allowed numerous men to testify but refused to let any women testify despite the fact that almost all contraceptive devices are designed for and used by women.
Despite these facts being obvious to anyone with Google, Yurt still refuses to admit I have proven my claim that no women were allowed to testify during the hearings.
christiefan915
Catalyst
You're 100% repub and dishonest about it, to boot.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
were any other women denied the ability to testify? there is no semantics here at all. you claim it was because she is a woman and no women were allowed to testify. that is false. if you had other women all denied the ability to testify, you would have a point. all you have is a left wing site that claims they didn't allow women to testify. if you want to talk about semantics, your claim is plural, women, but the truth is it is only about this one woman. once again, your claim of "women" is absolutely untrue.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Just as predicted, and right on cue...more bullshit semantic word games from the Yurtard.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
what did i say that is bullshit? were there multiple women or just this one woman zappa?
There is no war on women. Not unless you're a female Conservative. They're constantly under attack. The real war, however, is taking place in abortion clinics; where mindless atrocities take place on a regular basis.
poet
Banned
This, and you want to know why liberals are "pro-abortion". You're waging a personal war on women, by sticking your nose where it doesn't belong. Worry about your own body and its' contents. Who are you to judge anyone? Jesus said that judgment was the Lord's. Are you the Lord? If not, what the fuck are you doing?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
you have judged me, repeatedly poet.
further, the issue is not just about women....it is about the child. how can you ignore that?
poet
Banned
Well, if your mother had had any common sense, she would have aborted your Quasimodo ass...just look at what you've become....her spitting image.
Keep fucking.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
What matters is what you keep ignoring.
Yes or No.
Did the GOP Chairman refuse to allow any women...including a woman whom the Democrats wished to question, to take the stand during the hearings?
Why do you advocate murder, poet? You're already saddled with racism. How much more can your stunted conscience take?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
answer my question zappa.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
you are truly a sick and twisted individual.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
I asked you first...but I knew you wouldn't answer...to do so would be to admit you were wrong...and it's been proven too many times to count that you will not admit when you are wrong.
No sweat...