A challenge to the anti-gun crowd here. - part deux

U

USFREEDOM911

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
On the original thread, Stone and I were having an exchange, regarding firearms, he made a comment, I challenged him, and apparently he's developed amnesia since then, seeing as how he's ran from his own assumptions.

I therefore have decided to move the conversation to it's own thread, so it's easier for him to "find".

USFREEDOM911 said:
Then explain which ones you FEEL need to be under greater control and please don't try to use the worn out argument concerning hunting?
Click to expand...
StoneByStone said:
Any gun that fires faster than a standard handgun, or can hold more than ten rounds, should be illegal.
There can be exceptions, of course. Maybe rural areas with dangerous animals can have less strict regulations.
Do you FEEL that would be enough to defend yourself?
Click to expand...
USFREEDOM911 said:
Before we get into this to deep, what is your qualification for a "standard handgun"?

How would banning magazines that hold more then 10 rounds make a difference, in you opinion?
Click to expand...
StoneByStone said:
Guns like the Beretta M9.

It would make killing lots of people on a shooting spree more difficult, but you'd still be able to defend yourself from home invaders.
Click to expand...
USFREEDOM911 said:
Don't tell me a make or model; but what the overall design of the hand gun essentially is;; because then we can move forward.

By the way, the Beretta M9 has a 15 round Magazine Capacity.
Click to expand...

Stone doesn't see his error.

Can anyone else see it??
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
On the original thread, Stone and I were having an exchange, regarding firearms, he made a comment, I challenged him, and apparently he's developed amnesia since then, seeing as how he's ran from his own assumptions.

I therefore have decided to move the conversation to it's own thread, so it's easier for him to "find".







Stone doesn't see his error.

Can anyone else see it??
Click to expand...

Yes, the Beretta M9 model should be changed to only hold ten rounds. However, it fires at a standard speed.
And there is no reason to get triggered, we're just talking.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
On the original thread, Stone and I were having an exchange, regarding firearms, he made a comment, I challenged him, and apparently he's developed amnesia since then, seeing as how he's ran from his own assumptions.

I therefore have decided to move the conversation to it's own thread, so it's easier for him to "find".







Stone doesn't see his error.

Can anyone else see it??
Click to expand...

Sure, that is easy, he engaged in an exchange with a gun advocate who is never going to accept the fact that more guns doesn't make the US safer, nor has it ever made the US safer, common sense dictates the opposite seeing we got more guns out there and are still the leading developed nation in the world with gun deaths
 
StoneByStone said:
Yes, the Beretta M9 model should be changed to only hold ten rounds. However, it fires at a standard speed.
And there is no reason to get triggered, we're just talking.
Click to expand...

But for some reason you didn't include this "disclaimer", when you suggested it.

Why is that?

Maybe you didn't realize that it held 15 rounds and just FELT that it sounded good!! :dunno:

But how would changing the size of the magazine, make it "safer'??
 
archives said:
Sure, that is easy, he engaged in an exchange with a gun advocate who is never going to accept the fact that more guns doesn't make the US safer, nor has it ever made the US safer, common sense dictates the opposite seeing we got more guns out there and are still the leading developed nation in the world with gun deaths
Click to expand...

Nope, you've failed; but thanks for giving it your best "shot". :laugh:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
But for some reason you didn't include this "disclaimer", when you suggested it.

Why is that?

Maybe you didn't realize that it held 15 rounds and just FELT that it sounded good!! :dunno:

But how would changing the size of the magazine, make it "safer'??
Click to expand...

You're being ridiculous now. :laugh:

Changing the size of the magazine would make it harder to kill more people on a shooting spree.
 
CFM said:
Common sense says if you don't think people should own guns, you should get off your lazy ass and personally try to take them.
Click to expand...

Now we got this one with his lame ass challenges, I'm not driving to Mississippi or whatever backward State you reside in to take away your toys, you kidding, considering the the possibilities of anyone getting shot by a gun go up astronomically by just having a gun present I hope you have all the toys your underdeveloped libido requires.
 
archives said:
Now we got this one with his lame ass challenges, I'm not driving to Mississippi or whatever backward State you reside in to take away your toys, you kidding, considering the the possibilities of anyone getting shot by a gun go up astronomically by just having a gun present I hope you have all the toys your underdeveloped libido requires.
Click to expand...

Which is bullshit; unless you can explain why MILLIONS of people haven't been shot, seeing as how they own firearms.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
You may think it's obvious; but please, go into detail why you think it's going to make it harder.

Unless you're not confident to defend your assertion(s).
Click to expand...

Bullets are needed to kill people. A gun with less bullets can kill less people. Having to reload will literally save lives.

By the way, your signature really undercuts your argument.
 
StoneByStone said:
Bullets are needed to kill people. A gun with less bullets can kill less people. Having to reload will literally save lives.

By the way, your signature really undercuts your argument.
Click to expand...

Now that you've expressed your opinion, may I prove you to be in error or will you just deny it and make excuses; because I have information that will refute your conclusion?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Which is bullshit; unless you can explain why MILLIONS of people haven't been shot, seeing as how they own firearms.
Click to expand...

Hardly, the facts remain we have more guns out there than any other developed nation and we have more gun deaths than any other developed nation, and we do lead all developed nations in the number of gun related deaths per year

And common sense dictates that if you have a gun in your house your probability of being hurt by that gun are astronomically higher than a guy who doesn't have a weapon in his residence, fact of proximity and probability
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top