A question for anti-choicers

Exactly Three, and they call conservatives EVIL..:palm:

how how about them now calling it anti-choice...I guess they want to take the ABORTION part out of it.
 
Pro Choice. I'm pro choice, especially on things like a parents choice on where they send their child to school, ie vouchers, but most "pro choices" are anti-choice there. I'm pro choice on whether people should be able to determine their own retirement and opt out of the government's ponzi bullshit, but most who claim to be "pro choice" are not in favor of honest hard working people having the ability to have that choice. I'm pro choice on whether people should be allowed run their businesses in any way they please, even if it means allowing someone to smoke a cigarette in the bar that I built, slaved over and own. Most "Pro choice" people oppose that choice. I'm pro choice when it comes to allowing people to agree to terms of a service or product and a price, but most "pro choicers" oppose the free exchange without government intervention on every level.

Take your "pro choice" bullshit and shove it down your cock sucking throat. Anti choice? Look in the mirror you utter buffoon. Wait until you have to fend for yourself. Daddy's blanket isn't always going to be around fool. Ivory tower liberals. Whadda joke.
 
Pro Choice. I'm pro choice, especially on things like a parents choice on where they send their child to school, ie vouchers, but most "pro choices" are anti-choice there. I'm pro choice on whether people should be able to determine their own retirement and opt out of the government's ponzi bullshit, but most who claim to be "pro choice" are not in favor of honest hard working people having the ability to have that choice. I'm pro choice on whether people should be allowed run their businesses in any way they please, even if it means allowing someone to smoke a cigarette in the bar that I built, slaved over and own. Most "Pro choice" people oppose that choice. I'm pro choice when it comes to allowing people to agree to terms of a service or product and a price, but most "pro choicers" oppose the free exchange without government intervention on every level.

Take your "pro choice" bullshit and shove it down your cock sucking throat. Anti choice? Look in the mirror you utter buffoon. Wait until you have to fend for yourself. Daddy's blanket isn't always going to be around fool. Ivory tower liberals. Whadda joke.

This post succeeds.
 
what about the male that created the life? he has no say despite being half responsible for the creation of the baby?
Being a male myself I would say no. the males role in baby making isn't very significant. A man can walk away. For the woman its a very different thing.Unlike the male she cant walk away. Pregnancy changes a woman's whole life. Besides bringing an unwanted child in to life is a very irresponsible thing to do.
 
Being a male myself I would say no. the males role in baby making isn't very significant. A man can walk away. For the woman its a very different thing.Unlike the male she cant walk away. Pregnancy changes a woman's whole life. Besides bringing an unwanted child in to life is a very irresponsible thing to do.

The fact that a male can walk away doesn't make it right. And it doesn't make him less responsible for what he started.
 
Being a male myself I would say no. the males role in baby making isn't very significant. A man can walk away. For the woman its a very different thing.Unlike the male she cant walk away. Pregnancy changes a woman's whole life. Besides bringing an unwanted child in to life is a very irresponsible thing to do.

isn't significant? i guess you never had the birds and the bees talk...

wtf does walking away have to do with making babies and having a say whether the baby lives or not? just because some men walk away you actually believe this makes it so ALL men have no say in whether the woman can kill the baby? as if it is ONLY the woman's life who changes....

either you're joking or have no concept of creating life between a man and a woman
 
not only that, but i bet watermark doesn't support the right of the father to stop the mother from having an abortion

Why would I support that?

Maybe if we had an artificial embryo that they could put it in instead (although that would still force the woman to undergo surgery). But I don't think the man should have veto right to force the woman to carry the child.
 
Why would I support that?

Maybe if we had an artificial embryo that they could put it in instead (although that would still force the woman to undergo surgery). But I don't think the man should have veto right to force the woman to carry the child.

You don't really support "choice" anyway. So fess up, its a political hotbutton that makes you cool at your age. But you've never given a dime's worth of thought about what choice is. Yeah, your frat boys convinced you that "choice" stops at abortion. Sure it does. That's the only choice that's up to the government to decide. Fool.
 
I don't know, why did you decide to oppose an infant's ability to choose life?

It isn't advanced enough to be an infant. The only way you could really support the literal pro-life position would be to believe in some sort of soul - which is bigotry towards the non-religious amongst us.
 
You don't really support "choice" anyway. So fess up, its a political hotbutton that makes you cool at your age. But you've never given a dime's worth of thought about what choice is. Yeah, your frat boys convinced you that "choice" stops at abortion. Sure it does. That's the only choice that's up to the government to decide. Fool.

Yep. Being a liberal atheist pro-choicer in the middle of Mississippi, where over 90% of the white population is composed of radically conservative Republicans, and the black population hates you anyway because your an atheist, makes you cool. Thanks for that beefy.
 
It isn't advanced enough to be an infant. The only way you could really support the literal pro-life position would be to believe in some sort of soul - which is bigotry towards the non-religious amongst us.

not really....if you look at it non religiously, it is more human....it is a child growing inside its mother....babies are taken out of their mother prematurely all the time, are they not human? why is it not human just because it is inside its mother?
 
Back
Top