A couple questions for those against the health care bill..

of course you haven't.....I asked three, I reminded you I asked three, all you have to do is look at my posts to find three....for you to make that comment without going back to look for them (a rather simple matter) shows that you don't have the balls to answer the other two.....for that matter, the answer you gave to one was half assed....you've admitted you're in favor of higher deductible.....why do you defend a bill that requires deductibles to be the same in both private policies and the government policy.....

Because while its not perfect, its better than not doing anythign.
 
comeon, chickenshit liberal.....answer the questions.....no more dodging....here they are again....

.......will Nevada and Missouri be treated differently than other states?.........

.......will the special treatment for union benefit plans be thrown out in the final bill?......
Hidden $10B UAW Bailout Not Enough
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/h...age-not-enough

I'll throw in a bonus question......is it right to collect premiums for ten years from people when you are only providing them with six years coverage.......what if my phone company tried that......"Your bill for phone service is $49 this month"......"but I don't have a phone"....."Yes, but we're going to give you one in four years".........

this is NOT better than doing nothing, and it certainly isn't better than doing the RIGHT thing......
so in answer to your very first question....
1) Are you against any and all healthcare reform?

no, we're just against doing the wrong thing because you aren't smart enough to figure out what the right thing is........
 
Last edited:
comeon, chickenshit liberal.....answer the questions.....no more dodging....here they are again....

.......will Nevada and Missouri be treated differently than other states?.........

.......will the special treatment for union benefit plans be thrown out in the final bill?......
Hidden $10B UAW Bailout Not Enough
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/h...age-not-enough

I'll throw in a bonus question......is it right to collect premiums for ten years from people when you are only providing them with six years coverage.......what if my phone company tried that......"Your bill for phone service is $49 this month"......"but I don't have a phone"....."Yes, but we're going to give you one in four years".........

this is NOT better than doing nothing, and it certainly isn't better than doing the RIGHT thing......
so in answer to your very first question....


no, we're just against doing the wrong thing because you aren't smart enough to figure out what the right thing is........

1)Will be Nevada and MO be treated differently?..... I dont know, I hope not, but again it would be worth it to get a bill.

2) Union Benefits... I dont know.

3) Phone company could do that if they let you know they were doing it up front and you agreed to it.
 
1)Will be Nevada and MO be treated differently?..... I dont know, I hope not, but again it would be worth it to get a bill.

2) Union Benefits... I dont know.

3) Phone company could do that if they let you know they were doing it up front and you agreed to it.

1) if the bill says PostmodernProphet gets free health care for life and you have to pay for it would you say it's worth it since we got the bill?....... since we don't know, we shouldn't pass the bill
2) since we don't know, we shouldn't pass the bill
3) I would be stupid to agree to it and I would be stupid to pass this bill which does the same thing......
 
Last edited:
1) would you say that if the bill says PostmoderProphet gets free health care for life and you have to pay for it would you say it's worth it since we got the bill?....... since we don't know, we shouldn't pass the bill
2) since we don't know, we shouldn't pass the bill
3) I would be stupid to agree to it and I would be stupid to pass this bill which does the same thing......

:good4u:
 
Back
Top