Shinzo wants to sink Trump:
NOT giving Trump the PP is the best thing the Nobel Committee can do for him. If President Trump actually gets the prize he should tell them “I accept. Send the check and forget the rest.”
President Trump was in trouble when Nutso qualified him:
Less than 2 percent of the 6 billion adults in the world is a fair guesstimate of the number of people who ever heard of the Nobel PP. The number of people who care drops to a minute fraction of 1 percent.
Over the years, I posted messages critical of the history of Nobel Peace Prizes. Calling it a Peace Prize is a misnomer to begin with because the PP is often awarded for salesmanship rather than achievement. To put it more succinctly it is based on selling the absence of war rather than predicated on preventing governments from engaging in institutional murder.
Remember that Obama got a Nobel Peace Prize for his touchy-feely rhetoric. The things he did, namely getting New START ratified, is more than the rhetoric of a demagogue. His betrayals justified his Nobel to the International community if not to Americans.
NOTE: Agent 006 & 7/8[SUP]ths[/SUP] reported that the Norwegians wanted to give Obama a second one, while the Swedes wanted him to return the first one:
Nobel Peace Prizes now favor environmental hustlers. Gorbachev founded Green Cross International. The best Gorby joke is that he got his PP for getting booted out on his ass by his own people.
When Ronald Reagan led the fight that defeated the Soviet Union it was a bold stroke for peace, yet no Peace Prize was forthcoming.
PP winner Wangari Maathai (1940 - 2011) founded the Green Belt Movement.
Top global warming hustler, Al Gore, shared his 2007 prize with the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
A couple more environmental winners and they can name a new category: Nobel Prize for Environmental Bullshit?
Since the end of WWI people with a connection to the League of Nations and its successor, the U.N., have probably won more Nobel Peace Prizes than the New York Yankees won pennants. Maybe that is the reason the world is far from peaceful!
There is no doubt that global government advocates have always had the inside track to Nobel Peace Prizes going all the way back to the early nineteen-hundreds; Socialism’s early years in the U.S. as well as awarding the first Nobel Peace Prize in 1901. I doubt very much if anyone who believed in a world populated by sovereign nations ever had a chance of winning a Nobel Peace Prize.
The PP is clearly a political trophy. No one denies it. The Nobel Peace Prize, awarded by the NORWEGIAN parliament, has always been recognized as a political award:
Peace Prize winners should never be held in the same high esteem as those who get theirs for actually doing something useful in the exact sciences. I have the utmost respect for the men and women who win a Nobel Prize for physics, chemistry, physiology, or medicine
I refuse to give literature and economics the same respect the exact sciences deserve. Literature is especially troubling. Toni Morrison, black American woman and Nobel Prize Winner for literature (1993) was the first person to see through Bill Clinton’s white epidermis. “Clinton is the first black American president” was a Morrison epiphany. (Obama ran under false pretenses if Morrison is correct about Clinton.) The troubling thing about Nobel prizes for literature is that people who think like Morrison write books.
If the prize for literature is a political joke the prize for economics is five acts of vaudeville.
The first Nobel Prize in Economics was awarded in 1969. In other words it was invented. Alfred Nobel never heard of it. The joke is that the award for the Nobel Prize in Economics is paid by the Sveriges Riksbank.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Memorial_Prize_in_Economic_Sciences
The Sveriges Riksbank pays the Nobel Foundation for the use of the name. The reason is obvious. Nobel Prize for Economics sounds better than Sveriges Riksbank Prize for Economics. It is like Betty Crocker paying a fee to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences so they can call a baking award an Oscar. A prize awarded by a European bank is more obscene than the propaganda prizes for “peace” and literature.
Parenthetically, economists always remind me of priests. The only significant difference between the two is that religious missionaries preach to the masses while economists preach to those who control the masses.
Not to be outdone by men of the cloth, economists convinced First World governments that economists are the only ones who know enough about money to talk about it in the halls of power.
Here are a few winners adored by the global government crowd:
Ralph Bunche (1904 - 1971) got his PP in 1950 for his work on the United Nations Palestine Commission. In light of what is happening over there these days his heirs should return the money.
Another “winner” worth mentioning is Philip John Noel-Baker (1889-1982), a British politician who helped draft the Covenant of the League of Nations (1919) and, also, the United Nations Charter (1945). Noel-Baker won the 1959 Nobel Peace Prize.
League of Nation global villagers were determined not to be denied success the second time around. Still promoting the same old Wilsonian crapola they moved their desks over to the United Nations in 1945. In short: Same jockey —— different horse.
When Wangari Maathai won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2004 she was identified as a “Kenyan ecologist.” I knew what a Kenyan was, but I was not sure what an ecologist did? I soon learned that stopping deforestation was another environmental con job on par with global warming.
NOTE: Wangari Maathai is credited with planting a million trees! Think about the amount of time it would take to plant a million of anything. I doubt if Johnny Appleseed had enough time to spread a million apple tree seeds around let alone plant them.
Environmental wack jobs are one thing, but Wangari should have been moved over to the screwball column when she said the West created HIV in a lab. I do not know if that unproven charge was considered by the Nobel Awards Committee along with human Rights and the evils of deforestation. I do know that if a real scientist made such a statement without proof he or she would be ostracized by fellow scientists.
I will close with a good laugh:
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe “gave me the most beautiful copy of a letter that he sent to the people who give out a thing called the Nobel Prize,” Trump told reporters in the Rose Garden when asked about his upcoming summit with Kim later this month in Vietnam.
“He said, ‘I have nominated you, respectfully, on behalf of Japan. I am asking them to give you the Nobel Peace Prize.’”
“He said, ‘I have nominated you, respectfully, on behalf of Japan. I am asking them to give you the Nobel Peace Prize.’”
Japanese Prime Minister Nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
By Ivan Pentchoukov
February 15, 2019 Updated: February 16, 2019
https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-japanese-leader-nominated-me-for-nobel-peace-prize_2802983.html
By Ivan Pentchoukov
February 15, 2019 Updated: February 16, 2019
https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-japanese-leader-nominated-me-for-nobel-peace-prize_2802983.html
NOT giving Trump the PP is the best thing the Nobel Committee can do for him. If President Trump actually gets the prize he should tell them “I accept. Send the check and forget the rest.”
President Trump was in trouble when Nutso qualified him:
Even Pelosi Admits Trump Could Qualify for Nobel Peace Prize: ‘Let’s See How It Goes’
TRE GOINS-PHILLIPS
APR 30, 2018 | 12:59 PM
https://ijr.com/ijr-red/2018/04/1090042-nancy-pelosi-trump-nobel-peace-prize/
TRE GOINS-PHILLIPS
APR 30, 2018 | 12:59 PM
https://ijr.com/ijr-red/2018/04/1090042-nancy-pelosi-trump-nobel-peace-prize/
Less than 2 percent of the 6 billion adults in the world is a fair guesstimate of the number of people who ever heard of the Nobel PP. The number of people who care drops to a minute fraction of 1 percent.
Over the years, I posted messages critical of the history of Nobel Peace Prizes. Calling it a Peace Prize is a misnomer to begin with because the PP is often awarded for salesmanship rather than achievement. To put it more succinctly it is based on selling the absence of war rather than predicated on preventing governments from engaging in institutional murder.
Remember that Obama got a Nobel Peace Prize for his touchy-feely rhetoric. The things he did, namely getting New START ratified, is more than the rhetoric of a demagogue. His betrayals justified his Nobel to the International community if not to Americans.
NOTE: Agent 006 & 7/8[SUP]ths[/SUP] reported that the Norwegians wanted to give Obama a second one, while the Swedes wanted him to return the first one:
One Last Treasonous Act=> Obama Approves Uranium Shipment to Iran – Enough to Build 10 Nuclear Weapons
Jim Hoft
Jan 9th, 2017 12:00 pm
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...hipment-iran-enough-build-10-nuclear-weapons/
Jim Hoft
Jan 9th, 2017 12:00 pm
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...hipment-iran-enough-build-10-nuclear-weapons/
Nobel Peace Prizes now favor environmental hustlers. Gorbachev founded Green Cross International. The best Gorby joke is that he got his PP for getting booted out on his ass by his own people.
When Ronald Reagan led the fight that defeated the Soviet Union it was a bold stroke for peace, yet no Peace Prize was forthcoming.
PP winner Wangari Maathai (1940 - 2011) founded the Green Belt Movement.
Top global warming hustler, Al Gore, shared his 2007 prize with the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
A couple more environmental winners and they can name a new category: Nobel Prize for Environmental Bullshit?
Since the end of WWI people with a connection to the League of Nations and its successor, the U.N., have probably won more Nobel Peace Prizes than the New York Yankees won pennants. Maybe that is the reason the world is far from peaceful!
There is no doubt that global government advocates have always had the inside track to Nobel Peace Prizes going all the way back to the early nineteen-hundreds; Socialism’s early years in the U.S. as well as awarding the first Nobel Peace Prize in 1901. I doubt very much if anyone who believed in a world populated by sovereign nations ever had a chance of winning a Nobel Peace Prize.
The PP is clearly a political trophy. No one denies it. The Nobel Peace Prize, awarded by the NORWEGIAN parliament, has always been recognized as a political award:
Peace Prize winners should never be held in the same high esteem as those who get theirs for actually doing something useful in the exact sciences. I have the utmost respect for the men and women who win a Nobel Prize for physics, chemistry, physiology, or medicine
I refuse to give literature and economics the same respect the exact sciences deserve. Literature is especially troubling. Toni Morrison, black American woman and Nobel Prize Winner for literature (1993) was the first person to see through Bill Clinton’s white epidermis. “Clinton is the first black American president” was a Morrison epiphany. (Obama ran under false pretenses if Morrison is correct about Clinton.) The troubling thing about Nobel prizes for literature is that people who think like Morrison write books.
If the prize for literature is a political joke the prize for economics is five acts of vaudeville.
The first Nobel Prize in Economics was awarded in 1969. In other words it was invented. Alfred Nobel never heard of it. The joke is that the award for the Nobel Prize in Economics is paid by the Sveriges Riksbank.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Memorial_Prize_in_Economic_Sciences
The Sveriges Riksbank pays the Nobel Foundation for the use of the name. The reason is obvious. Nobel Prize for Economics sounds better than Sveriges Riksbank Prize for Economics. It is like Betty Crocker paying a fee to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences so they can call a baking award an Oscar. A prize awarded by a European bank is more obscene than the propaganda prizes for “peace” and literature.
Parenthetically, economists always remind me of priests. The only significant difference between the two is that religious missionaries preach to the masses while economists preach to those who control the masses.
Not to be outdone by men of the cloth, economists convinced First World governments that economists are the only ones who know enough about money to talk about it in the halls of power.
Here are a few winners adored by the global government crowd:
Ralph Bunche (1904 - 1971) got his PP in 1950 for his work on the United Nations Palestine Commission. In light of what is happening over there these days his heirs should return the money.
Another “winner” worth mentioning is Philip John Noel-Baker (1889-1982), a British politician who helped draft the Covenant of the League of Nations (1919) and, also, the United Nations Charter (1945). Noel-Baker won the 1959 Nobel Peace Prize.
League of Nation global villagers were determined not to be denied success the second time around. Still promoting the same old Wilsonian crapola they moved their desks over to the United Nations in 1945. In short: Same jockey —— different horse.
When Wangari Maathai won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2004 she was identified as a “Kenyan ecologist.” I knew what a Kenyan was, but I was not sure what an ecologist did? I soon learned that stopping deforestation was another environmental con job on par with global warming.
NOTE: Wangari Maathai is credited with planting a million trees! Think about the amount of time it would take to plant a million of anything. I doubt if Johnny Appleseed had enough time to spread a million apple tree seeds around let alone plant them.
Environmental wack jobs are one thing, but Wangari should have been moved over to the screwball column when she said the West created HIV in a lab. I do not know if that unproven charge was considered by the Nobel Awards Committee along with human Rights and the evils of deforestation. I do know that if a real scientist made such a statement without proof he or she would be ostracized by fellow scientists.
I will close with a good laugh:
