Monad Portal
Was it me?
policy matters tho.
Democrats plan to force trump to testify under oath.
- Thread starter Crepitus
- Start date
serenity
Verified User
why? why is not staying on message considered insubordination, treason, or blasphemy against any social consensus of typecast people serving humanity 24/7?
All reality does is direct ancestors to perform as stereotyped by rule of law defending every economic theory used within this species globally here daily.
Couple of years ago I googled how my major po;liticla parties and religions were performed by this one species with 5 basice ancestral lineages limite dto 5 current generaitongaps alive each rotaiton forward so far.
What I got was 21 major religions and 1,043 political parties that defend concepts of God and country within the whole population equally evolving at the same time each rotation here now.
Break that down intellectually ideologies among 8.3 billion ancestors as of 2025 existing since concieved inhabitng time ech rotationfot he planet in series parallel proportion of black, brown, yellow, red, causasian ancestral lineages with 5 generationgaps of ancestors numbering betwen 16 great great grandparents, 8 great grandparents, 4 grandparents, 2 parenting each great great grandchild replacing their previous 4 generaitons lived since inception of homos sapiens ihabiting space daily here since dawn of recorded history of human behavior so far.
Disprove my accountability with theories and theologies suggesting genetics cannot be the only path life has taken here now for everything socially happening tomorrows midnight to noon contextual time dawn to dusk each rotation forward.
Democrats aren't the only corrupted people alive.
Monad Portal
Was it me?
true populism is not contained in any popular messaging stack,
hence it must be truth.
this is your own logic.
I know- but I had to use what they gave me
serenity
Verified User
I am accounting for genetic evolving not contextual societal evolution practiced last 7,000 years within one species of the active food chain native to this universal location.
That self evident point between actual evolving and factual evolution theory or creation mythology or theology while biology works the same way all the time..
Haha haha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Yes, let's joke some more about survivors of Epstein's traficking ring some more. Let's joke some more about trump and his thug crew desperately trying to cover for trump!
Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo funy... hahahahahahah
My point was, Presidents do sometimes testify under oath.
Of course, we can pretend that I was being grossly off topic considering what the topic was, or we can recognize the topic at hand and how what I said actually fits with the topic...
Also, yeah... Once you go off on some leftist for their jokes on the topic we'll believe you actually care about jokes on the topic.
Oh.. another funeeee.
Oh, so hilarious.
Oh.. let me catch my breath.
If your point was "presidents testify under oath" trump wouldn't. trump demanded Muller's questions be submitted in writing then just said "do not recall" on the hard questions.
I'd love to see trump testify to a committee about his involvement not only with Epstein but with the obvious coverup for him being conducted by the thug/clowns in his administration.
Crepitus
Verified User
Ooops, I've hurt your feelings again, lol.Cry moar, bitch! Your tears are delicious!
Good! 2years, 10monthsThey've set the precedent by forcing the Clintons to do so, now it's open season. tRump and all the little tRumplings will be coming before congress in a few years.
Cooked their own goose.
After Republicans push Clintons to testify on Epstein, Democrats warn they'll haul in Trump
Democrats say Republicans have set a precedent with subpoenas of an ex-president and first lady. "We will follow it ... Donald Trump, all of his kids. Everybody," Rep. Maxwell Frost said.www.nbcnews.com
Just a reminder, it is the Government Oversight Committee doing this so called investigation. They are supposed to have oversight into the government, which does not include the Clintons, but does include trump.
You claim to hang out with the Aryan Brotherhood and to not even have a bachelor's degree.
Jim Crow Laws were in existence from about 1875 to 1965. The filibuster came into existence in 1806, was first used in 1837, and was changed to a 60% rule in 1975. The change to the current silent filibuster was gradual since 1975. None of those dates line up with the Jim Crow Laws.
I do?????? Show us all where I EVER posted that,...or even alluded to it. You cant because it is yet another of your insane lies you ridiculous never right imbecile. Like Dutch you seem to believe you can just SPEAK THINGS INTO EXISTENCE THAT NEVER HAPPENED for some reason. Post where I EVER said that or shut the fuck up you lying pig. Or go run and hide like you normally do when you cant back up your nonsense. In the end Walt YOU will have to back up your words and your nonsense,....in case you haven't noticed or have been living in a cave or under a building with stained mattresses in NY,... those days are just about here. All the lies in the world wont get you out of it either. Its ALWAYS the mouth, the lies, the scummyness that brings them down. tic tic tic.....
When the facts don't agree with Walt he just makes them up. He should work for the DNC because they do the same thing.
Yep....both he and Dunce,...er I mean DUTCH both do the exact same thing. Its sleazy. BTW......I just dropped the real deal in the great blizzard and how to drive in it thread. People should only listen to me on that subject,.....I'm the only one who knows wtf Im talking about anyway!
T bird......you don't need to thumbs down me for that post you know. You need to learn my personality. OBVIOUSLY I know that you know how to drive in those conditions. I am 62 and I am guessing you are older than I am and have more experience at it . When I put those little smileys at the end.......IT MEANS I AM JOKING! I joke A LOT,...I like humor,...maybe too much some times,...but life is too short to take everything so serious. No need to be offended,....like I say,...It was only joking when I said I was the only one worth listening to when I obviously know there are millions upon millions of people driving in it up here.Yep....both he and Dunce,...er I mean DUTCH both do the exact same thing. Its sleazy. BTW......I just dropped the real deal in the great blizzard and how to drive in it thread. People should only listen to me on that subject,.....I'm the only one who knows wtf Im talking about anyway!
Tbird19482
Verified User
Good advice on the driving stuff I just don't agree on the rest of it.
Have a nice day.
*sigh* There's nothing more ignorant than a democrat desperately trying to rewrite history.
End the Filibuster: How a Relic of Jim Crow Could Block Our Progressive Agenda | Demos
The filibuster is a racist remnant of a Senate designed to entrench white minority rule. It undermines organizing, participation, and electoral victories fueled by Black and Brown communities.
Upholding Jim Crow: Anti-Lynching and Anti-Poll Tax Bills
During the brief but transformative period of Reconstruction that followed the Civil War, Black Americans built unprecedented political power in state legislatures and Congress. Almost immediately, Southern senators turned their obstructionist sights to blocking Black Americans from exerting governing power. State lawmakers across the South created a set of violent voter intimidation and suppression schemes to keep Black men from exercising their fundamental right to vote—and Southern senators in Washington, D.C. used the filibuster to ensure Jim Crow endured as the law of the land in the South.For example, after Reconstruction, the filibuster was used for nearly 75 years to enshrine Jim Crow practices, particularly by blocking anti-lynching and anti-poll tax legislation. Jim Crow was nothing less than a legal and social means to intimidate, disenfranchise, and kill Black Americans with impunity, and lynchings and disenfranchisement of Black Americans were integral to that strategy.
The first anti-lynching bill in Congress was introduced in 1900 by Congressman George Henry White of North Carolina, then the country’s only Black member of Congress.16 In 1922, Congressman Leonidays Dyer of Missouri built on White’s leadership, presenting what could have been the first successful anti-lynching bill. Worked on and supported by the NAACP, the robust legislation called for fines upwards of $10,000 to the county where a lynching occurred, federal prosecution of the state and county officials who were negligent in seeking justice, as well as federal murder charges for participants in a lynching.17 In a 1921 public address in Birmingham, Alabama, Warren G. Harding became the first sitting president to formally speak out against lynching and advocate for Black American civil rights.
More at link...
I am oddly not afraid of the Aryan Brotherhood getting revenge on me.
It is a simple fact that filibustering did not start with Jim Crow, but Jim Crow started with filibustering, and was supported with filibustering.
I personally am against the filibuster rules, just not selectively against it. In fact, I am against having a Senate where some states have 80 times the power per voter as others. The purpose of government should not be to represent more government, or to take rights from citizens and give it to government.