Its fascinating watching media and Democrat handwringing when Trump asks his DOJ to investigate Democrats in the Epstein matter

Truth Detector said:
200.webp
Click to expand...
YES YOU ARE AN ASSHOLE .
I am pretty sure most people on here would agree with ME that IF Trump's name is in those papers he SHOULD be investigated JUST like everybody else that has their name in them, And he should be put on trial and IF found guilty he should be put in jail for LIFE.
What seems to be your problem with that?
What if Trump is investigated and arrested you won't be able to suck his cock any more, is that your problem ? Or is it you won't be able to take it up the ass from him for awhile?
 
ZenMode said:
So, anyway, Trump called for an investigation so the files can't be released.
Click to expand...
So, when they are all released and you realize there is no there, will you be embarrassed? I don't think you have the intelligence or honesty to be embarrassed. Every day you work overtime to prove what a brainless, gullible uninformed dumbass you are.
 
Tbird19482 said:
YES YOU ARE I AM AN ASSHOLE .
Click to expand...

That's obvious. You're also mentally unstable and should be kept in a padded cell under observation. ;)

Tbird19482 said:
I am pretty sure most people on here would agree with ME that IF Trump's name is in those papers he SHOULD be investigated JUST like everybody else that has their name in them, And he should be put on trial and IF found guilty he should be put in jail for LIFE.
Click to expand...

Only lying, dishonest halfwits that voted for Kamala are with you dumbass. :laugh:

Tbird19482 said:
What seems to be your problem with that?
Click to expand...

I have absolutely no problem releasing everything. Why would you assume otherwise mental case?

Tbird19482 said:
What if Trump is investigated and arrested you won't be able to suck his cock any more, is that your problem ? Or is it you won't be able to take it up the ass from him for awhile?
Click to expand...

Typical childish drivel from a brainless low IQ leftist who swills DNC MSNBC Kool-Aid.

I do wish you had an IQ above room temp. :palm:
 
Truth Detector said:
So, when they are all released and you realize there is no there, will you be embarrassed? I don't think you have the intelligence or honesty to be embarrassed. Every day you work overtime to prove what a brainless, gullible uninformed dumbass you are.
Click to expand...
Why would I be embarrassed? I've never taken a strong position either way. I mean, Trump has admitted to, and been convicted of, sexually assaulting adults, but nothing related to children.
 
Yes. In May 2023, a New York jury found Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing writer E. Jean Carroll and defaming her, awarding her $5 million in damages. Additional Case: In January 2024, a separate jury awarded Carroll $83.3 million in damages for defamation related to Trump’s continued public denials.
www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2025/11/11/Trump-SCOTUS-E-Jean-Carroll/9721762850570/
www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/trump-appeals-supreme-court-e-jean-carroll-judgement-sexual-abuse-rcna243124
 
Jake Starkey said:
Yes. In May 2023, a New York jury found Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing writer E. Jean Carroll and defaming her, awarding her $5 million in damages. Additional Case: In January 2024, a separate jury awarded Carroll $83.3 million in damages for defamation related to Trump’s continued public denials.
www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2025/11/11/Trump-SCOTUS-E-Jean-Carroll/9721762850570/
www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/trump-appeals-supreme-court-e-jean-carroll-judgement-sexual-abuse-rcna243124
Click to expand...
The court was wrong. Fadcinating hgow they could find Trump guilty when the accuser could not remember the exact date of the assault, the exact time of the assault and, even though it was in a very haughty busy departments store, find a single witness to the assault.

So, we are left to believe that Trump went shopping all by himself, dragged Jean Carrol into a dressing room without anyone hearing, seeing or noticing and assaulted her.

Afterwards, we are told to believe that Jean Carol was just too traumatized to say anything or contact the police and file a report.

Even someone with half a brain would find that a head scratcher. Not you, you have less than that. :palm:

This too will get overturned. It was a corrupt judge in a corrupt jurisdiction making a corrupt decision.
 
Truth Detector said:
Let's take a walk down memory lane when Democrats tried to jail their political opponents and their media enablers were more than happy to carry their water.

How Democrats tried to jail Trump before the election​

President Trump has filed a lengthy appeal of his campaign finance conviction, which was an over-the-top case brought by Democrats after President Biden demanded that Mr. Trump be destroyed as a 2024 candidate.

“This case should never have seen the inside of a courtroom, let alone resulted in a conviction,” states the Oct. 27 appeal from six lawyers at the firm Sullivan & Cromwell.

As Democrats today complain about Mr. Trump’s payback indictments, look at the cast of characters assembled in Manhattan to operate Mr. Biden’s political wrecking ball.
  • District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who brought the indictment. His election campaign was financed by Republican hater and socialist George Soros.
  • Trial judge and acting New York Supreme Court Justice Juan M. Merchan, who donated to Mr. Trump’s political opponents. (Mr. Merchan’s daughter’s digital advertising firm, Authentic Campaigns Inc., received $14.7 million in payments in 2023-2024 from Adam B. Schiff’s Senate campaign. Mr. Schiff raised millions of dollars by citing the Bragg/Merchan criminal case ongoing in those two years.)
  • Mark Pomerantz, a former assistant New York district attorney who dedicated his life to indicting Mr. Trump. After the district attorney’s office sifted through and rejected various scenarios, he wrote a how-to book for partisans such as Mr. Bragg to follow.
  • Finally, a jury in Democratic-infused Manhattan whose members would gladly convict Mr. Trump for chewing gum too loudly.
In Washington, there were two more players. One was Mr. Biden, then eyeing a reelection campaign. He said on Nov. 9, 2022, when asked by a reporter about Mr. Trump, “We just have to demonstrate that he will not take power if he does run. I’m making sure he, under legitimate efforts of our Constitution, does not become the next president again.”


A few weeks later, Matthew Colangelo, the No. 3 official in Mr. Biden’s Justice Department, quit and parachuted into Mr. Bragg’s office. Mission: Prosecute Donald Trump. Within four months, they figured out how to bring convoluted criminal charges that the predecessor district attorney had rejected.

Mr. Bragg announced an indictment on 34 felony counts over a purported nondisclosure agreement between Mr. Trump and adult film actress Stormy Daniels, who alleged a 2006 sexual encounter.

Violent people can run wild in Mr. Bragg’s jurisdiction, but Mr. Biden had a higher priority: to get Mr. Trump. A jury complied in May 2024. Guilty on all counts.

Attorneys filed Mr. Trump’s appeal with the Democratic-rich New York Supreme Court Appellate Division. They took apart a rickety case brought by Mr. Bragg and nurtured by Judge Merchan.

The two took a misdemeanor — altering business records — as the weapon to nail Mr. Trump, but they had a problem. The two-year statute of limitations had expired. So they packaged 34 supposed misdemeanors and turned them into felonies by layering various offshoot crimes. One, for example, was a violation of federal campaign finance laws. However, Congress stipulated that such laws expressly prohibit states from prosecuting violations of federal election law.

Judge Merchan told jurors they didn’t even have to be unanimous in choosing which supposed crime to attach.

“Despite years of rifling through President Trump’s business, [the district attorney’s office] could not find a felony charge,” the Trump appeal reads. “So it concocted an elaborate theory that has never before been pursued in this State and is plainly preempted by federal law.”

Judge Merchan also allowed evidence of Mr. Trump’s official acts, a legal tactic the Supreme Court subsequently outlawed. The judge, tainted by conflicts of interest, also refused defense demands to step aside.

Mr. Trump has said the $130,000 he sent his attorney, Michael Cohen, as he assumed the presidency in 2017, was for legal fees, not a nondisclosure agreement. Mr. Cohen subsequently turned on Mr. Trump and became the Democrats’ favorite witness to doom the president.

“The only direct evidence that President Trump was contemporaneously aware of Cohen’s dealings with [Stormy Daniels] … is the word of one man: Michael Cohen,” the appeal states. “But Cohen is a serial perjurer and convicted fraudster who had previously told even his own attorneys that President Trump had no such contemporaneous knowledge.”

Watching the case closely in Washington was the Republican-led House Judiciary Committee. The Republican staff issued a report months after the conviction.

It chronicled Judge Merchan’s series of anti-Trump rulings, such as placing a gag order on the then-announced presidential candidate and blocking a Federal Election Commission chairman from testifying. The committee summed up the legal tragedy: “Mark Pomerantz later authored a tell-all book in which he took Bragg to task for failing to prosecute President Trump. Unsurprisingly, just months after Pomerantz’s book premiered — and after President Trump declared his candidacy for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination — Bragg succumbed to this political pressure and filed charges relying on Pomerantz’s theory of the case.”

In the end, Mr. Trump, the most resilient of resilient men, won. He defeated Vice President Kamala Harris.

Judge Merchan convened a court session on Jan. 10 and sentenced the president-elect to “unconditional discharge.” A free man.

“President Trump never had a real shot at a fair trial in Manhattan,” the House committee said. “In a more neutral jurisdiction, where a politically ambitious prosecutor was not motivated by partisanship and a trial judge with perceived biases did not refuse to enforce a fair proceeding, President Trump would have never been found guilty.”

Click to expand...
So you mean to tell me all this resistence, all this trying to block the release of the Epstink files by Trump and his peeps, WAS TO PROTECT DEMOCRATS FROM BEING EXPOSED? Fact: The entire 4 years of the Biden administration, not one single word about the Epstink files made headlines and commentary like it's doing with Trump....AND ITS BECAUSE TRUMP TRYING TO RALLY UP HIS BASE DURING THE ELECTIONS, IT WAS THIS STUPID MOTHERFUCKER THAT KEPT BRINGING UP THE EPSINK FILES, NOT THE DEMS, NOT HARRIS, BUT DONALD JUDAS TRUMP. And if its only liberals indicated in the release, EVERY SINGLE AMERICAN WITH A FUCKIN BRAIN CELL, IS GONNA KNOW BONDI WITH THE SUPPORT OF TRUMP, WHITE WASHED THEM FILES TO SUIT THE DESIRES OF CONSERVATIVES AND MAGA.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top