So ChatGPT is a contradictory source, in any event?
Guess who's banned from that thread
You are blustering.
I gave you that opportunity. You never explained how abortion is somehow not a contract killing.
... of living humans
In contract killings, the customer putting out the hit on a mark always assigns greater importance to his own convenience than he does to the life of the mark, and the contracted killer agrees.
That's what an abortion is when there's a heartbeat, which there is around the three-week point. Abortion is the killing of a living human in the womb by a paid professional killer.
Most of us are averse to eating human.
I am not seeing it. "The irony" and a laugh emoji is "insulting"? What was that in reply to? Again, I don't see his posts as he is on ignore.Thanks for responding. The topic of your first interaction with IBD had come up. I imagined that, like IBD, you go by something of a "I don't strike first, but I do retaliate" motto. IBD disagreed. Here's what he said:
**
You would be greatly mistaken. Her first words to me were insults, along with others with whom she intended to gang-fling poo.
**
I was skeptical, but I -have- seen some posters go straight for the jugular with some newbies that looked innocent to me, so I couldn't rule it out. It's just that you don't seem the type.
Update: I decided to see if I could see first hand what your first interaction with IBDaMann was. Looks like it was this post:
I mean, I think it was a tad insulting, but rather tame by the standards of this place.
IBDaMann = Into the Night = gfm7175 = Sybil, a schizophrenic. I suspect he's also Uncensored2008Thanks for responding. The topic of your first interaction with IBD had come up. I imagined that, like IBD, you go by something of a "I don't strike first, but I do retaliate" motto. IBD disagreed. Here's what he said:
**
You would be greatly mistaken. Her first words to me were insults, along with others with whom she intended to gang-fling poo.
**
I was skeptical, but I -have- seen some posters go straight for the jugular with some newbies that looked innocent to me, so I couldn't rule it out. It's just that you don't seem the type.
Update: I decided to see if I could see first hand what your first interaction with IBDaMann was. Looks like it was this post:
I mean, I think it was a tad insulting, but rather tame by the standards of this place.
Then why waste your time with me, Scott?
www.statnews.com
Awesome. Thanks.There's a lot of problems with peer review in journals. An article on the subject:
Scientists’ suit against top academic publishers lays bare deep frustration over unpaid peer review
Researchers have sued six big academic publishers, arguing their practices are illegal and anticompetitive.
I personally favour pre prints, where anyone can see and review what researchers are doing. Even there, however, some good papers have been retracted due to what I imagine was Big Pharma pressure.
We should -always- check the facts. Getting published in a peer reviewed journal doesn't mean the facts are right, especially when dealing with subjects where Big Pharma and its lackeys in government have a lot of power. RFK Jr. wrote a good book on Fauci's role in this mess:
Amazon.com: The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health (Children’s Health Defense) eBook : Kennedy Jr., Robert F.: Kindle Store
The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health (Children’s Health Defense) - Kindle edition by Kennedy Jr., Robert F.. Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Use features like bookmarks, note taking and...www.amazon.com
