Say her name

ExpressLane said:
No I don't know that. Do you have a link that proves it?

So you object to a Black officer shooting an unarmed white woman?

Also the Washington Post says there were 14 police killings of unarmed Blacks in 2018. That is unfortunate but considering the number of police interactions with Black criminals every year 14 is a pretty low number.

In fact more officers are killed by criminals than are unarmed suspect that are killed by police.
73 officers in 2021, 61 officers in 2022, and 60 officers in 2023
Click to expand...
Your first sentence says it all.

As to your 2nd sentence: www.vox.com/2014/8/21/6053811/white-on-white-murder

And I've previously addressed the sheer idiotic propaganda about Jan. 6th and that fool that got herself killed. https://www.justplainpolitics.com/threads/say-her-name.224434/post-6231643

And your Post article is a bit myopic: www.theroot.com/here-s-how-many-people-police-killed-in-2018-1831469528

Your last paragraph is a flawed comparison, as police being killed in the line of duty is NOT the same as police killing unarmed civilians. One is a cop confronting armed, violent criminals, the other is a cop shooting an unarmed person who is only perceived as a threat or is in non-compliance. Also roughly 22 unarmed black men have been killed yearly by cops since 2015 www.npr.org/2021/01/25/956177021/fatal-police-shootings-of-unarmed-black-people-reveal-troubling-patterns

So the bottom line: you ignore the Harvard study and just throw in some half assed/myopic googling and the usual smoke blowing.

I'll pick this up another time, as you will no doubt just keep doing the same dance.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Your first sentence says it all.

As to your 2nd sentence: www.vox.com/2014/8/21/6053811/white-on-white-murder

And I've previously addressed the sheer idiotic propaganda about Jan. 6th and that fool that got herself killed. https://www.justplainpolitics.com/threads/say-her-name.224434/post-6231643

And your Post article is a bit myopic: www.theroot.com/here-s-how-many-people-police-killed-in-2018-1831469528

Your last paragraph is a flawed comparison, as police being killed in the line of duty is NOT the same as police killing unarmed civilians. One is a cop confronting armed, violent criminals, the other is a cop shooting an unarmed person who is only perceived as a threat or is in non-compliance. Also roughly 22 unarmed black men have been killed yearly by cops since 2015 www.npr.org/2021/01/25/956177021/fatal-police-shootings-of-unarmed-black-people-reveal-troubling-patterns

So the bottom line: you ignore the Harvard study and just throw in some half assed/myopic googling and the usual smoke blowing.

I'll pick this up another time, as you will no doubt just keep doing the same dance.
Click to expand...

Seems that was what Ashley was doing, no Mr. Never Wrong?
 
Taichiliberal said:
Say THEIR NAMES, YOU MAGA POS!

Taichiliberal

Post in thread 'Say her name'

I would take your MAGA jackass braying seriously if you gave the same mournful empathy and righteous indignation for all the innocent black folk killed by police, or all those people slaughtered in mass shootings by nutjobs with easy access to an AR-15 style weapon that was formerly banned. Or the women who DIED UNNECESSARILY because of a christo-fascist agenda regarding abortion procedures.

No, POS like you ONLY cry crocodile tears when it fits into your reprehensible agenda. Otherwise, you don't give a damn about your fellow man.

You disgust me. :censor:
  • Love
Click to expand...
Why so angry sugar?
 
Taichiliberal said:
As the chronology of the posts shows YOUR BRETHREN MADE A STATEMENT THAT DOESN'T HOLD UP TO FACT BASED SCRUTINY AND LOGIC. But rather than just acknowledge that the MAGA/Alt-Right reprehensible flock devolve into smoke blowing.....asking "questions" that even they cannot provide fact based answers to, and then injecting personal supposition and conjecture into the conversation, along with assertions that they cannot provide facts to back up.

P.S. - since it's PROVEN that black folk are 3 times likely to be killed by police, and in the last 30 years we've seen a rash of UNARMED INNOCENT BLACK FOLK being killed by the police, I would like YOU to tell us what is an "acceptable" number for ANY citizen or group of innocent citizens to be killed by the police. We'll wait.
Click to expand...

Prove there has been a rash of UNARMED INNOCENT BLACK FOLK being killed by the police

The Ultra Conservative <sarcasm> Washington Post says 14 Black unarmed suspects were killed by the police. 61.5 million people had at least one police interaction in 2018. That is a pretty low percentage of fatal shootings of unarmed Blacks per police interaction.



It is unfortunate that any ever gets killed by police . But if you resist arrest and start a violent struggle you become a threat to the police. If you overcome a policeman or woman you can turn their weapon on them. So some of these 14 people were probably struggling with the police. And then we have the occasional accidental shooting like the female police officer that shot a fleeing driver instead of tasing him. The bottom line is if you act violently with police you may police will act violently with you. That increases the chance you may get killed. Blacks have a proven history of being more violent than whites.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Your first sentence says it all.

As to your 2nd sentence: www.vox.com/2014/8/21/6053811/white-on-white-murder
Click to expand...

Vox is not a credible source. Use FBI data. Or a reliable source.
Taichiliberal said:
And I've previously addressed the sheer idiotic propaganda about Jan. 6th and that fool that got herself killed. https://www.justplainpolitics.com/threads/say-her-name.224434/post-6231643
Click to expand...
So you would have been OK with police shooting down unarmed BLM rioters. Good to know you are consistent. <sarcasm>
Taichiliberal said:
And your Post article is a bit myopic: www.theroot.com/here-s-how-many-people-police-killed-in-2018-1831469528
Click to expand...
I'm starting to see your problem. The Root is another unreliable source. Us FBI data o some other RELIABLE source.
http://www.theroot.com/here-s-how-many-people-police-killed-in-2018-1831469528
Taichiliberal said:
Your last paragraph is a flawed comparison, as police being killed in the line of duty is NOT the same as police killing unarmed civilians. One is a cop confronting armed, violent criminals, the other is a cop shooting an unarmed person who is only perceived as a threat or is in non-compliance. Also roughly 22 unarmed black men have been killed yearly by cops since 2015 www.npr.org/2021/01/25/956177021/fatal-police-shootings-of-unarmed-black-people-reveal-troubling-patterns
Click to expand...
And how many of those 22 unarmed black men made the poor life choice to physically attack an armed police officer? Officers cannot afford to be attacked and overcome by a suspect. 12% of all police officers killed were killed by their own guns. So police shootings of unarmed suspects does not tell the full story.
http://www.npr.org/2021/01/25/95617...narmed-black-people-reveal-troubling-patterns
Taichiliberal said:
So the bottom line: you ignore the Harvard study and just throw in some half assed/myopic googling and the usual smoke blowing.

I'll pick this up another time, as you will no doubt just keep doing the same dance.
Click to expand...
Yeah leave when you are on the wrong side of the argument and you are getting your ass handed to you.
 
Lionfish said:
She was killed by an illegal that was flown to NYC and decided he didn't like it there so he requested be flown to GA which brandond govt did.
She fought off her attacker but was beaten to death with a rock.
Her death lies in the hands of joe biden and that smug little prick Mayorkis.
Click to expand...
The only reason someone would oppose limits on illegal immigration is they want to destroy America.
 
The Trump Administration said:
Is there anything a leftist won't embrace or countenance in their lust for absolute power?
Click to expand...
I honestly believe if leftists thought killing their own grandmother's would have gotten rid of trump they would have done it in a heart beat. My proof? They disown family members who voted for trump. Killing them to get rid of trump would be an easy decision.
 
ExpressLane said:
Vox is not a credible source. Use FBI data. Or a reliable source.

So you would have been OK with police shooting down unarmed BLM rioters. Good to know you are consistent. <sarcasm>

I'm starting to see your problem. The Root is another unreliable source. Us FBI data o some other RELIABLE source.
http://www.theroot.com/here-s-how-many-people-police-killed-in-2018-1831469528

And how many of those 22 unarmed black men made the poor life choice to physically attack an armed police officer? Officers cannot afford to be attacked and overcome by a suspect. 12% of all police officers killed were killed by their own guns. So police shootings of unarmed suspects does not tell the full story.
http://www.npr.org/2021/01/25/95617...narmed-black-people-reveal-troubling-patterns

Yeah leave when you are on the wrong side of the argument and you are getting your ass handed to you.
Click to expand...
1. Once again you display your proud, willful ignorance. If you were in the habit of READING CAREFULLY AND COMPREHENSIVELY, you would have noted various underlining throughout the article. Put your mouse on them, they will highlight. Click on them, and you get the valid documentation you seek (or are scared to acknowledge).

2. Pity you didn't learn in school that repeating something won't magically make it true. The chronology of the posts clearly shows links to valid documentation that deconstructs your mantra for the mischaracterization that it is.

3. See #1.

4. Once again, you display the insipidly stubborn intellectual dishonesty of all MAGA mooks when confronted with facts that don't fit your narrative. 22 UNARMED black folk each year since 2015. You previously pushed a narrative that didn't acknowledge such. Once again, you try to inject your absurd "what if's" scenarios that don't exist in the evidence given in the VOX article, which was supported by FBI/DOJ facts. Then you throw in (yet again) an unsubstantiated percentage with your usual bogus conclusion in an attempt to disprove the FACTS I laid out that you can't disprove or debunk.

5. I assume you typed that while looking in the mirror. It's called projection on your part. Carry on.
 
The chronology of the posts...
The chronology of the posts...
The chronology of the posts...
Fucking twit...
 
ExpressLane said:
Prove there has been a rash of UNARMED INNOCENT BLACK FOLK being killed by the police

The Ultra Conservative <sarcasm> Washington Post says 14 Black unarmed suspects were killed by the police. 61.5 million people had at least one police interaction in 2018. That is a pretty low percentage of fatal shootings of unarmed Blacks per police interaction.



It is unfortunate that any ever gets killed by police . But if you resist arrest and start a violent struggle you become a threat to the police. If you overcome a policeman or woman you can turn their weapon on them. So some of these 14 people were probably struggling with the police. And then we have the occasional accidental shooting like the female police officer that shot a fleeing driver instead of tasing him. The bottom line is if you act violently with police you may police will act violently with you. That increases the chance you may get killed. Blacks have a proven history of being more violent than whites.
Click to expand...
Taichiliberal

Post in thread 'Say her name'

ExpressLane said:
No I don't know that. Do you have a link that proves it?

So you object to a Black officer shooting an unarmed white woman?

Also the Washington Post says there were 14 police killings of unarmed Blacks in 2018. That is unfortunate but considering the number of police interactions with Black criminals every year 14 is a pretty low number.

In fact more officers are killed by criminals than are unarmed suspect that are killed by police.
73 officers in 2021, 61 officers in 2022, and 60 officers in 2023
Click to expand...
Your first sentence says it all.

As to your 2nd sentence...
  • Like
  • Haha

Taichiliberal

Post in thread 'Say her name'

ExpressLane said:
Vox is not a credible source. Use FBI data. Or a reliable source.

So you would have been OK with police shooting down unarmed BLM rioters. Good to know you are consistent. <sarcasm>

I'm starting to see your problem. The Root is another unreliable source. Us FBI data o some other RELIABLE source.
http://www.theroot.com/here-s-how-many-people-police-killed-in-2018-1831469528

And how many of those 22 unarmed black men made the poor life choice to physically attack an armed police officer? Officers cannot afford to be attacked and overcome by a suspect. 12% of all...
Click to expand...
  • Like
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top