1/2 TRUE, 1/2 FAKE - Alex Collier (moon base theorist and pseudo-science nut)

Part Multi 313

Verified User
Thing about these alien conspiracy nuts is that many of them have some piece of hard evidence but when they open they their mouths they say a ton of shit that just cant be true. Take Alex Collier for example whom I discovered yesterday through YouTube. Now, theres a video from 1996 where hes doing this hotel lecture (as many of them do) and hes got real NASA moon photos from the late 1960s. He points out some buildings and bridges and obviously unnatural structures and you think, hey this man knows something about this stuff. But then, he says a ton of out there impossible things like gravity isnt the effect of mass and density that gravity is caused when the sunlight hits the earth and the electrons gather in the center of the earth which is also hollow. He claims alien contact with beings from the galaxy Andromeda and that theres reptilian races fighting humans across the Milky Way. He says a ton of shit like that that you know cannot be true. He appears to be making a lot of his facts up as he mumbles along. Truth is, through all the nonesense pouring out of his mouth, he does have real NASA photos showing real unnatural formations on the moon. I couldnt watch the whole video because it bored me half to death. Anyways, check it out if youd like.

 
Last edited:
To further elaborate on this, one must wonder why would we have someone with hard evidence of built structures on the moon who was totally discreditable and laughable in his lectures? The answer lies in government conspiracy. The U.S. government knew that they couldn't keep everything secret and that they would miss details such as pixel size structures on large photographs. People would find evidence if they looked hard enough. So, before all of the credible sources materialized out of the woodwork the U.S. government needed to craft a precedence of discreditibility within the UFO conspiracy community. So, you get people like Alex Collier, who was in all probability a government agent, whose duty was to mix fact with fiction and put on a facade of unreliability in order to discourage creditable intellectuals from using evidence such as the moon photos he used to gain a foothold on the American public. If creditable and sane scientists were to challenge the government and lend creditibility to the UFO conspiracy community the government would lose control over that power of information and a public demand backed with credible sources could conceivably tear down that veil of secrecy. If the public had a strong case of proof backed with credible scientists presenting hard evidence then a case could be made for declassification and disclosure. So, the U.S. government set up these decoy agents holding small bits of hard evidence and then drenched them in nutty propoganda and half sane personaes. The citizens should have a right to know in the land of freedom, particularly when non-human intelligent species could be connected. I suppose this secrecy is their only bargaining chip.
 
There is a series on TV called Moon. It has a conspiracy theorist present a conspiracy, then they use science to debunk. One of the debunkers is an ex-astronaut.
 
I still hold to to the theory that we went to the moon, but the government faked pictures because they didn't want to admit they forgot to send film for the camera.......
 
Back
Top