1 Million + Protesters In DC

Zac brewed a big batch of Kool-Aid and you swilled it. There were nowhere near 1 million teabagging idiots in DC that day.
 
Zac brewed a big batch of Kool-Aid and you swilled it. There were nowhere near 1 million teabagging idiots in DC that day.

Zac was not a disinterested number cruncher. At the end of the report, he writes: "I did march on 9/12, and I believe this was more than a Right wing nutjob thing". He's a teabagger who wants to believe the march was bigger than it really was.

The rest of his report is filled with phrases like this:

"Theoretically" "rough estimate" "reasonable number" "we can safely say" "plus or minus a few thousand" "pictures can be deceiving" "I cannot claim that these are in fact real photos" "if this is in fact a real event, which I'm not saying it is or isn't" "If you believe it, you believe it. If you don't you don't." "I'm assuming it's pretty accurate"

Not exactly confidence-inspiring.
 
Zac was not a disinterested number cruncher. At the end of the report, he writes: "I did march on 9/12, and I believe this was more than a Right wing nutjob thing". He's a teabagger who wants to believe the march was bigger than it really was.

The rest of his report is filled with phrases like this:

"Theoretically" "rough estimate" "reasonable number" "we can safely say" "plus or minus a few thousand" "pictures can be deceiving" "I cannot claim that these are in fact real photos" "if this is in fact a real event, which I'm not saying it is or isn't" "If you believe it, you believe it. If you don't you don't." "I'm assuming it's pretty accurate"

Not exactly confidence-inspiring.

It inspired me to have confidence. Confidence that a rightwing teabagger will happily tell any lie to inflate his or her self-importance.

I was there, and the crowd was not large.
 
Zac was not a disinterested number cruncher. At the end of the report, he writes: "I did march on 9/12, and I believe this was more than a Right wing nutjob thing". He's a teabagger who wants to believe the march was bigger than it really was.

The rest of his report is filled with phrases like this:

"Theoretically" "rough estimate" "reasonable number" "we can safely say" "plus or minus a few thousand" "pictures can be deceiving" "I cannot claim that these are in fact real photos" "if this is in fact a real event, which I'm not saying it is or isn't" "If you believe it, you believe it. If you don't you don't." "I'm assuming it's pretty accurate"

Not exactly confidence-inspiring.

But that's all the excuse our resident neocon parrots need to justify their pitiful beliefs....forget that professionals like the local Police and Fire Dept., who's job it is to gauge possible safety hazzards regarding crowd control, don't jibe with some neocon blogger. Pseudo-science along with half assed theories, half truths, exaggerations, distortions....these are the basis for teabaggers, birthers and the lot.
 
Back
Top