34 years ago today.........

Little-Acorn

New member
34 years ago today, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down the decision in the case Roe v. Wade, announcing they had found a "right to privacy" protected by the Constitution even though that document never mentioned it.

This decision set the bar for all subsequent nominees for the Federal courts by Presidents of either party: The Democrats to make sure that all nominees would be willing to twist and distort the Constitution's meaning at least as much as the Court did on Jan. 22, 1973, thus clearing the way for favorable judgements on their unconstitutional agenda; and the Republicans to make sure they wouldn't, but would obey and uphold the Consitution as written instead.
 
34 years ago today, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down the decision in the case Roe v. Wade, announcing they had found a "right to privacy" protected by the Constitution even though that document never mentioned it.

This decision set the bar for all subsequent nominees for the Federal courts by Presidents of either party: The Democrats to make sure that all nominees would be willing to twist and distort the Constitution's meaning at least as much as the Court did on Jan. 22, 1973, thus clearing the way for favorable judgements on their unconstitutional agenda; and the Republicans to make sure they wouldn't, but would obey and uphold the Consitution as written instead.

Of course, people don't have a right to privacy.
 
Liberals do react with emotion. That's why they think non-liberals are so evil.

I guess both sides act on emotion. If S&M claims to be a conservative, then some conservatives act on emotion as well.

You on the other hand, are just a weirdo, like me.
 
34 years ago today, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down the decision in the case Roe v. Wade, announcing they had found a "right to privacy" protected by the Constitution even though that document never mentioned it.

This decision set the bar for all subsequent nominees for the Federal courts by Presidents of either party: The Democrats to make sure that all nominees would be willing to twist and distort the Constitution's meaning at least as much as the Court did on Jan. 22, 1973, thus clearing the way for favorable judgements on their unconstitutional agenda; and the Republicans to make sure they wouldn't, but would obey and uphold the Consitution as written instead.


I think republicans should run on a national platform to overturn roe v. wade; classify abortion as murder; and specify criminal penalties for doctors and women who do abortions.

But, of course you won't. Because its just a wedge issue for you. To dupe theocons into voting for repukes.
 
I think republicans should run on a national platform to overturn roe v. wade; classify abortion as murder; and specify criminal penalties for doctors and women who do abortions.

But, of course you won't. Because its just a wedge issue for you. To dupe theocons into voting for repukes.

Theocons aren't the only ones to use wedge issues. The whole system does, and it has cheerleaders that perpetuate this kind of crap.
 
I think republicans should run on a national platform to overturn roe v. wade; classify abortion as murder; and specify criminal penalties for doctors and women who do abortions.

But, of course you won't. Because its just a wedge issue for you. To dupe theocons into voting for repukes.

There's also GOP history to follow. Did the GOP run on a platform to abolish slavery in 1854-1860 or did it run on a policy to contain it to loser states? The same rule must obviously apply here? Then it takes years to receive credit, and within a century, the opponents of the strategy will then claim the results as being of their making...
 
Well, I'm 21 now, was not a whiny child, and am a Republican. Go figure. My parents would have been disappointed If I had been a whiny child.
 
I know...it saddens me too.

If only it had been decided 2 decades earlier, we might not have been stuck with W. There's a failed abortion tragic in its consequences.
 
Back
Top